Re: [E1000-devel] 82599ES 10-Gigabit connected to 1G port

>-Original Message- >From: Agnel Varghese [mailto:agn8...@gmail.com] >Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 9:44 PM >To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >Subject: [E1000-devel] 82599ES 10-Gigabit connected to 1G port > >I have a 10G 82599ES intel card on Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS , details below : >

Re: [E1000-devel] X550EM_X_SFP "lockup" / link issues

>-Original Message- >From: Sylvain Munaut [mailto:s.mun...@whatever-company.com] >Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 5:48 AM >To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >Subject: [E1000-devel] X550EM_X_SFP "lockup" / link issues > >Hi, > > >I'm having trouble with a X550 card getting "locked up",

Re: [E1000-devel] rx queue

>-Original Message- >From: Łukasz Chrustek [mailto:luk...@chrustek.net] >Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2016 3:06 AM >To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >Subject: [E1000-devel] rx queue > >Hello, > >I have strange problem, my system has two 12-core procesors, when >setting

Re: [E1000-devel] rx_missed_errors grows while rx_no_buffer does not

>-Original Message- >From: Michał Purzyński [mailto:michalpurzyns...@gmail.com] >Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 1:10 AM >To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >Subject: [E1000-devel] rx_missed_errors grows while rx_no_buffer does not > >Hello. > >On my IDS workload with af_packet I can

Re: [E1000-devel] Setting speed of ixgbe to be 1000

>-Original Message- >From: Kevin Wilson [mailto:wkev...@gmail.com] >Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 11:53 AM >To: Tantilov, Emil S <emil.s.tanti...@intel.com> >Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Setting speed of

Re: [E1000-devel] Setting speed of ixgbe to be 1000

>-Original Message- >From: Kevin Wilson [mailto:wkev...@gmail.com] >Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 11:18 AM >To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >Subject: [E1000-devel] Setting speed of ixgbe to be 1000 > >Hello, >I have an IXGBE connected by a direct attach cable to a 3com 1GB

Re: [E1000-devel] i40e bonding promisc issue

>-Original Message- >From: zhuyj [mailto:zyjzyj2...@gmail.com] >Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 1:56 AM >To: Laszlo Fekete <blackl...@ktk.bme.hu> >Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tantilov, Emil S ><emil.s.tanti...@intel.com>; jay.vosbu...@canonical.c

Re: [E1000-devel] i40e bonding promisc issue

>-Original Message- >From: Laszlo Fekete [mailto:blackl...@ktk.bme.hu] >Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 1:13 AM >To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] i40e bonding promisc issue > >Okay, it seems probably too long the message so let's try with pastebin. If you

Re: [E1000-devel] i40e bonding promisc issue

>-Original Message- >From: Laszlo Fekete [mailto:blackl...@ktk.bme.hu] >Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 3:53 AM >To: zhuyj <zyjzyj2...@gmail.com> >Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tantilov, Emil S ><emil.s.tanti...@intel.com>; jay.vosbu...@canonical.c

Re: [E1000-devel] dmesg warnings for ixgbe on Xeon D-1540

>-Original Message- >From: Paul Sturm [mailto:pst...@computervoice.com] >Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 8:00 PM >To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >Subject: [E1000-devel] dmesg warnings for ixgbe on Xeon D-1540 > >Using kernel 4.4.6 and ixgbe 4.3.15 > >[ 0.784722] Intel(R) 10 Gigabit PCI

Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe 4.3.13 x Linux 4.5.0 = Compilation Faillure

>-Original Message- >From: Brandeburg, Jesse [mailto:jesse.brandeb...@intel.com] >Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 10:26 AM >To: Ronciak, John ; Fujinaka, Todd >; Skidmore, Donald C >; Leonardo Amaral - Listas

Re: [E1000-devel] Setting speed to 10GB on 2x40 XL710 FVL nic

>-Original Message- >From: Kevin Wilson [mailto:wkev...@gmail.com] >Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 12:43 AM >To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >Subject: [E1000-devel] Setting speed to 10GB on 2x40 XL710 FVL nic > >Hi, >Is it possible to set the speed to 10GB on 2x40 FVL nic? > >For me

Re: [E1000-devel] [linux-nics] e1000e: initialization breaks IPMI support on 80003ES2LAN

