why DX does not use lbotw... re:
The same reason most others don't (see current EHAM survey) people
don't like them and would rather have paper cards.
John K5MO
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database:
I was just sending out some DX QSL
cards and did some quick calculations on percent return for my effort. Now these
are my numbers and my opinion and certainly may not reflect the ham
community in general.
The terms I use are:
PRICE = what it costs me to get a card
USAGE = my uninformed
, I believe), all of
which can be done electronically or on-line.
Give
it time.
73,
ron w3wn
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of John
MaikischSent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 8:42 PMTo:
dx-chat@njdxa.orgSubject: [DX-CHAT] [dx-chat
Ron, ur answer does not address my list of reasons why DX does not use
lbotw... re:
No computer... that does it... end of story which u acknowledged, but
-long upload times and expense... no answer
-difficulty of use... ur answer is just keep trying until u get it... not a
good answer to busy
At 09:19 PM 08/24/2006, Ron Notarius W3WN wrote:
The
confirmed perecentage for Logbook of the World will go up in time, as
more amateurs use it.
I'm actually surprised at my own numbers. As of tonight my LoTW hit rate
is 14.82%, not including the last 5 QSOs I made today. I'd say the
majority of
At 09:59 PM 08/24/2006, Charles Harpole wrote:
Ron, ur answer does not address my list of reasons why DX does not
use lbotw... re:
No computer... that does it... end of story which u acknowledged, but
-long upload times and expense... no answer
Long upload times? Are you joking? Even on a
