On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:52:42 -0500, Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 09:01 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:41:55 -0500, Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 09:27 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > > > When crtc1 is a
On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 09:01 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:41:55 -0500, Michel DÃnzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 09:27 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > > When crtc1 is at offset 0 pageflipping should work with a simple
> > > patch to radeon_driver.c::Ra
Alex Deucher wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:41:55 -0500, Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 09:27 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
Ok, so last night I think I figured out why pageflipping was borked
with mergedfb. Unfortunately the fix requires changes to the drm and
sarea. I
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 17:47:31 +0100, Roland Scheidegger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Deucher wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:41:55 -0500, Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 09:27 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >>
> >>>Ok, so last night I think I figured out w
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:41:55 -0500, Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 09:27 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > Ok, so last night I think I figured out why pageflipping was borked
> > with mergedfb. Unfortunately the fix requires changes to the drm and
> > sarea. I'm won
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 09:27 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> Ok, so last night I think I figured out why pageflipping was borked
> with mergedfb. Unfortunately the fix requires changes to the drm and
> sarea. I'm wondering what the best way to do this is and maintain
> compatability. When crtc1 is a
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 17:04 +0100, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > It's a little tricky - I guess you'll need some way of informing the
> > kernel which way it is supposed to calculate crtc1_base, either by a new
> > call to the SET_PARAMETER ioctl, or via the ABI version se
Keith Whitwell wrote:
It's a little tricky - I guess you'll need some way of informing the
kernel which way it is supposed to calculate crtc1_base, either by a new
call to the SET_PARAMETER ioctl, or via the ABI version setting
interface. I don't have a good understanding of the latter, the for
Also, I think the clear code in the radeon driver is hardwired to
assume a scan out buffer starting at zero. Clear is using the 2D
engine. There was some reason I was going to switch it to using the 3D
one but I forget why. The reason was related to moving the scan out
buffer away from zero.
--
J
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:48:08 -0500, Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If we are going to fix this, can we go all the way and let crtc0_base
> and crtc1_base both have any value and not force crtc0 to zero? That
> would make it easier to do something like an OOPs display when X is
> running. The
If we are going to fix this, can we go all the way and let crtc0_base
and crtc1_base both have any value and not force crtc0 to zero? That
would make it easier to do something like an OOPs display when X is
running. The OOPs display could use a new scan out buffer and not
disturb the one with a pro
Keith Whitwell wrote:
Alex Deucher wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:20:41 +, Keith Whitwell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alex Deucher wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 14:35:30 +, Keith Whitwell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alex Deucher wrote:
Ok, so last night I think I figured out why pageflipping wa
Alex Deucher wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:20:41 +, Keith Whitwell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alex Deucher wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 14:35:30 +, Keith Whitwell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alex Deucher wrote:
Ok, so last night I think I figured out why pageflipping was borked
with mergedfb
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:20:41 +, Keith Whitwell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Deucher wrote:
> > On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 14:35:30 +, Keith Whitwell
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Alex Deucher wrote:
> >>
> >>>Ok, so last night I think I figured out why pageflipping was borked
> >>>wi
Alex Deucher wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 14:35:30 +, Keith Whitwell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alex Deucher wrote:
Ok, so last night I think I figured out why pageflipping was borked
with mergedfb. Unfortunately the fix requires changes to the drm and
sarea. I'm wondering what the best way to
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 14:35:30 +, Keith Whitwell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Deucher wrote:
> > Ok, so last night I think I figured out why pageflipping was borked
> > with mergedfb. Unfortunately the fix requires changes to the drm and
> > sarea. I'm wondering what the best way to do thi
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 14:35:30 +, Keith Whitwell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Deucher wrote:
> > Ok, so last night I think I figured out why pageflipping was borked
> > with mergedfb. Unfortunately the fix requires changes to the drm and
> > sarea. I'm wondering what the best way to do thi
Alex Deucher wrote:
Ok, so last night I think I figured out why pageflipping was borked
with mergedfb. Unfortunately the fix requires changes to the drm and
sarea. I'm wondering what the best way to do this is and maintain
compatability. When crtc1 is at offset 0 pageflipping should work
with a
Ok, so last night I think I figured out why pageflipping was borked
with mergedfb. Unfortunately the fix requires changes to the drm and
sarea. I'm wondering what the best way to do this is and maintain
compatability. When crtc1 is at offset 0 pageflipping should work
with a simple patch to rade
19 matches
Mail list logo
