Hello Charles,
Perhaps I just happened to hit it right , but I had no problem in
working the guys at AH3D on 10 through 80 meters within 1 to 5 calls.
The only exception was 17 meters, where I had no propagation and could
only hear a whisper.
73,
Kent - K4MK
Charles Harpole wrote:
Is it
I also found them to be more difficult to work than I would have expected.
Like others have said, when they were loudest here on 160m and 40m, they
were calling CQ JA ...very frustrating. I understood the emphasis on
Europe.
Although I am definitely no expert on how things should work on the low
I also found them to be more difficult to work than I would have expected.
Like others have said, when they were loudest here on 160m and 40m, they¨were
calling CQ JA ...very frustrating. I understood the emphasis on Europe.
The only occation we noticed any emphasis on Europe was a window of
=
Eagles may soar but weasles dont get sucked into jet engines!
- Original Message -
From: Allan Bridget [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 9:40 AM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] [DX-NEWS] difficult to work AH3D?
I also found them to be more difficult
I did notice, when they first came on the air, that their 30 meter split was
odd. It went from +3 to +5 to +7 to +10 to +12... and so on. However, in
their defense, they've had a LOT of people calling them, and it only takes
one or two lids to disrupt things.
I did work them very early in the
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Charles Harpole wrote:
Is it just me or did others have an inordinately difficult time trying to
work AH3D ? I could not get into their split patterns, I was always on at
the time when they were interminably calling some other number a long way
from 4 only to switch to
Evening Charles, K4VUD:
Fortunately I found just the reverse of your bad luck. My timing must have
been just right on the AH3D fellows. I worked them on all bands, 160-10
Meters, and never spent more than 5 minutes on any band 80-10 Meters. It
took me two days on 160. Hi
My timing and luck must