>-Original Message- >From: linux-nics-boun...@isotope.jf.intel.com [mailto:linux-nics- >boun...@isotope.jf.intel.com] On Behalf Of Lucas Nussbaum >Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 7:59 AM >To: Linux Kernel Network Developers >Cc: Linux NICS

Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe: get link speed as a slave nic unrelated with link

>-Original Message- >From: zyjzyj2...@gmail.com [mailto:zyjzyj2...@gmail.com] >Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2016 11:28 PM >To: zyjzyj2...@gmail.com; Tantilov, Emil S; Schmitt, Phillip J; Kirsher, >Jeffrey T; net...@vger.kernel.org; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; >Shtei

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH 1/1] ixgbe: get link speed as a slave nic unrelated with link up

>-Original Message- >From: zyjzyj2...@gmail.com [mailto:zyjzyj2...@gmail.com] >Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2016 11:28 PM >To: zyjzyj2...@gmail.com; Tantilov, Emil S; Schmitt, Phillip J; Kirsher, >Jeffrey T; net...@vger.kernel.org; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; >Shtei

Re: [E1000-devel] [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 2/2] ixgbe: restrict synchronization of link_up and speed

>-Original Message- >From: zhuyj [mailto:zyjzyj2...@gmail.com] >Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 9:42 PM >To: Tantilov, Emil S; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Brandeburg, Jesse; Nelson, >Shannon; Wyborny, Carolyn; Skidmore, Donald C; Allan, Bruce W; Ronciak, >John; Williams, Mi

Re: [E1000-devel] [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 2/2] ixgbe: restrict synchronization of link_up and speed

>-Original Message- >From: zhuyj [mailto:zyjzyj2...@gmail.com] >Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 12:20 AM >To: Tantilov, Emil S; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Brandeburg, Jesse; Nelson, >Shannon; Wyborny, Carolyn; Skidmore, Donald C; Allan, Bruce W; Ronciak, >John; Williams, Mi

Re: [E1000-devel] [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 2/2] ixgbe: restrict synchronization of link_up and speed

>-Original Message- >From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-boun...@lists.osuosl.org] On >Behalf Of zyjzyj2...@gmail.com >Sent: Monday, December 28, 2015 6:32 PM >To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Brandeburg, Jesse; Nelson, Shannon; Wyborny, >Carolyn; Skidmore, Donald C; Allan, Bruce W;

Re: [E1000-devel] [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 2/2] ixgbe: restrict synchronization of link_up and speed

>-Original Message- >From: zhuyj [mailto:zyjzyj2...@gmail.com] >Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 6:49 PM >To: Tantilov, Emil S; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Brandeburg, Jesse; Nelson, >Shannon; Wyborny, Carolyn; Skidmore, Donald C; Allan, Bruce W; Ronciak, >John; Williams, Mi

Re: [E1000-devel] [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/1] ixgbe: force to synchronize reporting "link on" and getting speed and duplex

>-Original Message- >From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-boun...@lists.osuosl.org] On >Behalf Of zyjzyj2...@gmail.com >Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 10:47 PM >To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Brandeburg, Jesse; Nelson, Shannon; Wyborny, >Carolyn; Skidmore, Donald C; Allan, Bruce W;

Re: [E1000-devel] [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/1] ixgbe: force to synchronize reporting "link on" and getting speed and duplex

>-Original Message- >From: zhuyj [mailto:zyjzyj2...@gmail.com] >Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 6:28 PM >To: Tantilov, Emil S; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Brandeburg, Jesse; Nelson, >Shannon; Wyborny, Carolyn; Skidmore, Donald C; Allan, Bruce W; Ronciak, >John; Williams, Mi

Re: [E1000-devel] [Intel-wired-lan] [V2 PATCH 1/1] ixgbe: force to synchronize reporting "link on" and

>-Original Message- >From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-boun...@lists.osuosl.org] On >Behalf Of zhuyj >Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 9:11 PM >To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Brandeburg, Jesse; Nelson, Shannon; Wyborny, >Carolyn; Skidmore, Donald C; Allan, Bruce W; Ronciak, John;

Re: [E1000-devel] IXGBE X520-DA2 82599ES SFP+ DA Is carrier detection working?

>-Original Message- >From: Peter Schmitt [mailto:p.schmitt...@gmx.net] >Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 1:40 AM >To: Tantilov, Emil S; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] IXGBE X520-DA2 82599ES SFP+ DA Is carrier >detection working? > >Hi

Re: [E1000-devel] IXGBE X520-DA2 82599ES SFP+ DA Is carrier detection working?

