Re: [dwm] I haven't gotten any messages from the dwm mailing list since 11/25?

2007-11-30 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 03:36:03PM -0500, Jeremy O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 09:32:46PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 09:32:31AM -0800, Amit Uttamchandani wrote: > > > I've not been getting any messages from the DWM mailing list > > > since 11/25. Any one el

Re: [dwm] I haven't gotten any messages from the dwm mailing list since 11/25?

2007-11-30 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 09:32:31AM -0800, Amit Uttamchandani wrote: > Hey guys, > > I've not been getting any messages from the DWM mailing list since 11/25. Any > one else have this problem? Please cc me. > Maybe dwm is so perfect no one has anything to say about it anymore?

Re: [dwm] Fibonacci patch ported to 4.6 (update)

2007-10-13 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 06:42:27PM -0400, Manny Calavera wrote: > Hey guys the patch isn't quite working for me completely, here is the > output I get when trying to patch: > > [f|~/code/dwm-4.5]% patch -p1 < /home/f/code/dwm-4.6-fibonacci.diff It's for 4.6 which is not yet released, so you have

Re: [dwm] piped input to dwm

2007-10-12 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 06:44:51PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Looks like your method introduces some variable lag ( < 1 sec) > between the echo command and the visualization on the statusbar. > I need the change to be almost immediate. > Wow, 1 sec lag, that's a lot! But "man tail" is your

Re: [dwm] Fibonacci patch ported to 4.6 (update)

2007-10-12 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 10:09:51AM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > Well, I'd prefer that declare the stuff you need from dwm.c as > externals, simply because they aren't declared as static there. > > At the beginning of fibonacci.c or .h add: > > extern Client *nexttiled(Client *c); > extern int

Re: [dwm] Fibonacci patch ported to 4.6

2007-10-12 Thread Xavier
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 08:49:08PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > I recreated dwm.h which includes the Client struct definition yet again. > Lemme know if you believe that other definitions might be useful > as well. > Apparently, fibonacci layout also needs other definitions indeed. I just move

Re: [dwm] Fibonacci patch ported to 4.6

2007-10-11 Thread Xavier
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 07:36:26PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 07:08:14PM +0200, Xavier wrote: > > Some users requested the fibonacci patch, which was only for 4.4.1. > > Even though I didn't use it, I tried to port it to 4.6, and it seems to w

[dwm] Fibonacci patch ported to 4.6

2007-10-11 Thread Xavier
Some users requested the fibonacci patch, which was only for 4.4.1. Even though I didn't use it, I tried to port it to 4.6, and it seems to work fine. Please review it :) Also, arg said earlier [1] that it should still be possible to keep a header file (fibonacci.h in this case) and include it in

Re: [dwm] Broken tiling after upgrading to dwm-4.5

2007-10-11 Thread Xavier
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 03:52:51PM +0300, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 01:13:13PM +0530, Arun G Nair wrote: > > > > > > screenshot: > > > http://xs.to/xs.php?h=xs320&d=07411&f=2007-10-08-222739_1280x1024_scrot.png > > > >Hey, what colorscheme are you using in vim ? I lik

Re: [dwm] key bindings / french layout

2007-10-10 Thread Xavier
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 09:57:28PM +0200, Adrien Barilly wrote: > You might also want to map the 'Multi_key' to a key of your keyboard (in > my case, RAlt, keycode 113); this would make the key a 'dead key': press > it, press the modifier and finally press the letter. Alright, that makes > 3 keys f

Re: [dwm] key bindings / french layout

2007-10-09 Thread Xavier
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 09:33:55PM +0200, Marek Bernat wrote: > Attached is my skdvorak keymap. I store it as > /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/skdvorak. > You will have to change the keycodes (e.g. ) to the ones matching us > keymap (mine match "us(dvorak)"): look into /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/us, >

Re: [dwm] key bindings / french layout

2007-10-09 Thread Xavier
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 09:29:50PM +0200, Riccardo Murri wrote: > This is the relevant snippet from my `~/.Xmodmap` (look for key names > in `/usr/include/X11/Xkeysimdef.h`; they are case-sensitive):: > > ! ##key ShiftMode_switch Shift+Mode_switch > ! ---

