[Duo2400] Re: Upgrading Duo 2300 HD to iBook HD

2001-09-11 Thread David Linker
On my 56MB 2300 with a 3GB drive, I ended up with 8.1 after much trial and error. For me, the only lack was sherlock internet search, but since I no longer hook up to the internet with the 2300, that was not a problem. The main problem was that 8.6 took about twice as much RAM for the system a

[Duo2400] Re: Upgrading Duo 2300 HD to iBook HD

2001-09-05 Thread Dave Perin
rned about RAM. I'm not certain of this, but I'd imagine that 8.1 might use less RAM. -Dave > From: Kris Feldmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Duo/2400 List) > Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 08:33:05 -0700 > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Duo/2400 L

[Duo2400] Re: Upgrading Duo 2300 HD to iBook HD

2001-09-05 Thread Kris Feldmann
Wed, 05 Sep 2001 08:07:31 -0400 > Subject: [Duo2400] Re: Upgrading Duo 2300 HD to iBook HD > > I did a lot of experimenting and testing on my 2300 about the same questions > this summer. The difference in startup time between 8.1 and 8.6 was > insignificant... they both booted in ju

[Duo2400] Re: Upgrading Duo 2300 HD to iBook HD

2001-09-05 Thread Kris Feldmann
Usually in a case like this, since the drive is new (to the machine) and will be formatted anyway, I would just try both. Install 8.1 and run a few tests. Then format again and install 8.6 and run the same tests. The tests should include a lot of "how does it feel" tests because you may find that

[Duo2400] Re: Upgrading Duo 2300 HD to iBook HD

2001-09-05 Thread Dave Perin
I did a lot of experimenting and testing on my 2300 about the same questions this summer. The difference in startup time between 8.1 and 8.6 was insignificant... they both booted in just about the same amount of time. Granted, my 2300 has 56 mb of RAM, so that might make 8.6 work better on my mac