The problem is that it's (almost) always the "religionists" trying to
instigate squabbles with scientists. I know of no scientists who have
walked into a church and demand that evolution be included as
an "alterantive" to their preachings. It's always the "religionists"
wanting religion be tr
ay 05, 2007 5:22 PM
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Subject: Re: FW: Be more willing to get a bloody nose in defense of reality!
Okay, this is a good start. What I would suggest is that the ESA field a
letter responding to IJCR by stating in, layman's terms, the critical
difference between science
munication.
>
> Adam Herbert
>
> "recycling reward consumption" - William McDonough
>
>
>
> ------ Forwarded message --
> From: Richard Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: May 4, 2007 9:13 PM
> Subject: FW: Be more willing to get a blood
Richard Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: May 4, 2007 9:13 PM
Subject: FW: Be more willing to get a bloody nose in defense of reality!
To: adam herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I see where you're trying to make trouble down lower?
--
*From:* Mammalian Biolo