Re: [dwm] key bindings / french layout

2007-10-09 Thread Xavier
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 08:09:45PM +0200, Marek Bernat wrote: > Good way is to start with your default plain keymay ("us" usually, but I use > "usdvorak") and map (RAlt + $letter) to an accented $letter. I think it's > much better than any other way for using accented characters. ...especially > wh

Re: [dwm] key bindings / french layout

2007-10-09 Thread Xavier
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 06:59:54PM +0200, Jonas Pfenniger wrote: > I recommend the us-intl keyboard, which is much better if you need the > accents. > > Hm yes, actually that's what I first used for a while. It was alright for the accents indeed. But having accent keys act as dead keys is both

Re: [dwm] Broken tiling after upgrading to dwm-4.5

2007-10-08 Thread Xavier
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:58:45AM -0700, Amit Uttamchandani wrote: > Hey guys, > > I recently upgraded to dwm-4.5 from dwm-4.3 and I noticed improper tiling > when launching xterm and gvim. It looks like it doesn't span the whole > window. However, firefox, pidgin, and sylpheed don't have this

[dwm] key bindings / french layout

2007-10-05 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 11:38:53PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > Well the only reason I don't like with all those solutions are > the different keyboard layouts out there. Especially qwerty and > zxcvb are not ideal, because they differ in nearly all non-US layouts. > Just fyi, the current bind

Re: [dwm] bluegray

2007-10-01 Thread Xavier
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 11:45:07AM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > Fixed in hg tip's respectively. > Thanks. The only thing I change (or rather remove) now is Xft.dpi. I am still not sure if I really like dark on light colors, but imo, these vim / mutt / xterm colors are definitively usable and

Re: [dwm] bluegray

2007-09-30 Thread Xavier
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 08:37:43PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > It might be related to your screen settings. But I agree with > set number in vim, that still sucks (though I nearly never use > this). > It's a laptop lcd, the only thing I know how to configure is the brightness. It's less worse

Re: [dwm] bluegray

2007-09-30 Thread Xavier
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 07:44:44PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > Hi there, > > finally I settle with a new colorscheme, I call it bluegray > and it is already included in dextra, dmenu and dwm will use > it as default color scheme. > > Except the terminal background which is #ee, all other

Re: [dwm] dextra

2007-09-26 Thread Xavier
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 09:15:04PM +0200, Xavier wrote: > mutt colors : the arrays that display the threads are invisible (probably > white on white) This is apparently caused by the use of proggyclean font (in .Xdefaults). > vim colors : selected text is unreadable. I can't rea

Re: [dwm] dextra

2007-09-26 Thread Xavier
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 07:48:15PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > Hi there, > > heavily based on lavish's work I put together several config > files which should work fine with future releases of dwm/dmenu. > The repository is still work in progress, but might be of use > for some of you (it cont

[dwm] custom config.h handling

2007-09-22 Thread Xavier
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 11:36:35PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: > It should be possible to go back to the old > model and add some compile-error feature with each > incompatible config.h change for the people who > had problems. But wait, I thought dwm is for people > who know how to edit config.h, wa

[dwm] Unused space between clients

2007-09-16 Thread Xavier
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 03:13:17PM +0200, Damjan Vrencur wrote: > I checked the latest tip and it seems to work nice except that now I got some > unused space between clients. Screenshot: > http://lmmri.fri.uni-lj.si/damjan/dwmScreenshot.png > That space is much smaller here. And this is actual

Re: [dwm] Proper way of monitoring battery level in DWM

2007-09-15 Thread Xavier
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 11:04:15PM +0200, pancake wrote: > You will probably be using acpi instead of apm. > > Install 'powersave' or just type 'acpitool'. > > $ powersave -b > Battery: 100 % > AC is online. > > $ acpitool > Battery #1 : charged, 100.0%, -462:00:00 > AC adapter : on

Re: [dwm] arguments don't work with default dmenu command

2007-09-14 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 05:33:13PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 09:33:39PM +0200, Xavier wrote: > > In config.arg.h and config.default.h , dmenu is run like this : > > exe=`dmenu_path | dmenu` && exec $exe > > > > This doesn't wor

