There is an open request for such a project; your contribution would be
appreciated!
https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/Tasks#Port_OpenSSH_as_a_shell_application
On 12/30/18 11:11 PM, prabin ca wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I would like to know is there any way to get UEFI shell remote
On 05/15/2018 03:36 PM, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
> [...] Is there a simple tool that allows to extract these Intel blobs from
> Build/CorebootPayloadPkgX64/RELEASE_GCC5/FV/UEFIPAYLOAD.fd ?
I expect most Tianocore tools focus on creating blobs, not reversing
them. If EDK2 has tools like this, I'd also
| [...] Is it possible to tune Logo's behavior in OVMF? [...]
FYI, the HackBGRT tool exists, and may be helpful [on some bare-metal
systems, unclear about OVMF-based usefulness]. I've never used it.
https://github.com/Metabolix/HackBGRT
https://firmwaresecurity.com/2018/03/22/hackbgrt-how-to-chan
On 04/16/2018 08:26 AM, Richardson, Brian wrote:
>
https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/How-to-debug-OVMF-with-QEMU-using-GDB
Also useful for this topic:
https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/Testing-SMM-with-QEMU,-KVM-and-libvirt
HTH,
Lee
__
Hi,
I'm trying a tool to write a UEFI app that accesses the HSTI image, via
it's Boot Service Protocol.
Before I start, does anyone know of any:
1) existing open source tool that does this?
2) existing Tianocore source that uses the HSTI boot services protocol?
3) OS-present API/ioctl/interfac
On 11/02/2017 09:41 AM, Jayaprakash, N wrote:
> Would you consider adding thread support in this port of Python for
EDK2 shell?
FYI, this library adds thread support to UEFI:
https://github.com/Openwide-Ingenierie/GreenThreads-UEFI
Note that the library is GPLv2, ...but the author (a 1-person pr
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Jeff Westfahl wrote:
> I'm looking for tools that run in the UEFI shell and do typical hash
functions on files. [...]
CPython for UEFI implements the hashlib module from the Python std
library, so you could also search for Python solutions, not just C.
HTH,
Lee F
You might want to look at Firmware Test Suite, it includes a Linux
kernel driver to help with it's interactions with UEFI. Note that this
is a Linux-centric test suite, solution won't work for other OSes.
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git/hwe/fwts.git
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+b
On 08/23/2017 02:04 AM, Karunakar P wrote:
> Do we have any specific Document for Iscsi?
> Any document that describes the standard iscsi behavior.
I'm not aware of any 'design specification', that may be hoping for too
much.
http://uefi.org/uefi points to 4 [i]SCSI-related URLs:
[RFC 3720] Inte
On 06/05/2017 01:23 AM, GN Keshava wrote:
> I was able to build EDK2 using VS2008. Did anyone used VS2015 and built
> the EDK2? If yes, I want to know how I can do it.
You might check out how the VisualUEFI project builds EDK2.
According to it's readme, it works with VS2015.
https://github.com/ion
On 06/02/2017 12:23 AM, Shubham Mittal wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there any utility/tool by which i can format sd card(connected to
board) using UEFI shell.
>
> As of now, i have to detach it and format it and attach it again..
I'm not sure this answers your question or not, but Intel has some UEFI
d
As I understand things, Intel is maintaining CPython 2.7x for UEFI, and they
also helped with Lua port.
I'm wondering if Lua EFI port is actively maintained?
Asking for someone else, see below.
In addition to developer audience, it would seem that there some need for
pre-compiled binaries of
On 02/21/2017 02:18 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 02/21/17 10:22, Shi, Steven wrote:
>> Hi Laszlo,
>> I wonder if you could offer a Ubuntu version wiki for the
>> Testing-SMM-with-QEMU,-KVM-and-libvirt?
>
> Sorry, I can't do that.[...]
FYI, Alex Floyd recently wrote a shell script to codify Laszlo'
> There are some web pages described Hypervisor with UEFI Firmware. Are
there
> some Hypervisor sample implementations in current EDKII source code base?
Alex's SimpleVisor is a UEFI hypervisor.
https://firmwaresecurity.com/2016/08/31/alex-working-on-uefisor-simplevisor-for-uefi/
https://firmware
I had missed the shell's ability to do this with commands, and thought
they always had to be external *.efi files. Thanks for the
clarification. That is great news.
Lee
On 03/06/2017 08:33 AM, Carsey, Jaben wrote:
> Few thoughts - with the UEFI Shell Specification complaint shell
binary from Shel
I've been working on building thumbdrives that boot into the UEFI Shell,
and have a few end-user questions, please.
I've always been unclear which version of EFI/UEFI Apple includes on
their hardware. Are the older EdkShellBinPkg shells suitable for modern
Apple boxes, or will the modern UEFI Shel
> I am evaluating a number of options and hope to put together
> a complete proposal as an RFC for consideration in the next
> few weeks.