>-Original Message- >From: Peter Schmitt [mailto:p.schmitt...@gmx.net] >Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 12:18 AM >To: Tantilov, Emil S; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] IXGBE X520-DA2 82599ES SFP+ DA Is carrier >detection working? > >

Re: [E1000-devel] IXGBE X520-DA2 82599ES SFP+ DA Is carrier detection working?

>-Original Message- >From: Peter Schmitt [mailto:p.schmitt...@gmx.net] >Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 8:02 AM >To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >Subject: [E1000-devel] IXGBE X520-DA2 82599ES SFP+ DA Is carrier detection >working? > >Hi everyone, > >I am connecting two boxes using

Re: [E1000-devel] Bug when editing flow director rules in ixgbe

>-Original Message- >From: Stuart Grace [mailto:stuart.gr...@bbc.co.uk] >Sent: Friday, November 27, 2015 6:08 AM >To: 'e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net' >Subject: [E1000-devel] Bug when editing flow director rules in ixgbe > >There is a bug in ixgbe relating to creating and deleting flow

Re: [E1000-devel] out-of-tree ixgbevf driver failing to load when used on host

>-Original Message- >From: Alexander Duyck [mailto:alexander.du...@gmail.com] >Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 11:55 AM >To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >Subject: [E1000-devel] out-of-tree ixgbevf driver failing to load when used >on host > >So I have gotten a few reports about the

Re: [E1000-devel] Random crashes with the IXGBE driver.

>-Original Message- >From: Nikolay Borisov [mailto:ker...@kyup.com] >Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 8:46 AM >To: Skidmore, Donald C; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >Cc: SiteGround Operations >Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Random crashes with the IXGBE driver. > > > >On 11/16/2015 06:40

Re: [E1000-devel] Enabling RSS options?

>-Original Message- >From: Aris Pikeas [mailto:aris.pik...@vizio.com] >Sent: Monday, November 09, 2015 9:49 PM >To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >Subject: [E1000-devel] Enabling RSS options? > >I've built the latest (2.16.4) version of ixgbevf on Ubuntu 15.04. I have >an issue where

Re: [E1000-devel] Fake TX hangs

>-Original Message- >From: Tal Abudi [mailto:talab...@gmail.com] >Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 8:44 AM >To: Skidmore, Donald C >Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Fake TX hangs > >Hi >It also happens on a different set of hardware, Flow Control is off in

Re: [E1000-devel] Ouf of tree vs in tree kernel ixgbevf driver

>-Original Message- >From: Emmanuel Kasper [mailto:emman...@libera.cc] >Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 1:05 AM >To: Tantilov, Emil S; Fujinaka, Todd; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Ouf of tree vs in tree kernel ixgbevf driver > >Hi

Re: [E1000-devel] Ouf of tree vs in tree kernel ixgbevf driver

>-Original Message- >From: Emmanuel Kasper [mailto:emman...@libera.cc] >Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 7:39 AM >To: Fujinaka, Todd; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Ouf of tree vs in tree kernel ixgbevf driver > >On 09/06/2015 01:51 AM, Fujinaka, Todd wrote:

Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe X557-AT2 Auto-Negotiation Problem

>-Original Message- >From: Tom Walsh [mailto:expressweb...@gmail.com] >Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2015 6:16 PM >To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >Subject: [E1000-devel] ixgbe X557-AT2 Auto-Negotiation Problem > >We have a new motherboard from SuperMicro X10SDV-TLN4F that uses the Xeon

Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe X557-AT2 Auto-Negotiation Problem

>-Original Message- >From: Tom Walsh [mailto:expressweb...@gmail.com] >Sent: Monday, August 31, 2015 12:12 PM >To: Tantilov, Emil S >Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe X557-AT2 Auto-Negotiation Problem > >Emil, > >When

Re: [E1000-devel] ioatdma problem with Intel BIOS

-Original Message- From: Craig Gallek [mailto:cgal...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 8:16 PM To: Tantilov, Emil S Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [E1000-devel] ioatdma problem with Intel BIOS On 2015-08-11 10:42 PM, Tantilov, Emil S wrote: -Original

Re: [E1000-devel] ioatdma problem with Intel BIOS

-Original Message- From: Craig Gallek [mailto:cgal...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 6:21 PM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] ioatdma problem with Intel BIOS I'm experiencing the splat below with the ioatdma driver with an Intel BIOS. I'm having

Re: [E1000-devel] ethtool and perfect match filters - how to use it?