Re: [dwm] arguments don't work with default dmenu command

2007-09-13 Thread Xavier
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:21:51PM +0200, Panos P. wrote: > On 13-09-2007 21:33, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In config.arg.h and config.default.h , dmenu is run like this : > > exe=`dmenu_path | dmenu` && exec $exe > > > > This doesn't work

[dwm] arguments don't work with default dmenu command

2007-09-13 Thread Xavier
In config.arg.h and config.default.h , dmenu is run like this : exe=`dmenu_path | dmenu` && exec $exe This doesn't work for commands with arguments, eg "xterm -e top" or "import -w root root.png" or whatever. But running dmenu like this works fine (thanks to rob__ on #dwm for that hint ;) : exe=

Re: [dwm] removed _DWM_PROPERTIES, reverted ban/unban, please recheck

2007-08-22 Thread Xavier
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 07:10:02PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > Well I believe the last changes related to the stuff in the > subject habe been misleading. Please recheck hg tip, if it fixes > the issues (xine, and the others found in IRC log). > Xine issue is fixed now, thanks.

Re: [dwm] xine regression

2007-08-20 Thread Xavier
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 11:02:35AM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > Hi there, > > please check if hg tip works fine. If so I'm going to release it > in the evening or tomorrow. > I've a problem with xine on hg tip. I can display the control panel a first time (with g), then hides it. After that,

Re: [dwm] display bug with Firefox + Vimperator in tiling mode

2007-08-09 Thread Xavier
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 08:56:17PM +0200, Xavier wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 08:13:42PM +0200, Xavier wrote: > > > Maybe you could use an extension like "tab mix plus" to force > > > firefox to open all links in new tabs instead of new windows, I do that >

Re: [dwm] display bug with Firefox + Vimperator in tiling mode

2007-08-04 Thread Xavier
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 12:18:30AM +0300, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > That kind of behavior can be also be prevented by setting in firefox's > preferences under tabs, New pages should be opened in: a new tab. I already had this setting, it didn't work. As I said, what I had to configure in tab mix

Re: [dwm] display bug with Firefox + Vimperator in tiling mode

2007-08-01 Thread Xavier
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 05:25:48PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > Please recheck if hg tip fixes this issue. > I used to run last stable releases, but I switched to hg tip before reporting the issue, and it still has the same behavior.

Re: [dwm] display bug with Firefox + Vimperator in tiling mode

2007-07-31 Thread Xavier
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 08:13:42PM +0200, Xavier wrote: > > Maybe you could use an extension like "tab mix plus" to force > > firefox to open all links in new tabs instead of new windows, I do that > > and it works really well with dwm. > > > > I thought

Re: [dwm] display bug with Firefox + Vimperator in tiling mode

2007-07-31 Thread Xavier
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 07:49:58PM +0200, Martin Sander wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 07:36:51PM +0200, Xavier wrote: > > I'm using vimperator extension : http://vimperator.mozdev.org/ and have a > > little problem using it in dwm. > > It's very common for websit

Re: [dwm] Basic dwm usage question

2007-06-06 Thread Xavier
That's also a question I wanted to ask :) Even though I didn't notice any load increase when using 1 second (I'm just displaying the date), I didn't like the idea of having it to refresh so often needlessly. So I increased to 60 seconds, but ran into the problem you mention, so I set it to 5 secon

Re: [dwm] BUG? firefox save as dialog

2007-05-11 Thread Xavier
2007/5/11, Greg B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: thats true but if u do that (its the way i use it atm), the save as window expands too much covering 1/3 of the whole desktop and eben though u can make it smaller ,next time it opens again it has the same big size. that seems to depend on the filename too

Re: [dwm] BUG? firefox save as dialog

2007-05-10 Thread Xavier
2007/5/10, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: The funny thing is, that the dialog requests the size it had before it requested the size. Looks like a weird gtk bug, but I will see if it can be fixed somehow. this link seems to suggest it wasn't present in 2.10.9 and appeared in 2.10.10 http

Re: [dwm] BUG? firefox save as dialog

2007-05-10 Thread Xavier
2007/5/10, Kurt H Maier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Yes, on Slackware too, as soon as I upgraded to gtk 2.10.9. I found a thread a while ago on the Arch Linux forums[1] where people running e17, fluxbox, openbox, and dwm were all having the same problem. Someone in that thread solved the problem by dow