Dave Airlie wrote:
BUT nothing uses it. Since it's broken, I'd like to remove all traces of it
(from both user mode and kernel mode). Is there any reason not to? If we
need that functionality later, we can design a better interface for it that
will less fragile.
http://dri.sourceforge.net/doc/
On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 16:40, Ian Romanick wrote:
> Nothing appears to call drmGetBufInfo. The drmBufInfo and drmBufDesc
> structures aren't used anywhere except in that function. The problem is
> (surprise!) the definition for drmBufDesc is different in drm.h from
> what's in xf86drm.h. This
drm/tests/drmstat.c uses it.
--- Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > BUT nothing uses it. Since it's broken, I'd like to remove all traces of it
> > (from both user mode and kernel mode). Is there any reason not to? If we
> > need that functionality later, we can design a better in
> BUT nothing uses it. Since it's broken, I'd like to remove all traces of it
> (from both user mode and kernel mode). Is there any reason not to? If we
> need that functionality later, we can design a better interface for it that
> will less fragile.
http://dri.sourceforge.net/doc/drm_low_le
Nothing appears to call drmGetBufInfo. The drmBufInfo and drmBufDesc
structures aren't used anywhere except in that function. The problem is
(surprise!) the definition for drmBufDesc is different in drm.h from
what's in xf86drm.h. This is only a problem because drmBufInfo has a
pointer to an
