RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Tactical Call indication

2009-05-19 Thread Nate Duehr
On Tue, 19 May 2009 08:30:36 -0600, Barry A. Wilson ka0...@worldnet.att.net said: (NOTE: I know how we identify MYCALL has been left open to local interpretation because there are a few operators here in Denver that like to play with erroneous MYCALL callsigns like RG8U or COAX because

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Tactical Call indication - U.S. ONLY

2009-05-19 Thread John Hays
Yes, its legal (in the US): FCC Part 97.119c One or more indicators may be included with the call sign. Each indicator must be separated from the call sign by the slant mark (/) or by any suitable word that denotes the slant mark. If an indicator is self-assigned, it must be included

RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Tactical Call indication

2009-05-19 Thread Woodrick, Ed
19, 2009 12:17 PM To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Tactical Call indication Relying on having a CALLSIGN in that field is silly in the extreme. It's nice if everyone does it, but the field itself and the technology really don't care what's in the rigs at all. It's

RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Tactical Call indication

2009-05-19 Thread Nate Duehr
On Tue, 19 May 2009 18:45:53 -0400, Woodrick, Ed So I guess if you want to get down to nitpicking, if the callsign is not in the field then you need to make sure to switch your radio to FM and identify appropriately. Actually the opposite is true... Recent FCC cases have affirmed that, for

RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Tactical Call indication

2009-05-19 Thread Nate Duehr
On Tue, 19 May 2009 21:36:36 -0400, Woodrick, Ed ewoodr...@ed-com.com said: Interesting, I see that Pactor III protocol is published at http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/techchar/PACTOR-III.html Ahh they finally gave in and realized it was illegal to keep it proprietary, I see.

RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Tactical Call indication

2009-05-17 Thread Woodrick, Ed
@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Tactical Call indication The 20 character message works very well and would be a good place to do Tactical if you need more than 4 chars.

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Tactical Call indication

2009-05-17 Thread Tom Azlin, N4ZPT
Why not simply put the tactical call in the short message. Then it will scroll by every time you transmit. 73, Tom n4zpt Dennis Griffin wrote: I have worked many public service events disaster preparedness exercises. One would have to be very creative to get meaningful tactical calls

[DSTAR_DIGITAL] Tactical Call indication

2009-05-16 Thread Dennis Griffin
I have worked many public service events disaster preparedness exercises. One would have to be very creative to get meaningful tactical calls with only 4 characters available. I'm often Lead, so that's fine, but how about all the numbered Aid Station, Event, Mobile, Safety, Bicycle,

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Tactical Call indication

2009-05-16 Thread John D. Hays
The 20 character message works very well and would be a good place to do Tactical if you need more than 4 chars. The issue for the callsign is that in D-STAR the callsign field is more than identification, it is part of the addressing scheme. Whereas in APRS you often are just reporting