[Dx4win] RTTY SOLUTION FOR DX4WIN users under WIN98 & W2K & XP

2002-12-16 Thread ON4AOI
Hi Jim and others, > >HOW TO IS VERY SIMPLE. > > Not nearly as simple as using with WriteLog. That is what people would like > to see. I for one have no room for another PC in the shack and currently a > shortage of COM ports on the one I do have. Using an API interface this way > makes it much mo

[Dx4win] RTTY SOLUTION FOR DX4WIN users under WIN98 & W2K & XP

2002-12-16 Thread Jim Rhodes
Actually I get by just fine with MMTTY running in it's own window & logging in Dx4Win. As a future upgrade it would be nice to have it more closely interfaced, in fact that, to me anyway, would make more sense than the PSK31 interface. And no, WriteLog does not include the MMTTY files, you have

[Dx4win] RTTY SOLUTION FOR DX4WIN users under WIN98 & W2K & XP

2002-12-16 Thread ON4AOI
Ramón & others, For the record MMTTY is not included in the DX4WIN install software because the AUTHOR of MMTTY JE3HHT doesn't allow this. See his WebPages "Commercial Programs are not allowed to include this file", But can be downloaded and used FREE by any HAMRADIO station. Here is the link whe

[Dx4win] RTTY SOLUTION FOR DX4WIN users under WIN98 & W2K & XP

2002-12-16 Thread Jim Rhodes
At 02:23 AM 12/16/02, you wrote: >HOW TO IS VERY SIMPLE. Not nearly as simple as using with WriteLog. That is what people would like to see. I for one have no room for another PC in the shack and currently a shortage of COM ports on the one I do have. Using an API interface this way makes it m

[Dx4win] RTTY SOLUTION FOR DX4WIN users under WIN98 & W2K & XP

2002-12-16 Thread Jim Reisert
--- ON4AOI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What would you say if you have to pay for an option that > isn't included on your install disk(s) and should be downloaded somewhere > else if you don't have internet? If you choose to pay for a DX4WIN upgrade, there are surely many reasons besides a new R