-Original Message- From: Michał Purzyński [mailto:michalpurzyns...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 1:46 PM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] ethtool and perfect match filters - how to use it? The 82599 data sheet says, that masks must match for all the

Re: [E1000-devel] ethtool -L fails on 82598 controllers (tc IXGBE_DCB_MAX_TRAFFIC_CLASS)

-Original Message- From: Tal Abudi [mailto:talab...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 8:54 AM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] ethtool -L fails on 82598 controllers (tc IXGBE_DCB_MAX_TRAFFIC_CLASS) Hi I'm using ethtool -L to change the number of RX

Re: [E1000-devel] dropped packets on ixgbe centos 7.1

-Original Message- From: Jason Keltz [mailto:j...@cse.yorku.ca] Sent: Friday, July 03, 2015 11:19 AM To: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net Subject: [E1000-devel] dropped packets on ixgbe centos 7.1 Hi. I have 3 Dell R620 systems that have dual Intel 10G X540-AT2 running CentOS 7.1 and oVirt

Re: [E1000-devel] CONFIG_IXGBE_DISABLE_PACKET_SPLIT in ixgbe nic driver

-Original Message- From: zhuyj [mailto:zyjzyj2...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2015 11:24 PM To: Tantilov, Emil S Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] CONFIG_IXGBE_DISABLE_PACKET_SPLIT in ixgbe nic driver I think this option will result in the failure of the packets that need to be ICV check

Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe and using iptables/SYNPROXY causes random system resets

-Original Message- From: Christian Ruppert [mailto:id...@qasl.de] Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 12:34 PM To: Tantilov, Emil S Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net Subject: RE: [E1000-devel] ixgbe and using iptables/SYNPROXY causes random system resets On 2015-06-26 21:15, Tantilov, Emil S wrote

Re: [E1000-devel] CONFIG_IXGBE_DISABLE_PACKET_SPLIT in ixgbe nic driver

-Original Message- From: zhuyj [mailto:zyjzyj2...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 2:06 AM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] CONFIG_IXGBE_DISABLE_PACKET_SPLIT in ixgbe nic driver Hi, all From ixgbe 3.8.21, CONFIG_IXGBE_DISABLE_PACKET_SPLIT is introduced

Re: [E1000-devel] 82599 / ixgbe indirection table and large RSS support

-Original Message- From: Marek Majkowski [mailto:maje...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2015 6:24 AM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] 82599 / ixgbe indirection table and large RSS support Hi! My understanding is that neither vanilla kernel ixgbe driver, nor

Re: [E1000-devel] Couple of issues in ixgbe and ethregs

-Original Message- From: Alexander Duyck [mailto:alexander.du...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 6:26 PM Subject: Couple of issues in ixgbe and ethregs First I am seeing an issue where switching from the out-of-tree driver to the in kernel driver for ixgbe w/ x540 is causing

Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe LLIpush does not seem to work correctly

-Original Message- From: js...@attotech.com [mailto:js...@attotech.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 11:16 AM Subject: [E1000-devel] ixgbe LLIpush does not seem to work correctly I originally posted this message on Intel's Wired Ethernet forum, and after much back and forth they suggested

Re: [E1000-devel] Intel x520 RX MAC filter support?

-Original Message- From: Liam Randall [mailto:liam.rand...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 9:15 PM Subject: [E1000-devel] Intel x520 RX MAC filter support? tl;dr Are their plans to support RX ethernet address filters for the Intel x520? There is no support for Ethernet address

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH] ixgbevf: Set rx hash type for ingress packets

-Original Message- From: Du, Fan Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:28 AM Subject: RE: [PATCH] ixgbevf: Set rx hash type for ingress packets -Original Message- From: Tantilov, Emil S Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 11:42 AM To: Du, Fan; Kirsher, Jeffrey T Cc: intel-wired

Re: [E1000-devel] [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] ixgbe: Specify rx hash type wrt rx desc RSS type

-Original Message- From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-boun...@lists.osuosl.org] On Behalf Of Fan Du Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 11:56 PM Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] ixgbe: Specify rx hash type wrt rx desc RSS type RSS could be leveraged by taking account L4 src/dst

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH] ixgbevf: Set rx hash type for ingress packets

