[Dx4win] MMTTY and DX4WIN

2004-09-13 Thread WC7N
You make a very valid point Jim. I know MMTTY would generate a lots of interest. I use it and like it so well I put the PK-232 back in its box and stored it. Rod WC7N - Original Message - From: "Jim Reisert AD1C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 10:48 AM Subj

[Dx4win] MMTTY and DX4WIN

2004-09-13 Thread Jim Reisert AD1C
--- WC7N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to see MMTTY as part of DX4WIN but right now there are a bunch > of things that need to be fixed and would like to see that done first. Agreed, Rod. However, a free upgrade to a program that is just bug fixes won't generate any new interest in

[Dx4win] MMTTY and DX4WIN

2004-09-13 Thread Joe - WDØM
Truth be known - I have three OTHER logging programs. I use them all. And I absolutely agree. Vote with your checkbook/credit cards. 73, Joe WD?M At 11:17 AM 9/13/2004, Bob Check wrote: >it should be up to the consumer who buys the product, after 4 years I gave >up and am switching programs.

[Dx4win] MMTTY and DX4WIN

2004-09-13 Thread Tom LeClerc W1TJL
--- Joe - WDØM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > DX4WIN should incorporate the ability to link to MMTTY, and make it as > transparent as possible. > Here's the "licensing" language for developers, which definitively resolves > the issue: > "Commercial Programs: > "If you distribute a commercial

[Dx4win] MMTTY and DX4WIN

2004-09-13 Thread WC7N
I would like to see MMTTY as part of DX4WIN but right now there are a bunch of things that need to be fixed and would like to see that done first. Rod WC7N - Original Message - From: "Joe - WD?M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 8:15 AM Subject: [Dx4win] MMTTY a

[Dx4win] RTTY

2004-09-13 Thread Joe - WDØM
Happy to help, Jim - hope that we find MMTTY fully integrated into DX4WIN very, very soon to make our favorite logging program even better! Cheers, Joe WD?M At 09:30 AM 9/13/2004, you wrote: >Joe, thanks for ending the speculation! > >- Jim > >--- Joe - WD?M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Her

[Dx4win] RTTY

2004-09-13 Thread Jim Reisert AD1C
--- Pete Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That may be, but my impression was that DX4WIN integrated a .dll for PSK > into the program itself, and that THAT would be a violation of MMTTY's > restriction. Or perhaps MMTTY has changed their language since I last > researched this several years

[Dx4win] RTTY

2004-09-13 Thread Pete Smith
At 09:42 AM 9/13/2004, Joe - WD?M wrote: >N1MM Logger requires (as do other programs incorporating MMTTY) that the >RTTY program be downloaded separately, rather then being distributed along >with the logging program, then installed separately. This does NOT >violate the intent of MMTTY's auth

[Dx4win] RTTY

2004-09-13 Thread Joe - WDØM
N1MM Logger requires (as do other programs incorporating MMTTY) that the RTTY program be downloaded separately, rather then being distributed along with the logging program, then installed separately. This does NOT violate the intent of MMTTY's author. How you use the freeware program is up to

[Dx4win] RTTY

2004-09-13 Thread Pete Smith
At 04:12 PM 9/12/2004, Kostas SV1DPI wrote: >Please add me to the list also... > >I work a computer with xp i can't run the mmtty right because ptt and radio >control is in same port. >dx4win learned me abt psk but i am not satisfied with it now. I think that >decoding is much worst from first ti

[Dx4win] RTTY

2004-09-13 Thread Kostas SV1DPI
Please add me to the list also... I work a computer with xp i can't run the mmtty right because ptt and radio control is in same port. dx4win learned me abt psk but i am not satisfied with it now. I think that decoding is much worst from first time. Digipan is much much better. I use writelog for