Re: [E1000-devel] i40e bonding promisc issue

2016-04-28 Thread Laszlo Fekete
Hi I also tried this patch but didn't worked. Created ticket as Emil suggested, https://sourceforge.net/p/e1000/bugs/524/ Thank you, blackluck On 2016. April 28. 13:20:23 zhuyj wrote: > Hi, all > > About the patch "ixgbe: do not call check_link for ethtool in > ixgbe_get_settings()", I tried

Re: [E1000-devel] i40e bonding promisc issue

2016-04-27 Thread zhuyj
Hi, all About the patch "ixgbe: do not call check_link for ethtool in ixgbe_get_settings()", I tried to make a similar patch in i40e nic driver. The patch is as below. This patch is based on the latest linux kernel. I am not sure that this patch can fix this problem. Please make tests and let

Re: [E1000-devel] i40e bonding promisc issue

2016-04-27 Thread zhuyj
Emil S >> <emil.s.tanti...@intel.com>; jay.vosbu...@canonical.com >> Jay Vosburgh >> <jay.vosbu...@canonical.com> >> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] i40e bonding promisc issue >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> okay, I think understand your po

Re: [E1000-devel] i40e bonding promisc issue

2016-04-27 Thread zhuyj
Emil S >> <emil.s.tanti...@intel.com>; jay.vosbu...@canonical.com >> Jay Vosburgh >> <jay.vosbu...@canonical.com> >> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] i40e bonding promisc issue >> >> Hi, >> >> The patches are too many. Based on the l

Re: [E1000-devel] i40e bonding promisc issue

2016-04-27 Thread zhuyj
Hi, Please let me know "i40e: synchronize link_up and link_speed of a slave interface" work or not. I am making a new patch for you. Best Regards! Zhu Yanjun On 04/27/2016 04:56 PM, zhuyj wrote: > Hi, > > The patches are too many. Based on the latest linux kernel, I modified > the patch in

Re: [E1000-devel] i40e bonding promisc issue

2016-04-27 Thread Tantilov, Emil S
om >> Jay Vosburgh ><jay.vosbu...@canonical.com> >Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] i40e bonding promisc issue > >Hi, > >The patches are too many. Based on the latest linux kernel, I modified >the patch in the link:http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/561848/ > >If th

Re: [E1000-devel] i40e bonding promisc issue

2016-04-27 Thread Tantilov, Emil S
>-Original Message- >From: Laszlo Fekete [mailto:blackl...@ktk.bme.hu] >Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 1:13 AM >To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] i40e bonding promisc issue > >Okay, it seems probably too long the message so let's try w

Re: [E1000-devel] i40e bonding promisc issue

2016-04-27 Thread Tantilov, Emil S
om >> Jay Vosburgh ><jay.vosbu...@canonical.com> >Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] i40e bonding promisc issue > >Hi, > > > >okay, I think understand your point, what could be the problem. > >As I see in 4.5 kernel the bonding patch already there, so I need on

Re: [E1000-devel] i40e bonding promisc issue

2016-04-27 Thread Laszlo Fekete
Hi, okay, I think understand your point, what could be the problem. As I see in 4.5 kernel the bonding patch already there, so I need only patch i40e driver. I wanna try it with latest i40e driver (1.5.18), but there are too much difference from that ixgbe patch so can't really patch with that

Re: [E1000-devel] i40e bonding promisc issue

2016-04-27 Thread zhuyj
Hi, The patches are too many. Based on the latest linux kernel, I modified the patch in the link:http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/561848/ If the root cause is correct, the following patch should fix this problem. This patch is based on the analysis. And it is only for test. Please let me know

Re: [E1000-devel] i40e bonding promisc issue

2016-04-27 Thread Laszlo Fekete
Okay, it seems probably too long the message so let's try with pastebin. I booted with debian backports 4.5 kernel with its 1.4.8 i40e driver 4.5.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.5.1-1~bpo8+1 (2016-04-20) x86_64 GNU/Linux # ethtool -i enp4s0f0 driver: i40e version: 1.4.8-k firmware-version: 4.53

Re: [E1000-devel] i40e bonding promisc issue

2016-04-27 Thread zhuyj
On 04/27/2016 03:47 PM, Laszlo Fekete wrote: > > [ 211.955239] i40e :04:00.0 enp4s0f0: speed changed to 0 for port > enp4s0f0 > > [ 211.956912] bond0: link status up again after 0 ms for interface > enp4s0f0 > Hi, I can not reproduce your problem because I have no i40e device. But from the

Re: [E1000-devel] i40e bonding promisc issue

2016-04-27 Thread Laszlo Fekete
Hi! It seems somewhere lost the message end, so let's try continue down. On 2016. April 27. 09:47:25 Laszlo Fekete wrote: > Hello! > > So I booted with debian backports 4.5 kernel with its 1.4.8 i40e driver > 4.5.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.5.1-1~bpo8+1 (2016-04-20) > x86_64 GNU/Linux > #

Re: [E1000-devel] i40e bonding promisc issue

2016-04-27 Thread Laszlo Fekete
Hello! So I booted with debian backports 4.5 kernel with its 1.4.8 i40e driver 4.5.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.5.1-1~bpo8+1 (2016-04-20) x86_64 GNU/Linux # ethtool -i enp4s0f0 driver: i40e version: 1.4.8-k firmware-version: 4.53 0x80001e5c 17.0.12 bus-info: :04:00.0 supports-statistics:

Re: [E1000-devel] i40e bonding promisc issue

2016-04-26 Thread zhuyj
Hi, Maybe I confronted the similar problem. But I confirm it firstly. When this problem occurs, please run "ethtool -r" command. Can this command relieve this problem? Please let me know. Run "dmesg" command when this problem occurs. And let me know the result. Then I can confirm this

[E1000-devel] i40e bonding promisc issue

2016-04-26 Thread Laszlo Fekete
Hello! I have an issue with i40e driver, maybe somebody from here already saw it. I have debian 8 with 2 intel x710 4 port 10G sfp+ card, which has by default 3.16 kernel and i40e module with 0.4 version: 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt25-2 (2016-04-08) x86_64 GNU/Linux # ethtool -i