-Original Message- From: Du, Fan Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 8:12 PM To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T Subject: [PATCH] ixgbevf: Set rx hash type for ingress packets Set hash type for ingress packets according to NIC advanced receive descriptors RSS type part. also use le16_to_cpu forcing type

Re: [E1000-devel] Issue with linuxptp and ixgbe 3.23.2

-Original Message- From: Scott Silverman [mailto:ssilver...@simplexinvestments.com] Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 9:10 AM Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Issue with linuxptp and ixgbe 3.23.2 It doesn't seem like 3.23.2.1 addressed this. Is it still pending in a future release? 3.23.2.1 was

Re: [E1000-devel] Fragmented UDP packets trigger rx_missed_errors on 82599EB

-Original Message- From: Fan Du [mailto:fengyuleidian0...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 6:52 PM Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Fragmented UDP packets trigger rx_missed_errors on 82599EB 于 2015年04月03日 01:52, Tantilov, Emil S 写道: # numactl --hardware available: 4 nodes (0-3

Re: [E1000-devel] Changing RSS on run time

-Original Message- From: Tal Abudi [mailto:talab...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 9:04 AM Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Changing RSS on run time Thanks for the reply ! Is using the ethtool command to change RSS causes any connectivity loss ? Yes the interface will be reset which

Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe: Can't read card registers during probe

-Original Message- From: Eric Hamilton [mailto:eric.hamil...@harmonicinc.com] Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 12:15 PM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] ixgbe: Can't read card registers during probe I am attempting to get an X520-SR2 card to work in an Intel 1RU

Re: [E1000-devel] Fragmented UDP packets trigger rx_missed_errors on 82599EB

-Original Message- From: Fan Du [mailto:fengyuleidian0...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 8:56 PM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Du, Fan; intel-wired-...@lists.osuosl.org Subject: [E1000-devel] Fragmented UDP packets trigger rx_missed_errors on 82599EB Hi While

Re: [E1000-devel] Changing RSS on run time

You can use ethtool -L option: ethtool -L ethX combined N Thanks, Emil -Original Message- From: Tal Abudi [mailto:talab...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 2:10 PM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] Changing RSS on run time Hi Is there a way to change

Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe: kernel BUG at include/linux/mm.h

-Original Message- From: Kirsher, Jeffrey T Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 1:43 AM Subject: Re: ixgbe: kernel BUG at include/linux/mm.h On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 15:09 +0800, Bob Liu wrote: Hi Jeff, Recently I met an issue that is likely related with ixgbe driver which I'm not familiar.

Re: [E1000-devel] Interface Suddenly Started Dropping Packet

-Original Message- From: Jeffrey Marshall [mailto:jmarshl...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 12:25 AM Subject: [E1000-devel] Interface Suddenly Started Dropping Packet Hi, I believe that I am encountering a similar issue with a that was reported to this mailing list

Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe: All RX packets go to rx_missed_errors

-Original Message- From: Matyas Koszik [mailto:kos...@atw.hu] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 2:59 AM Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe: All RX packets go to rx_missed_errors Hi, There're no logs at all related to the event (only the applications complained about the loss of

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] ixgbe: Add new ndo to allow VF multicast promiscuous mode

-Original Message- From: Hiroshi Shimamoto [mailto:h-shimam...@ct.jp.nec.com] Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 5:01 PM Subject: [E1000-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] ixgbe: Add new ndo to allow VF multicast promiscuous mode From: Hiroshi Shimamoto h-shimam...@ct.jp.nec.com Implements the new

Re: [E1000-devel] Enabling Loopback TX by default for all VFs

-Original Message- From: Yotam Rubin [mailto:yo...@weka.io] Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 4:48 AM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] Enabling Loopback TX by default for all VFs Hey, The 82599 and x540 support loopback tx traffic for VF's through the

Re: [E1000-devel] kernel 3.14.28 BUG_ON in skb_segment() called by ixgbe_poll() and napi

-Original Message- From: Chris Caputo [mailto:ccap...@alt.net] Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 12:12 PM Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] kernel 3.14.28 BUG_ON in skb_segment() called by ixgbe_poll() and napi Crash with 3.14.29 below with the same BUG in skb_segment() in net/core/skbuff.c.

