[DSTAR_DIGITAL] Beeps

2009-10-14 Thread Fran Miele
Several of the users on our system have been discussing the beeps heard on a repeater and it is clear we really don't understand them. I'm sure this has been asked many times before but I can't seem to find a definite answer. Can someone explain the beeps that are heard at the end of a transmis

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Beeps

2009-10-14 Thread Robbie De Lise
As I experience it i think something like this: No beep: The repeater did not confirm your TX, prolly no RX on the repeater side 1st beep: The repeater (CALL A, B or C) confirms your TX 2nd beep: The gateway (CALL G) confirms your TX. Ofcourse, when someone pushes the PTT right after the BEEP or

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Beeps

2009-10-14 Thread Justin G0KSC
, October 14, 2009 2:52 PM Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Beeps As I experience it i think something like this: No beep: The repeater did not confirm your TX, prolly no RX on the repeater side 1st beep: The repeater (CALL A, B or C) confirms your TX 2nd beep: The gateway (CALL G

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Beeps

2009-10-14 Thread Nate Duehr
This is correct from my experience, and it makes sense from a "systems design" standpoint, also. Read on. Starting with an additional data point/example, if you remove the RPT2 route to the Gateway from your radio, you won't receive a confirmation transmission from the Gateway, and thus...

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Beeps

2009-10-14 Thread Nate Duehr
gt; > - Original Message - > From: Robbie De Lise > To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 2:52 PM > Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Beeps > > > As I experience it i think something like this: > > No beep: The repeater did not confirm

RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Beeps

2009-10-14 Thread Fran Miele
@yahoogroups.com [mailto:dstar_digi...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Nate Duehr Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 10:14 AM To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Beeps This is correct from my experience, and it makes sense from a "systems design" standpoint, also. Read on.

RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Beeps

2009-10-14 Thread Fran Miele
day, October 14, 2009 10:01 AM To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Beeps I think you will find the bleeps are from your radio. The receiver bleeps to notify you a DV signal has dropped, not the repeater. Try a simplex QSO, this will confirm this for you. --

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Beeps

2009-10-14 Thread Neil
nge, it has nothing to do with what you are listening to, so same with simplex. Neil. - Original Message - From: "Nate Duehr" To: "Justin G0KSC" Cc: Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 3:15 PM Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Beeps Technically this is also true. The be

RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Beeps

2009-10-14 Thread Nate Duehr
ginal Message- From: [1]dstar_digi...@yahoogroups. com [mailto:[2]dstar_digi...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Nate Duehr Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 10:14 AM To: [3]dstar_digi...@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Beeps This is correct from my experience, and it makes sense from

RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Beeps

2009-10-14 Thread Nate Duehr
ers. Why would we not get any beeps yet everyone heard the transmission? Thanks, Fran, W1FJM -Original Message- From: [1]dstar_digi...@yahoogroups. com [mailto:[2]dstar_digi...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Nate Duehr Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 10:14 AM To: [3]dstar_digi...@yahoogroups.com

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Beeps

2009-10-14 Thread Tony Langdon
At 01:00 AM 10/15/2009, you wrote: >I think you will find the bleeps are from your radio. The receiver >bleeps to notify you a DV signal has dropped, not the repeater. Try >a simplex QSO, this will confirm this for you. They are from the radio. You can turn them off in the menus (at least on

RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Beeps

2009-10-14 Thread Fran Miele
ly.com/weather> _ From: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com [mailto:dstar_digi...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Nate Duehr Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 3:38 PM To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Beeps p.s. Hey, I took something else for granted in my reply Fra