Being an ex-banker (I'm proud of the 'ex' not the 'banker') before joining
the tech crowd at a time it wasn't quite fashionable yet, I can still see
how both sides think. The problem with any online system that has suits
involved is that they believe that throwing money at a problem will surely
that about sums it up...
What happens when one of those small services gets big. Can they keep the
service level and drive they had when small? that is the trick.
Gordon
Cheers,
Robert.
budget privacy website hosting
http://www.cyberica.net
e-commerce e-business services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi James, thank you for your generosity in sharing your
thoughts about beenz/flooz etc in our exchange I asked,
and you said,
Is DBC a viable model in the long term or NOT?
What is it going to take to gain broad adoption? I'm
not getting any younger. Let's get
Is DBC a viable model in the long term or NOT?
I read the whole thing but couldn't figure out what DBC stood for. Did the
author mean GBC, (Gold-Backed Currencies)? Is he saying that gold-backed
currencies need a complete accounting system to accommodate them before
businesses will use
I believe DBC keeps failing because it's not convenient enough and the
expenditure of time and concentration are higher than just paying the 5%
credit card fees.
I think Beenz and Flooze (Digital Based Currencies) failed because they
are not a direct money for goods or money for service. I
--On 18 August 2001 08:05 -0700 Jeff Fitzmyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe DBC keeps failing because it's not convenient enough and the
expenditure of time and concentration are higher than just paying the 5%
credit card fees.
I think Beenz and Flooze (Digital Based Currencies)