Re: [E1000-devel] [linux-nics] Solved: Re: ixgbe/linux/sparc perf issues

-Original Message- From: linux-nics-boun...@isotope.jf.intel.com [mailto:linux-nics-boun...@isotope.jf.intel.com] On Behalf Of Sowmini Varadhan Sent: Friday, January 09, 2015 7:21 AM To: David Miller Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; sparcli...@vger.kernel.org; Linux NICS Subject:

Re: [E1000-devel] Question - Adding per CPU counters for Multi Queue

-Original Message- From: Tal Abudi [mailto:talab...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2015 4:40 AM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] Question - Adding per CPU counters for Multi Queue Hi I'm using ixgbe 3.9.15 and I want to add packets/bytes per cpu

Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe use only one queue for outgoing vlan when AtrSampleRate=0

-Original Message- From: Viktor Khomyuk [mailto:v.khom...@office.ngs.ru] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:39 PM To: Skidmore, Donald C; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe use only one queue for outgoing vlan when AtrSampleRate=0 No, I generate traffic

Re: [E1000-devel] 82599 VF Can't GET DHCP IP ADDRESS

-Original Message- From: Fan Liao [mailto:liaof...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 10:57 PM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] 82599 VF Can't GET DHCP IP ADDRESS We have two hosts with 82599 NIC, OS is Xenserver 6.2 SP1, VM 1 is on host 1, OS is

Re: [E1000-devel] issus with Kernel header files not in any of the expected locations

-Original Message- From: Freelance48 [mailto:freelance...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 2:55 PM To: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net Subject: [E1000-devel] issus with Kernel header files not in any of the expected locations Hi, Got this error root@server

Re: [E1000-devel] performance of two 82599 nics at a host

-Original Message- From: Bokhan Artem [mailto:a...@eml.ru] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 4:53 AM To: Fujinaka, Todd; E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] performance of two 82599 nics at a host Thank you for the answer, Todd. 15.10.2014 23:07, Fujinaka, Todd

Re: [E1000-devel] Packet drops with ixgbe 3.22.3 and Intel 82599EB‏

-Original Message- From: Stathis Gkotsis [mailto:stathisgot...@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 4:31 AM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] Packet drops with ixgbe 3.22.3 and Intel 82599EB‏ Hello, (Sorry for sending this message twice, my previous

Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe and pausing NICs

-Original Message- From: lheck...@users.sourceforge.net [mailto:lheck...@users.sourceforge.net] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 3:17 AM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe and pausing NICs It's probably not a flow control issue unless the switch

Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe and pausing NICs

-Original Message- From: lheck...@users.sourceforge.net [mailto:lheck...@users.sourceforge.net] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 3:44 AM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] ixgbe and pausing NICs Hello, I have been facing a problem with NICs going down

Re: [E1000-devel] Need Help about UDP multiple receive queue

to reproduce it on our end. Thanks, Emil -Original Message- From: Xu, Gang 1. (NSN - CN/Hangzhou) [mailto:gang.1...@nsn.com] Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 10:28 PM To: Tantilov, Emil S; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Ni, Zhenglin (NSN - CN/Hangzhou); Liu, Xin 9. (NSN - CN/Hangzhou); Yan

Re: [E1000-devel] Need Help about UDP multiple receive queue

-Original Message- From: Ouyang, Lane (NSN - CN/Hangzhou) [mailto:lane.ouy...@nsn.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 1:27 AM To: Tantilov, Emil S; Xu, Gang 1. (NSN - CN/Hangzhou); e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Ni, Zhenglin (NSN - CN/Hangzhou); Liu, Xin 9. (NSN - CN/Hangzhou); Yan

Re: [E1000-devel] slow network device access with 10g SFP+ card w/o modules

-Original Message- From: Jason Zhang [mailto:jason.zh...@riverbed.com] Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2014 2:21 PM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] slow network device access with 10g SFP+ card w/o modules We noticed very slow app performance when 10g SFP+ card has

Re: [E1000-devel] Need Help about UDP multiple receive queue

-Original Message- From: Ouyang, Lane (NSN - CN/Hangzhou) [mailto:lane.ouy...@nsn.com] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 2:04 AM To: Tantilov, Emil S; Xu, Gang 1. (NSN - CN/Hangzhou); e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Ni, Zhenglin (NSN - CN/Hangzhou); Liu, Xin 9. (NSN - CN/Hangzhou); Yan

