Thank you, Peter, Stuart, Andrea, Alex -
So it sounds like it comes down to how much RAM is available on our
server.
We're going to try 1000, and see how it goes, as we are still on a
development server for just this kind of reason. We are looking at
correcting a very large batch of records
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Schweer [mailto:schw...@waikato.ac.nz]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 6:38 PM
To: dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Dspace-tech] Batch metadata corrections question: does
anyone know why the limit is set to just 20 items at a time?
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 14:00, Lemann, Alexander Bernard
ablem...@bsu.edu wrote:
Relatedly, does anyone know how safe it is to test higher limit values? I
looked at the code to determine whether these batch edits occur within a
single database transaction, but I didn't see any evidence
helix84
Usually, how much time do you wait to import 2000 items via the command line
interface?
Regards
Heitor
De: helix84 heli...@centrum.sk
Para: Alexander Bernard Lemann ablem...@bsu.edu
Cc: dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Enviadas: Quinta-feira, 28 de Julho de 2011 9:17:16
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 15:37, Heitor Barbieri
heitor.barbi...@bireme.org wrote:
Usually, how much time do you wait to import 2000 items via the command line
interface?
Not more than a minute.
Regards,
~~helix84
--
I think the most error-prone part will be displaying the diff (the
list of all changes) via HTTP. This is what is most likely to cause
long waiting times and timeouts, because a lot of HTML will be
generated. I had no problem with command line imports - you can even
halve the time it takes if you
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 15:50, helix84 heli...@centrum.sk wrote:
I think the most error-prone part will be displaying the diff (the
list of all changes) via HTTP. This is what is most likely to cause
long waiting times and timeouts, because a lot of HTML will be
generated.
I would suggest the
Hi Irene,
We're experimenting with making batch corrections to metadata using the
Import Metadata feature in the jsp. We'd like to raise the limit on the
number of items that may be changed at a time.
I can see the file:
Hi Irene,
We've wondered that too at my university, Ohio State University, so we've
upped our setting to 600 which we feel is safe, but users typically do
smaller batches.
I'm guessing the too-low-for-practical-use limit of 20 is to be overly
conservative by default, so that there is no risk of
Hi,
On 28/07/11 10:19, Peter Dietz wrote:
Doing batch changes with a large number of changes will keep your
system busy, and the reindexing can take a while. I've noticed that
when we set the limit to be really high, it appears that nothing will
happen from the user's browser for 20+ minutes,
10 matches
Mail list logo
