Given Motorola's recent acquiring an 80% interest in Yaesu, that is
doubtful.
Additionally, one of the big let downs of Dayton 2007 was the
statement by both Kenwood and Yaesu that they would not be making
anything for D-Star, at least for sale here in the US.
Who knows, this year might see a cha
Wow, the FCC actually got it right for a change!
This petition was ill conceived from the start. Ironically, while
intended (I assume) to further the digital movement, it has somewhat
given it a black eye.
The idea that digital and analog do not co-exist well is an outright
misstatement. We are
In a message dated 5/8/08 8:16:22 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The idea that digital and analog do not co-exist well is an outright
> misstatement.
>
Well, the KJ4ACN system just had our first co-channel interference complaint,
from an analog repeater trustee. It seems that there are some f
Buddy,
Not sure how D-Star is being implemented in your area, so it's hard to
comment on your specific case.
However, as to band openings and Tropo, that is going to get
complaints whether the signal is analog or digital.
One thing analog systems really need to do, which in this day and age
ther
Tropo is a real problem here in Florida and tone encoding/decoding is not going
to solve it. The signal is still there interfering with any transmited signal.
Just lissen to 146.97 ( Largo ) when the band is open and you can hear at least
2 others under it squealing away. My machine ( back in th
--- In dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com, bruce mallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> USERS still hear the rumble of data which is trash to them.
This can be mitigated by "users" using tone squelch on their
individual radios, something that almost all modern radios have. The
analog repeater
If its still available , I'll take it.
Jon VA3RQ
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
email me with details off list.
Jon
--- In dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com, "kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have a IC-2820H for sale with the following options:
> -UT123 DSTAR/GPS Module installed + (unu
I guess I rest my case here.
1.) If the propagation/Tropo is that bad, no reasonable co-channel
spacing is going to solve the problem.
2.) As I noted, CTCSS and/or DCS will not cure true interference. It
will however, keep the unwanted signal from activating the repeater
regardless of how strong
Robert, Buddy is NOT against this as you have mentioned...
We have ham's 100 miles away, using an analog on the same frequency,
and our D-Star repeater is walking over their analog output
It has nothing to do with him accepting the new technology, he, like
myself, are pushing it full speed ah
Does anyone know the status of Satoshi's (7M3TJZ) UT-118 analog radio
interface board ? The last time I heard from him he was going to have
pc boards made up. I sent him a couple of e-mails in the recent past but
have not received a reply.
I also heard that there was a German ham who was goin
Robert wrote:
> One thing analog systems really need to do, which in this day and age
> there is no excuse not to, is use CTCSS or DCS on the receiver.
This type of thing is the reason that Analog FM coordinations in our
area REQUIRE that the system have a working CTCSS decoder.
It doesn't hav
Evan, Buddy,
My apologies, I unintentionally referred to Buddy when in fact my
statements were intended for the other poster (Bruce), who made the
comments about forced tone squelch.
I do completely recognize that each area of the country can have its
own unique geographical (and weather) makeup,
Roger that. Thanks Robert.
Happy Hamming!
Please TRIM your replies or set your email program not to include the original
message in reply unless needed for clarity. ThanksYahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.ya
Oh this is too wonderful a thing to resist.
Coordination, coordinatio, coordination. First off.
Second: Turn the power down a notch on all the repeaters.
Third, look closer at the footprints of the repeaters before turnng on the
power switch.
Ideally every repeater owner wants to cover as much o
N1TAI:
Yes, but when there's enhanced propagation there's nothing you can do
about it. It makes no sense to coordinate out interfernce resulting from
that. It makes sense to accept and take actions to mitigate the effects.
Chuck - N8DNX
On Thu, 8 May 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Oh t
At 02:16 AM 5/9/2008, you wrote:
>--- In dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com, bruce mallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > USERS still hear the rumble of data which is trash to them.
>
>This can be mitigated by "users" using tone squelch on their
>individual radios, something that almost all m
At 02:40 AM 5/9/2008, you wrote:
>I guess I rest my case here.
>
>1.) If the propagation/Tropo is that bad, no reasonable co-channel
>spacing is going to solve the problem.
Agreed. There have been cases of propagation on 2m right across the
country here.
>2.) As I noted, CTCSS and/or DCS will n
At 07:27 AM 5/9/2008, you wrote:
>N1TAI:
> Yes, but when there's enhanced propagation there's nothing you can do
>about it. It makes no sense to coordinate out interfernce resulting from
>that. It makes sense to accept and take actions to mitigate the effects.
Quite frankly, 108 miles in relati
Colorado Group Receives D-STAR Equipment
The Colorado Council of Amateur Radio Clubs (CCARC)
http://www.ccarc.net/ recently teamed up with Ham Radio Outlet (HRO) in Denver
to donate a 2 meter, 70 cm and 23 cm D-STAR system stack. According to ARRL
Colorado Section Manager and CCARC Board Member
Hugh,
i will follow your discusion on this subject.i have read some article about
this Ham and his works on
the possibility too adapt Dstar for a larger audience
73/s
Gervais ,ve2ckn
http://g.msn.ca/ca55/224
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
First qso today with VK4HW Robert and VK4KZK Mark from 55 km out from
repeater site. Great coverage here. Have vk3rbx 2m connected to d-Rats
repeater and vk3ur at moment under supervision etc, for data comms.
Repeater net.vk4tux.no-ip.org:9000
Adrian
VK4TUX
[Non-text portions of this messa
21 matches
Mail list logo
