[droolers] IRC

Thanks to the suggestion by Jason, I've located an IRC network I think we can use. http://openprojects.nu/irc_servers.shtml I'll probably be idling in the #drools channel. -bob ___ drools-interest mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

[droolers] 2.0-beta-1 is available

Okay, pushed out a zipfile and tarball of 2.0-beta-1. Have fun. Some examples (and probably beta-2) will come tomorrow. -bob ___ drools-interest mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest

Re: [droolers] IRC

> Is there an IRC room anywhere for drools? Not as of right now. Isn't there some open-source IRC network? If so, could you blurp me some connection information, and we could pull up #drools. -bob ___ drools-interest mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [droolers] WorkFlow Engine

> I am very interested in making a workflow engine (as I'm sure others on this > list are interested in doing) and I wanted to know if anything has started > in earnest based on drools? Probably not, due to the ethereal nature of drools up until Today. > In the project I work on (Tambora, tambor

[droolers] IRC

Hi, Is there an IRC room anywhere for drools? -- jvz. Jason van Zyl http://tambora.zenplex.org http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria http://jakarta.apache.org/commons ___ drools

[droolers] WorkFlow Engine

Hi, I am very interested in making a workflow engine (as I'm sure others on this list are interested in doing) and I wanted to know if anything has started in earnest based on drools? I've a couple commercial packages that look really neat: http://www.dralasoft.com/products/workflow/index.html

[droolers] unplug

Well kids, I'm unplugging for the night. I think the Java Semantic Module is Done. I've included ease-of-use features. Tomorrow, I'll work on examples and end-user documentation (as opposed to simply the nearly-complete JavaDocs). Now's the time to start banging on it, and let me know what yo

Re: [droolers] Wicked (We now have a rules-file format)

[[ cc:'d to the list ]] > I'm having problems trying to access to cvs, we are using a proxy that > almost never works :( Hmmm... Then tarballs work best for you, right? I'll see if I can't get nightly snapshots auto-building for ya. Might be a few days, though. James-- You have

[droolers] Wicked (We now have a rules-file format)

Okie dokie-- The integration with BeanShell/ANTLR seems mostly complete. In CVS, look at $ROOT/test_data/ruleset.xml, which I've handily reproduced here. I still need to create a friendly API for building RuleSets, and such, but, we can now read .xml files that contain rules. Filter condition

Re: [droolers] bsf integration

> > here's my preference: > > 1. Ease of use. > > 2. Run-time extensibility. > > 3. Speed. > > I think that's the priority list I'm using to direct my activities. +1. Speed can come later. Premature optimisation is the root of all evil and all that. James __