Re: [E1000-devel] Get message about tx queue hang

-Original Message- From: nu li [mailto:ixgb...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 12:43 AM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] Get message about tx queue hang Hi list Now when I debugging the ixgbevf (2.14). Is the version of ixgbevf 2.14? I don't

Re: [E1000-devel] Need Help about UDP multiple receive queue

-Original Message- From: Xu, Gang 1. (NSN - CN/Hangzhou) [mailto:gang.1...@nsn.com] Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2014 10:52 PM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Ni, Zhenglin (NSN - CN/Hangzhou); Liu, Xin 9. (NSN - CN/Hangzhou); Ouyang, Lane (NSN - CN/Hangzhou); Yan, Liming (NSN -

Re: [E1000-devel] 82599EB big packet loss

-Original Message- From: Андрей Василишин [mailto:a.vasilis...@kpi.ua] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 8:35 AM To: Tantilov, Emil S; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82599EB big packet loss Emil, thaks for reply! with one of this modules (don't remember which

Re: [E1000-devel] 82599EB big packet loss

-Original Message- From: Андрей Василишин [mailto:a.vasilis...@kpi.ua] Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2014 10:32 AM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] 82599EB big packet loss Hello! I have NIC: # lspci -nn -v -s 07:00.1 07:00.1 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel

Re: [E1000-devel] The problem about intel 82599 NIC

-Original Message- From: opendaylight [mailto:opendayli...@126.com] Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 3:55 AM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] The problem about intel 82599 NIC Hi list I'm using intel 82599 SRIOV function on the xenserver 6.2 In the centos 6.4 VM,

Re: [E1000-devel] Spanning tree packets missing in ixgbe (82599)

-Original Message- From: Fred Klassen [mailto:fklas...@appneta.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 10:32 AM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] Spanning tree packets missing in ixgbe (82599) Hi, I'm trying to understand why I cannot receive classic STP or RSTP

Re: [E1000-devel] problem with balancing irq

-Original Message- From: Jaroslav Jirásek [mailto:jira...@sauron.cz] Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 2:47 AM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] problem with balancing irq Hi, I have last driver ixgbe-3.21.2, running on kernel 2.6.35.14 Module is loaded with this

Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe: how to balance PPPoE traffic via RSS to multiple queues

-Original Message- From: Jack Spinov [mailto:spi...@timegroup.ae] Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 12:15 AM To: Skidmore, Donald C Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe: how to balance PPPoE traffic via RSS to multiple queues Thanks for your reply, Donald.

Re: [E1000-devel] Issues with x520/ixgbe when enabling forwarding

-Original Message- From: d...@ramblingsteps.com [mailto:d...@ramblingsteps.com] On Behalf Of Daniel S. Cohen Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 11:41 AM To: Tantilov, Emil S Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Issues with x520/ixgbe when enabling forwarding Emil

Re: [E1000-devel] Hardware filters on intel 82599ES rev 1 card

-Original Message- From: Grzegorz Paszka [mailto:g.pas...@3s.pl] Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 2:20 AM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] Hardware filters on intel 82599ES rev 1 card Hello, Sorry if it isn't right place but I didn't find clear answer for my

Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbevf_xmit_frame NULL pointer dereference

-Original Message- From: Alex Lyakas [mailto:a...@zadarastorage.com] Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 1:02 AM To: Duyck, Alexander H; Skidmore, Donald C Cc: Rose, Gregory V; Tantilov, Emil S; E1000- de...@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: ixgbevf_xmit_frame NULL pointer dereference Hi

Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe causes slow ioctl / breaks net-snmp, ifconfig, ip

-Original Message- From: Scott Silverman [mailto:ssilver...@simplexinvestments.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 2:10 PM To: Tantilov, Emil S Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe causes slow ioctl / breaks net-snmp, ifconfig, ip I believe that the NET

Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe-3.17.3 :VLAN tagged packets does not work when using PF-PACKET socket ,

I've been busy last couple of weeks, but have not forgotten about this. I will update once I have a setup ready. Sorry for the delay, Emil -Original Message- From: Vijay Agrawal [mailto:vagra...@ixiacom.com] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 2:20 AM To: Tantilov, Emil S; Fujinaka, Todd

Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe-3.17.3 :VLAN tagged packets does not work when using PF-PACKET socket ,

if I see something. Thanks, Emil -Original Message- From: Vijay Agrawal [mailto:vagra...@ixiacom.com] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 4:06 AM To: Tantilov, Emil S; Fujinaka, Todd; e1000- de...@lists.sf.net Subject: RE: [E1000-devel] ixgbe-3.17.3 :VLAN tagged packets does not work when

Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe-3.17.3 :VLAN tagged packets does not work when using PF-PACKET socket ,

-Original Message- From: Vijay Agrawal [mailto:vagra...@ixiacom.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 7:37 AM To: Tantilov, Emil S; Fujinaka, Todd; e1000- de...@lists.sf.net Subject: RE: [E1000-devel] ixgbe-3.17.3 :VLAN tagged packets does not work when using PF-PACKET socket , Hi , We

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 with cavium octeon guest in QEMU

-Original Message- From: Maryyam Muhammad Din [mailto:maryya...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 10:15 PM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] e1000 with cavium octeon guest in QEMU I am using Cavium Octeon (CN57XX) guest with QEMU. I want to use qemu

Re: [E1000-devel] Jumbo frame MTU setting for Virtual function - RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument

-Original Message- From: Raj Ravi [mailto:mekavi...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 8:12 PM To: Tantilov, Emil S Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Jumbo frame MTU setting for Virtual function - RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument Thanks. Will you

Re: [E1000-devel] Jumbo frame MTU setting for Virtual function - RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument

This was an issue in the older versions of ixgbevf. Newer versions should not show this problem. Thanks, Emil -Original Message- From: Raj Ravi [mailto:mekavi...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 5:21 AM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] Jumbo frame

Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe-3.17.3 :VLAN tagged packets does not work when using PF-PACKET socket ,

-Original Message- From: Vijay Agrawal [mailto:vagra...@ixiacom.com] Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 10:17 PM To: Fujinaka, Todd; e1000-de...@lists.sf.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe-3.17.3 :VLAN tagged packets does not work when using PF-PACKET socket , Hi Todd, We are really

Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe-3.17.3 :VLAN tagged packets does not work when using PF-PACKET socket

The ixgbe driver strips vlan tags and this is by design as Todd mentioned this due to 8021P support. There are different cases where the result may differ based on the kernel version. There is a long discussion regarding this issue here: sourceforge.net/p/e1000/bugs/355/ You can also modify

Re: [E1000-devel] Possible bug in ixgbe-3.19.1 ixgbe_enumerate_functions()

part of a multiport NIC. Thanks, Emil -Original Message- From: Chaitanya Lala [mailto:chaitanya.l...@riverbed.com] Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 5:19 PM To: Tantilov, Emil S; Chaitanya Lala; e1000- de...@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Possible bug in ixgbe-3.19.1

Re: [E1000-devel] Possible bug in ixgbe-3.19.1 ixgbe_enumerate_functions()

Can you provide the output of lspci -vvv from the network device in the VM? Thanks, Emil -Original Message- From: Chaitanya Lala [mailto:chaitanya.l...@riverbed.com] Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 4:03 PM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Chaitanya Lala Subject: [E1000-devel]

Re: [E1000-devel] Fwd: libvirt-qemu/kvm passthru w/Intel 82598EB

-Original Message- From: laurence.schuler [mailto:laurence.schu...@nasa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 10:22 AM To: Tantilov, Emil S Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Fwd: libvirt-qemu/kvm passthru w/Intel 82598EB Hi Emil, We are only using

Re: [E1000-devel] Fwd: libvirt-qemu/kvm passthru w/Intel 82598EB

-Original Message- From: laurence.schuler [mailto:laurence.schu...@nasa.gov] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 11:35 AM To: Tantilov, Emil S Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Fwd: libvirt-qemu/kvm passthru w/Intel 82598EB On 09/05/2013 01:39 PM, Tantilov

Re: [E1000-devel] Intel igb module command line configuration in kernel sources

-Original Message- From: Andrew Davidoff [mailto:david...@qedmf.net] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 8:32 PM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] Intel igb module command line configuration in kernel sources Hi, I apologize that this is a user-type question

Re: [E1000-devel] Huge Performance Regression with adding of IXGBE_FLAG_IN_NETPOLL flag

Hi Shyam, We are working on cleaning up the Rx code path which will also remove the IXGBE_FLAG_IN_NETPOLL. Thanks, Emil -Original Message- From: Shyam Kaushik [mailto:sh...@zadarastorage.com] Sent: Monday, September 02, 2013 4:32 AM To: Rose, Gregory V Cc:

  1   2   3   >