Re: [Dri-users] Re: problems compiling xorg cvs Re: drm CVS state...

2005-01-04 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
redirecting to devel ML On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 23:38 +, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote: If you're still using Linux 2.4 you need to upgrade that first. After think a little and put dri working with kernel 2.4. The only solution, that I see, to not private users of savage with kernel 2.4, have

Re: [Dri-users] Re: problems compiling xorg cvs Re: drm CVS state...

2005-01-04 Thread Lee Revell
On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 22:28 +, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote: On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 22:07 +, Dave Airlie wrote: After think a little and put dri working with kernel 2.4. The only solution, that I see, to not private users of savage with kernel 2.4, have dri. Is do 2 directory on

Re: drm CVS state...

2005-01-02 Thread Felix =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=FChling?=
Am So, den 02.01.2005 schrieb Sergio Monteiro Basto um 2:42: On Fri, 2004-12-31 at 16:02 +0100, Felix Kühling wrote: I was going to change mesa/src/mesa/drivers/dri/Makefile.template to use the share-core directory for DRM includes. This will be needed for the new Savage DRM as it lives

problems compiling xorg cvs Re: drm CVS state...

2005-01-02 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
savage_xmesa.c: In function `savageInitDriver': savage_xmesa.c:111: error: structure has no member named `frontPitch' savage_xmesa.c:113: error: structure has no member named `frontBitmapDesc' savage_xmesa.c:121: error: structure has no member named `backBitmapDesc' savage_xmesa.c:123: error:

Re: drm CVS state...

2005-01-02 Thread Stephane Marchesin
Dave Airlie wrote: Okay some people have commented on the DRM CVS of late, and are unsure of what is happening with it, I'm very willing to drop the shared and linux directories into an archived area but that will stop all support for Linux 2.4, Are some changes underway that might make 2.4 hard

Re: drm CVS state...

2005-01-02 Thread Jon Smirl
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 01:10:37 +0100, Stephane Marchesin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dave Airlie wrote: Okay some people have commented on the DRM CVS of late, and are unsure of what is happening with it, I'm very willing to drop the shared and linux directories into an archived area but that

Re: problems compiling xorg cvs Re: drm CVS state...

2005-01-02 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 00:18 +0100, Felix Kühling wrote: Looks like this was caused by my update of the Savage DDX driver in the X.org tree without also upating the Mesa driver in the X.org tree. At the moment the Mesa driver in X.org's extras/Mesa can't be compiled with the current Savage

Re: drm CVS state...

2005-01-01 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
On Fri, 2004-12-31 at 16:02 +0100, Felix Kühling wrote: I was going to change mesa/src/mesa/drivers/dri/Makefile.template to use the share-core directory for DRM includes. This will be needed for the new Savage DRM as it lives in linux-core/shared-core only. With your assessment of the status

Re: drm CVS state...

2004-12-31 Thread Jerome Glisse
Dave Airlie wrote: Okay some people have commented on the DRM CVS of late, and are unsure of what is happening with it, I'm very willing to drop the shared and linux directories into an archived area but that will stop all support for Linux 2.4, but at the moment I'm getting the impression more

Re: drm CVS state...

2004-12-31 Thread Felix =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=FChling?=
Am Fr, den 31.12.2004 schrieb Dave Airlie um 7:28: Okay some people have commented on the DRM CVS of late, and are unsure of what is happening with it, I'm very willing to drop the shared and linux directories into an archived area but that will stop all support for Linux 2.4, but at the

Re: drm CVS state...

2004-12-31 Thread Jon Smirl
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 15:49:50 +0100, Jerome Glisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dave Airlie wrote: I was wondering what is going on with drm fbdev merging ? Still planed ? Is the drm-core is a first move in that direction ? I have two new babies in the house that were born two months premature.

Re: drm CVS state...

2004-12-31 Thread Owen Taylor
On Fri, 2004-12-31 at 10:45 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote: [...] Some kind of fbdev/drm merge is a requirement of getting X on GL working. [ straying off-topic for this list... ] I would argue that this isn't necessarily true. As soon as you can get dri drivers running within the X server, it would

drm CVS state...

2004-12-30 Thread Dave Airlie
Okay some people have commented on the DRM CVS of late, and are unsure of what is happening with it, I'm very willing to drop the shared and linux directories into an archived area but that will stop all support for Linux 2.4, but at the moment I'm getting the impression more people are using

Re: drm CVS state...

2004-12-30 Thread Jon Smirl
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 06:28:24 + (GMT), Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay some people have commented on the DRM CVS of late, and are unsure of what is happening with it, I'm very willing to drop the shared and linux directories into an archived area but that will stop all support