For your evaluation, please also check out the U-Boot and coreboot
projects, they both have some built-in tests.
Thanks,
Lee Fisher
_
On 11/06/2016 01:57 AM, Matt Lazarowitz wrote:
> I would like to find out if anyone has experience with an off the shelf
> unit test framework in the EDK2.[...]
If you haven't looked at it, two months ago Microsoft open-sourced some
EDK2-centric unit tests.
https://firmwaresecurity.com/2016/09/23
On 10/12/2016 10:34 AM, GN Keshava wrote:
> Thanks Laszlo, I'll check it out.
>
> I think I need to combine the LS implementation and RM implementation,
> isn't it? So there is no "format this volume" function or command exists,
> right?
The commands do exist. But they're not in Tianocore, and h
On 10/12/2016 07:31 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 10/12/16 12:48, GN Keshava wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I need to format fs1: (or delete all files and folders in root directory)
>> from my UEFI application.
>>
>> I'm able to use file system APIs such as Open, Write or Delete too. But
>> Delete API nee
> Have you ever used any free automation test tool? Any recommendation?
What EFI-related thing are you trying to test?
___
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
On 03/18/2016 07:08 AM, Tian, Feng wrote:
> http://www.intel.com/technology/efi/agree_diskutil.htm
Hi,
Why the EULA for these Intel tools? Why aren't they BSD-licensed and
part of the UEFI Forum's EDK-II? Some IP of Microsoft FAT? Hasn't the
Microsoft FAT on-disk format IP since been published ye
Inside the first zip there is a ReadMeFirst.txt file which contains the
password for the second zip.
On 03/18/2016 03:52 PM, Rod Smith wrote:
> On 03/18/2016 10:08 AM, Tian, Feng wrote:
>> http://www.intel.com/technology/efi/agree_diskutil.htm
> The .zip file that I eventually got from this is pas
On 12/24/2015 05:47 PM, LiHongcheng wrote:
> I was wondering whether there are anyone who`ve been researched about
hacking team's
> UEFI rootkit. Can you share some related information with me?
http://firmwaresecurity.com/2015/07/15/intel-analysis-of-hacking-team-uefi-malware/
PS: Unrelated to th
OEMs, please ask your QA teams to update to this new release! :-)
Forwarded Message
Subject: CHIPSEC 1.2.2 released!
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2015 08:27:12 -0800
From: Blibbet
To: chip...@lists.01.org
Since the Intel CHIPSEC team only uses Twitter to announce things
Has anyone considered OVMF support for Unicorn? If you know the list of
what is needed to accomplish it, please speak up, it'd be nice to have
that information where it might be helpful to potential contributors.
Thanks!
http://www.unicorn-engine.org/docs/beyond_qemu.html
Forwarded Messa
open source firmware was needed
for golden images, below.
Thanks.
On 09/09/2015 11:14 AM, Blibbet wrote:
> I have some questions about UEFI and the below excerpts from NIST
> SP-147, from sections 3.1.1 and 3.2.
>
> Is this "gold master image" possible with UEFI? Are any ent
> As you say, the closed source nature of most BIOSes makes complying
with these
> requirements nearly impossible for most organizations. The only
exceptions I
> can think of are big companies with connections to the IBVs (e.g. Intel,
> Microsoft) or the government/military. Something tells me none
> Sure, mixture of licenses makes life more difficult. Not an excuse for
> ignoring non-BSD innovations and embracing Linux OSV/OEM community with
> their preferred license. GPL'ed LibreOffice bugfixes can't go upstream
> to BSD-like, ASF2 license of Apache OpenOffice, but that's life.
I spent th
> I don’t understand the issue BSD licensed code?
> It should be compatible with the GPL?
> The GPL code could merge bug fixes from the BSD
> source base as needed. It is just the BDS source
> base that can not take back GPL code.
I'm not sure I understand, I presume you understand all BSD/GPL
lic
Short term an OVMF-centric solution is good.
But long term, I think Linux needs a Linux-friendly IBV to build native
UEFI -- as well as OVMF-flavored UEFI -- with non-BSD licensed community
code. If you restrict this to just OVMF, any GPL innovations will only
happen at virtual level. Right now, b
On 09/09/2015 11:49 AM, Bill Paul wrote:
[...]
> Oh sure, no pressure.
>
> As you say, the closed source nature of most BIOSes makes complying
with these
> requirements nearly impossible for most organizations. The only
exceptions I
> can think of are big companies with connections to the IBVs (e.g
I have some questions about UEFI and the below excerpts from NIST
SP-147, from sections 3.1.1 and 3.2.
Is this "gold master image" possible with UEFI? Are any enterprises
practicing this? What tools are they using? I can't any information on
any enterprise who does this today.
I currently doubt i
NT-centric post follows, slightly off-topic:
On 09/03/2015 08:51 AM, Brian J. Johnson wrote:
> On 09/03/2015 05:08 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
...
> I see you CC'd some folks at Microsoft. Hopefully they will be able
to give you more specific advice.
