Hi jrw,
> i think there are at least 4 public gold list archives out there, most
> of which do some obfuscation of source email address, but an
industrious
> individual could certainly reconstruct subscriber addresses. but there
> are almost certainly harvesters subscribed to all the lists, so t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 02:18:10PM +0300, Danny Van den Berghe wrote:
> Is there really a need for list archives here?
>
> Does it serve any purpose, other than providing the address-harvesting
> bots with what must look almost like a real 'goldmine'
> Sure anybody *could* choose to arichive the messages but whether they do
> so is another matter. I doubt it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
hi nick,
i think there are at least 4 public gold list archives out there, most
of which do some obfuscation of source email address, but an industriou
> Is there really a need for list archives here?
>
> Does it serve any purpose, other than providing the address-harvesting
> bots with
> what must look almost like a real 'goldmine' in their eyes?
>
> Why not turn these archives OFF ,and delete them?
I must say I have never looked at the archiv
>
> I think the culprit is the list archive which is open to
> address-harvesting bots.
>
> Can something be done about it?
Hi,
Is there really a need for list archives here?
Does it serve any purpose, other than providing the address-harvesting bots with
what must look almost like a real 'gol
At 12:03 PM +0200 6/5/03, Fidex Marketing wrote:
...
>I think the culprit is the list archive which is open to
>address-harvesting bots.
The archive is useful, and one of the things I refuse to do
about spam is give up useful things if that can be avoided,
since doing that lets the spammers win. O
