[Dx4win] 6.02 PSK31 ALT+R Problem - how reverse it?

2003-10-25 Thread Milan Gütter
Dr OMs, how can I reverse the ALT+R polarity? This problem continues since DX4WIN contains the PSK31 module. I'am using the YAESU FT1000MP MARK-V. Standard FT1000MP setting for PSK 31 is PKT and LSB. Not PKT and USB which dx4win needs. This setting is given by rig possibility to switch narrow 2

[Dx4win] LOtW

2003-10-25 Thread DL5NO
I am running a personal log-checker on the web (see www.dl5no.de), which is based on the records of the ADIF-export of DX4WIN and my QSL-records at the LOTW . Combination of both files is done on a linux-server with a Perl-routine, which compares several significant parts of the records (callsigns,

[Dx4win] telnet pro ll dx4win

2003-10-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i hope some one can help me out. i had a kenwood 570 and used a tnc with dx4win and it worked great, i just had to click on a spot and the rig went to that band and frec. i now have a icom pro ll and want to do the same thing but with telnet dxcluster.net.i i have ver. 5.03. thanks for any help th

[Dx4win] Support for LOTW

2003-10-25 Thread Steve
How about a separate reflector just for LOTW ? And when LOTW and ARRL move on from the "beta" and actually inform software developers of their strategic direction then modifications may be made rather than a change for change sake ! Sorry but LOTW is taking up a lot of bandwidth on here recently

[Dx4win] RE:Support for LOTW

2003-10-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul, I like your suggestions. This will let us update our DXCC confirmations, which is the main thing needed, and in no way keeps you from further integration if you decide to. At least for now, the one electronic confirmation flag would be sufficient. A couple other things to ponder? 1) D

[Dx4win] Support for LOTW

2003-10-25 Thread Larry Alkoff
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 13:56:38 -0400, Paul van der Eijk wrote: >Hi, > >I have been reading most of the exchanges about this topic, and >came up the following ideas / questions. > >1. Support for a few more 'confirm flags'; see below Absolutely. Probably only LOTW to begin with since eQSL's are not

[Dx4win] Dx4WIn with VE7CC

2003-10-25 Thread Herb Rosenberg
By the way, I am also using DXTELNET with DX4WIN. Thanks. - Original Message - From: "Herb Rosenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "dx4win" Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 17:15 Subject: [Dx4win] Dx4WIn with VE7CC > I just came across the VE7CC application, and it looks very cool. > > Wh

[Dx4win] Dx4WIn with VE7CC

2003-10-25 Thread Herb Rosenberg
I just came across the VE7CC application, and it looks very cool. What I am wondering is if there is any intergration of this application with DX4WIN? In other words, if I am already using my rtty window to telnet to a internet DX cluster, what if any benefit will I get for running the VE7CC appl

[Dx4win] Support for LOTW

2003-10-25 Thread WC7N
Paul keep it sweet and simple. If when I printed out the countries list it told me if it was electronic or card in hand I would be real happy. Rod WC7N - Original Message - From: "Paul van der Eijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 10:56 AM Subject: [Dx4win] Sup

[Dx4win] Support for LOTW

2003-10-25 Thread Jim Reisert AD1C
At 02:16 PM 10/25/2003, Steve wrote: >How about a separate reflector just for LOTW ? There is already one, with lots of traffic: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ARRL-LOTW/ I agree with Paul, let's try to keep discussions here specifically to LoTW and DX4WIN and how they work together.

[Dx4win] Support for LOTW

2003-10-25 Thread Mel
OK As I see it... I don't think you need to do anything about eQsl... It isn't necessary... It stands on it's own and keeps track of it's own awards. I've been using eQsl for quite a long time... And all you need is an easy way to upload the QSOs. Batch mode ADIF is fine... In future a real-time u

[Dx4win] Support for LOTW

2003-10-25 Thread Paul van der Eijk
Steve, I agree to some degree; I would like the discussions about LOTW to be limited to the DX4WIN context. Paul At 07:16 PM 10/25/03 +0100, Steve wrote: >How about a separate reflector just for LOTW ? > >And when LOTW and ARRL move on from the "beta" and actually inform software >developers of

[Dx4win] Support for LOTW

2003-10-25 Thread Mel
LOTW is out of Beta for some time now. And the reason for the bandwidth is because there is a real issue tracking award status with the program as it stands, if you use LOTW, and there is a real possibility that DX operations may adopt LOTW as the primary way of providing credit for DXCC as it's c

[Dx4win] Support for LOTW

2003-10-25 Thread WC7N
Hi Steve. There is a LOtW reflector. What I believe you saw here is concerns that are limited to use with DX4WIN. Rod WC7N - Original Message - From: "Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 11:16 AM Subject: Re: [Dx4win] Support for LOTW > How about a separat

[Dx4win] Support for LOTW

2003-10-25 Thread Paul van der Eijk
Hi, I have been reading most of the exchanges about this topic, and came up the following ideas / questions. 1. Support for a few more 'confirm flags'; see below 2. Add a function to the logbook import mechanism to use the QSOs to set the confirm flag in the existing log. The imported QSOs will

[Dx4win] disconnect fix

2003-10-25 Thread n3drk
Thanks for everyone who responded to my post. I was not aware of this feature and the reason I no longer use the program. I am going to VE7CC website and download the latest and work with it today. Thanks Guys and 73's john

[Dx4win] disconnect fix

2003-10-25 Thread Mel
You missed the point John... VE7CC is running on your computer as a node... You then connect DX4Win to it, and it's exactly the same as connecting to any other cluster... But the connection won't drop because it is a loopback connection to your own computer. Anyway, it's something Paul should addr

[Dx4win] disconnect fix

2003-10-25 Thread n3drk
Ok Don, that is the downside of the VE7CC packet cluster program. It will not go into your dx4win logbook and highlight in the 9 or so colors to make you aware it is a new country you need to work, or a new band, or a new mode. I am going to stick with the present DX4WIN packet cluster even th

[Dx4win] Telnet connections

2003-10-25 Thread Don Hinte
To All, I am running an Ar-Cluster and have been for the last 4 years. Telnet address is dxc-ka5eyh.drhnet.com. I also use DX4WIN, it stays connected for weeks on end. Some ISP will not alow a full time connect. If you need to test this, try useing my node by telnet useing DX4Win, if you get dro

[Dx4win] Disconnects

2003-10-25 Thread Bill Clark
Well, I might as well have a go at this. I now connect to clusters via broadband wireless and do have an excellent connection as I am very near the signal source. Previously, I used a dial up connection, a little less reliable. Before that, two meter packet, even less reliable. Now, I can ping t

[Dx4win] disconnect fix

2003-10-25 Thread Don Price
Mark K6FG,=20 Dx4win has not provisions to "stay alive" or ping the cluster. What has = worked very well is to download VE7CC's program AR users (http://www.ve7cc.net )and run this in the background. It will connect = you to your telnet or packet cluster and will track the disconnects, = user sets