Bud Morin wrote:
Thank you, Ron, for telling it like it is!!
Bud Morin, K9ZT
Bull! See Joe's message about the Ad Hoc committee. He is the third member I
have heard who was shut down by the ARRL for proposing limitation on the Pactor
robots. Ron is just preaching the propagnada of the
Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
There's a very simple solution. If and when a replacement for
the Regulation by Bandwith petition is submitted, just include
an exception limiting private mailbox robots (be they PACTOR III
or anything else) to a small sub-band segment.
The Headquarters
Pay attention all you sheep that follow the League's Party line.
Here is someone
who HAS told it like it is. He is not the only member of that
committee who was
fed up.
--
John - W2AGN
John, I've heard you Pixx moan for 3 days about how bad the league
is, but that's all you do is Pi_xx
-CHAT] LBOTW]
Bud Morin wrote:
Thank you, Ron, for telling it like it is!!
Bud Morin, K9ZT
Bull! See Joe's message about the Ad Hoc committee. He is the third
member I
have heard who was shut down by the ARRL for proposing limitation on the
Pactor
robots. Ron is just preaching
And more important, it is controlled by the ARRL., who are NOT
friends of Amateur radio.
John - W2AGN
With respect: Nonsense !
Rag LA5HELife member
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
To post a message, DX related items only,
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] LBOTW
And more important, it is controlled by the ARRL., who are NOT
friends of Amateur radio.
John - W2AGN
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
To post
At 09:22 PM 8/26/2007, you wrote:
And more important, it is controlled by the ARRL., who are NOT
friends of Amateur radio.
John - W2AGN
John, just WHO DO you consider a friend of amateur radio. In your
response, please limit your discussion to the organization that IS a
friend of amateur
At 07:52 AM 8/27/2007, you wrote:
Sadly, there is no such organization. That makes the ARRL no less of a
tax-exempt publishing house, trying to make money off the shhep that
will follow
them anywhere.
--
John - W2AGN
John, that is exactly correct, and that is the reason I phrased my
Hello W2AGN,
W And more important, it is controlled by the ARRL., who are NOT
W friends of Amateur radio.
W John - W2AGN
At least, they do save my efforts and money, unlike of...
--
73...Art RX9TX
http://rx9tx.qrz.ru
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
Ron Notarius W3WN wrote:
It is your choice John, whether or not to join, or even like the League.
But to make such an inflammatory comment... what facts do you have to back
up that opinion?
1. Their recent attempt at Regulation by Bandwidth which was a transparent
attempt to make more room
I wonder if the people making anti-ARRL statements have even bothered to
talk to any of the ARRL officials? And if not, why not? I met Joel W5ZN
at the Dayton VHF banquet last year (2006). What a great guy! I've had
numerous chats with Dave K1ZZ. I always seem to cross paths with my
are going, you're going to have to do more
than kvetch on a reflector. Or nothing will change. It's that simple.
73, ron w3wn
-Original Message-
From: W2AGN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 10:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] LBOTW
At 06:19 PM 8/27/2007, Ron Notarius W3WN wrote:
If you don't like the way things are going, you're going to have to do more
than kvetch on a reflector.
Right. You can vote with your feet, as I have after many yrs of supporting
the league.
John K5MO
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback,
There's a very simple solution. If and when a replacement for
the Regulation by Bandwith petition is submitted, just include
an exception limiting private mailbox robots (be they PACTOR III
or anything else) to a small sub-band segment.
The Headquarters decision makers will never stand
-
From: Joe Subich, W4TV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 8:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] LBOTW
There's a very simple solution. If and when a replacement for
the Regulation by Bandwith petition is submitted, just include
OK... before we go too far astray, let's get this thread back on track here.
The issue of the thread is Use, or lack thereof, of Logbook of the World,
and why or why not. Delving into the reasons why many are unhappy or worse
with ARRL HQ is another subject, and frankly, it really does not
Thank you, Ron, for telling it like it is!!
Bud Morin, K9ZT
Original Message
Subject:RE: [DX-CHAT] LBOTW
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:19:12 -0400
From: Ron Notarius W3WN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
OK, well, let's
And u asked...
LogBook Of The World why I do not use this great service:
1. I log onto old fashioned paper.
2. I choose to do other much more interesting things than data entry.
3. I find LBOTW very difficult to use. And I have tried, and had help,
still failed to get it.
4.
Charles Harpole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(08/26/2007 21:35)
And u asked...
LogBook Of The World why I do not use this great service:
1. I log onto old fashioned paper.
2. I choose to do other much more interesting things than data entry.
3. I find LBOTW very difficult to use. And I
19 matches
Mail list logo