Message -
From: Mike VA3MW [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dx4win Dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2006 9:05 PM
Subject: [Dx4win] DX4win 6.03
Does someone have an install copy of DX4Win 6.03? I lost a hard drive,
and although I thought I had it backed up, all I have is 6.02.
If you
Does someone have an install copy of DX4Win 6.03? I lost a hard drive, and
although I thought I had it backed up, all I have is 6.02.
If you do, let me know off the reflector and I'll provide an FTP site where
it can be uploaded.
Thanks.. Mike VA3MW
Paul:
I don't understand, and I apologize. If I have one QSO
that qualifies me for a new DXCC SSB and a new DXCC
for 17m, I think it will only output one QSO for submission.
All QSOs are output as band/mode contacts.
Otherwise, what would the DXCC SSB QSO be output as?
73, Byron
At 01:52 PM
Brian,
Looking at your log for prefix=V6
You have one QSO V63EC/P 17M CW
This QSO was checked for mix, band and mode
You have one entry in the submission for V6:
V63CQ 10M SSB
This single QSO is used for 10M AND for SSB
There should be additional entries in your submission that are
used twice
Band stored when logging a QSO:
I recently upgraded to version 6.03 and when logging a QSO without having a
CAT system connected but only a telnet cluster it stores the band info of
the last DX cluster spot instead of the band I selected. Previous version is
worked fine. If I connect the CAT
Has anyone found issues with the DXCC award submission?
I'm confused that it generates a listing of 1,207 QSOs, but
the summary will say it has 1,175 submitted afterwards. Any
thoughts on the missing 32?
It looks like DX4WIN is simply taking the Confirmed Total
and subtracting the Checked total
Not surprising if you provide remote access permission
by individual software package. DX4WIN 6.03 isn't the
same executable that 6.02 was, so you need to give
permission again.
73, Byron
At 01:21 PM 5/31/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem with the packet cluster I was having was
I'll add a note to my upgrade tips.
At 06:55 PM 5/31/2004, ARS NZ3O (Byron) FM29fx wrote:
Not surprising if you provide remote access permission
by individual software package. DX4WIN 6.03 isn't the
same executable that 6.02 was, so you need to give
permission again.
73, Byron
--
Jim Reisert
DX4WIM Users...
OK...I give up and need your help!
The help menu is useless for LOTW questions. There has been so much
discussion, though fragmented, on the reflector on how to do LOTW upload and
downloads that I am snowed!
1. I have uploaded all my QSO's to LOTW, pre 6.03so there is no
?Milan_G=FCtter?=)
Date: Mon May 17 10:32:18 2004
Subject: [Dx4win] DX4WIN 6.03 Countries listing problem
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I have imported my Lotw log into 6.03.
The number of DXCC increase - thats good for me!
The one of my new DXCC is the TO4WW (FR/J
Franson)
Date: Mon May 17 10:40:32 2004
Subject: [Dx4win] DX4WIN 6.03 LOTW Upload
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tried the 01/01/1901 - the filter selects all 58,000+ QSOs. But the SET
UPLOAD FLAG still only sets 257 of them.
From: Jim Reisert AD1C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 10:00 AM
Subject: Re: [Dx4win] DX4WIN 6.03
--- Lou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The help menu is useless for LOTW questions. There has been so much
discussion, though fragmented, on the reflector on how to do LOTW upload
and
downloads that I am snowed
Milan, I've got the same problem here. LoTW gave me two new band/countries
for the DXCC Challenge not confirmed by paper cards. The Reports / DXCC /
Listing / Select ALL / ALL modes, ALL doesn't show a C for them, although
the Upl Cnf flag in the QSO window is Y.
It would be nice to have the
Paul...anything?
Lou N2TU
Lou, I believe the powers that be have shut up shop and have gone to the
Dayton hamfest !! I recall seeing an email stating that any comments and/or
problems will be addressed either at Dayton or when they get back.
Looks like the DX amongst us will probably have to
Paul...anything?
Lou N2TU
Lou, I believe the powers that be have shut up shop and have gone to the
Dayton hamfest !! I recall seeing an email stating that any comments and/or
problems will be addressed either at Dayton or when they get back.
Looks like the DX amongst us will probably have to
PROTECTED] (Joe)
Date: Tue May 11 15:27:17 2004
Subject: [Dx4win] DX4WIN 6.03
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't recall mentioning anything about gravity and its impact upon the
sky. Just stating a fact. I
How come after every program update, there are days upon days of
questions, problems, etc? Shouldn't an update be relatively
seamless? It should archive what is necessary and then replace what
needs to be replaced, with options along the way, if necessary. It
shouldn't create new program
/sale.htm
- Original Message -
From: Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 7:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Dx4win] DX4WIN 6.03
I don't recall mentioning anything about gravity and its impact upon the
sky. Just stating a fact. I checked my log
18 matches
Mail list logo
