On Wednesday 23 November 2005 18:32, Alan Cox wrote:
On Mer, 2005-11-23 at 11:46 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 07:48, Michael Frank
wrote:
Testing 2.6.15-rc2 in-kernel DRM, why still no
mach64 support which works fine for me from
snapshots/cvs?
Because
Testing 2.6.15-rc2 in-kernel DRM, why still no mach64
support which works fine for me from snapshots/cvs?
Michael
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today
Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 07:48, Michael Frank wrote:
Testing 2.6.15-rc2 in-kernel DRM, why still no mach64
support which works fine for me from snapshots/cvs?
Because it's still insecure.
- ajax
pgpRVEStYxIcP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mer, 2005-11-23 at 11:46 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 07:48, Michael Frank wrote:
Testing 2.6.15-rc2 in-kernel DRM, why still no mach64
support which works fine for me from snapshots/cvs?
Because it's still insecure.
Michael - If you've got a Mach64 and you