Mr Evans has categorically disputed these alleged claims and is now
struggling to find the 10,000 dollars required to defend himself and
his family against this heavy handed attack as a reward for the
loyalty he displayed whilst working for e-gold.
What damages is GSR seeking? It's not
Chris Lord-Van Voorst wrote:
There are those of us on the e-gold list who don't even know who Charles
Evans is. No one has yet to explain why Evans deserves funding in his
fight against e-gold. If there's more to the story, I'd like to hear it.
Until then, any pleas on Evans' behalf are
It is not a fight against e-gold. It is a defense against the fact of being
sued.
Donating to a fund that will be used against somebody/some corporation
that you have a grudge against doesn't have anything to do with it?
If this is just a defense fund for defendants of lawsuits, why single
There are those of us on the e-gold list who don't even know who Charles
Evans is. No one has yet to explain why Evans deserves funding in his
fight against e-gold. If there's more to the story, I'd like to hear it.
Until then, any pleas on Evans' behalf are meaningless, in my opinion...
There are those of us on the e-gold list who don't even know who Charles
Evans is. No one has yet to explain why Evans deserves funding in his
fight against e-gold. If there's more to the story, I'd like to hear it.
Until then, any pleas on Evans' behalf are meaningless, in my
