>
> One slick idea is to use a RAM disk just to hold your browser cache
> files. This completely eliminates any writing to the hard disk.
> On another note, if you have physical ram to spare, set your Netscape
> cache to zero and compensate by giving Netscape as much ram as you can
> spare, s
One slick idea is to use a RAM disk just to hold your browser cache
files. This completely eliminates any writing to the hard disk.
On another note, if you have physical ram to spare, set your Netscape
cache to zero and compensate by giving Netscape as much ram as you can
spare, say 50 MB. Ne
> Tell me, in your experience, does this eliminate that extremely irritating
> habit of NS to d/l & render the page and then when done rendering, BLANK THE
> SCREEN AND RERENDER THE ENTIRE PAGE AT THE SAME GLACIAL PACE??? (As you can
> tell, it get a bit worked up by this behavior.)
>
> - Eric.
>
on 2/27/01 9:52 PM, rlf9 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> on 2/27/01 9:56 AM, Greg at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
Hi all,
Over the years I have come to the conclusion that Netscape (most
> if not
all versions) is faster if you turn the disk cache OFF by
> reducing its
size to 0
> on 2/27/01 9:56 AM, Greg at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> > Hi all,
>> > Over the years I have come to the conclusion that Netscape (most
if not
>> > all versions) is faster if you turn the disk cache OFF by
reducing its
>> > size to 0. I have measured "before and after" on m
Eric L. Strobel said at Ò[Duo2400] Re: browser cacheÓ.
[2001/02/27 07:07]
> on 2/27/01 9:56 AM, Greg at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > Over the years I have come to the conclusion that Netscape (most if not
> > all versions) is faster if you turn the disk cache OFF by reducing its
> >
on 2/27/01 9:56 AM, Greg at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
> Over the years I have come to the conclusion that Netscape (most if not
> all versions) is faster if you turn the disk cache OFF by reducing its
> size to 0. I have measured "before and after" on many occasions and the
> cache alway
