Re: Mach64 still not in kernel tree

2005-11-26 Thread Michael Frank
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 18:32, Alan Cox wrote: > On Mer, 2005-11-23 at 11:46 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > > On Wednesday 23 November 2005 07:48, Michael Frank wrote: > > > Testing 2.6.15-rc2 in-kernel DRM, why still no > > > mach64 support which works fine for me from > > > snapshots/cvs? >

Re: Mach64 still not in kernel tree

2005-11-23 Thread Alan Cox
On Mer, 2005-11-23 at 11:46 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Wednesday 23 November 2005 07:48, Michael Frank wrote: > > Testing 2.6.15-rc2 in-kernel DRM, why still no mach64 > > support which works fine for me from snapshots/cvs? > > Because it's still insecure. Michael - If you've got a Mach64 a

Re: Mach64 still not in kernel tree

2005-11-23 Thread Adam Jackson
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 07:48, Michael Frank wrote: > Testing 2.6.15-rc2 in-kernel DRM, why still no mach64 > support which works fine for me from snapshots/cvs? Because it's still insecure. - ajax pgpRVEStYxIcP.pgp Description: PGP signature

Mach64 still not in kernel tree

2005-11-23 Thread Michael Frank
Testing 2.6.15-rc2 in-kernel DRM, why still no mach64 support which works fine for me from snapshots/cvs? Michael --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certi