For low-level NT issues, I'd also recommend the n
Belatedly, thanks for the advise, Zachary and Bruce!!
http://firmwaresecurity.com/2015/08/15/low-cost-uefi-debugging-options-for-intel/
___
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
On 08/14/2015 02:03 AM, Gary Ching-Pang Lin wrote:
> Although the current HttpBoot implementation is incomplete, it would be
> easier to develop and test the software stack with a virtual machine.
THANKS for adding to OVMF!
Besides "1219 UEFI.Next Feature - UEFI TLS API", what else is missing?
I just did an 'interview' with LegbaCore today:
http://firmwaresecurity.com/2015/08/12/interview-with-legbacore-and-their-oprom-checker-ships/
In addition to previous UEFI Forum plugfest advice from Phoenix (RUN
CHIPSEC!!), also note below comment from LegbaCore.
They were professional enough to
Q: Is TianoCore going to get any additional DMF Redfish support beyond
the new UEFI 2.5 REST API?
Q: what about Redfish UPNP SSDP dependence?
The Redfish Mockup says:
"Note – discovery of service endpoints will be done using UPNP’s SSDP
but that’s not in the mockup."
This implies that non-
> On 07/31/2015 02:32 PM, Simpson, Gary wrote:
>>> Is anyone from AMD on this list? If you know the right person, could
you please forward?
>> [Gary Simpson] Hi, Lee. My name is Gary Simpson (Firmware Architect
at AMD). Your post was forwarded to me.
>> (Thanks to both people who did so.) If de
Some Windows/EDK2 blog posts that may help:
http://uefi.blogspot.com/2013/06/how-to-set-up-edk2s-windows-hosted-uefi.html
http://pete.akeo.ie/2015/01/easily-create-uefi-applications-using.html
http://spyker729.blogspot.com/2012/10/how-to-build-edk-edkii-environment-in.html
If you look at the Intel
[...]
>>> Sorry I was thinking more about routine maintenance (like the string n
>>> cleanup recently), or refactoring of the code disabling the exploit
>>> mechanism with out knowledge that the exploit exists. I guess an older
>>> branch can get patched, but the commit history in master is not go
I agree that OEMs/IBVs/TianoCore Security Advisories can improve their
security information.
I *DEFINATELY* agree that bugs should include CVEs in them. I also think
UEFI Forum needs to define OVAL definitions for UEFI. Right now,
firmware is not defined in SCAP, and it's just luck if the right te
FYI, in case any OEM's missed today's US-CERT UEFI vulnerability notice:
http://firmwaresecurity.com/2015/07/30/us-cert-bios-vulnerability-note-vu577140/
Remember that any TianoCore-based bugs may be in your platorm:
https://twitter.com/XenoKovah/status/623483244890189824
Can anyone clarify if
The UEFI 2.5 spec's revision mentions:
"1222 UEFI.Next feature - BMC/Service Processor Device Path"
In the UEFI 2.5 spec, all I've found are 3 references on BMC: Section
9.3.2.6 (BMC Device Path) structure definition. Section 2.6.2
(Platform-Specific Elements) says: "If a platform supports RESTfu
On 07/27/2015 01:13 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> [...]
> Actually, aren't the only things in OPENSSL_FLAGS now MSFT-specific
anyway?
> [...]
It is GREAT to see this effort to get UEFI's libOpenSSL patches
upstream, where they belong. Thank you!
Perhaps the UEFI Forum could also consider a LibreS
Hi,
I just learned about Intel's ITP-XDP product:
https://designintools.intel.com/product_p/itpxdp3brext.htm
It looks interesting; previously, all I knew of was Arium's ITP and AMI's
AMIdebug products.
For a UEFI ISV or security researcher, not for OEM/ODM-centric usage...
Would this work wit
Now that UEFI 2.5 spec shows DNS support:
2.5 1215 UEFI.Next feature - DNS version 4 February, 2015
2.5 1216 UEFI.next feature - DNS version 6 February, 2015
2.5 1341 DNS4 - friendly amendment to be reviewed by USWG April, 2015
2.5 1342 DNS6 - friendly amendment for review by USWG April, 2015
Are
http://firmwaresecurity.com/2015/07/22/chipsec-mailing-list-created/
Thanks,
Lee
RSS: http://firmwaresecurity.com/feed
___
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
Hi,
Is anyone from AMD on this list? If you know the right person, could you
please forward?
Can anyone explain AMD's strategy w/r/t UEFI and BIOS, UEFI and coreboot?
For x64/EMT64 systems:
What models use UEFI, what models use BIOS, what models use coreboot?
I'm unclear if they're still using
I'm getting failures to connect to any of the Tianocore subversion projects.
Same issue for the last 2 days. Haven't seen this problem before. I've
tried 2 different systems -- albeit with the same script -- same errors.
Is Svn working for others, or is this problem somehow isolated to me?
Has T
50 matches
Mail list logo
