On Friday, 4 January 2019 03:09:02 MST Knop, Ryszard wrote:
> I think any solution like that should be publicly available for an
> unlimited number of users. As it stands now, mailing lists and IRC are
> open to all - if software like Microsoft Teams is to be used, it's
> pretty likely most communi
; and I'll add you as a guest on our Project Mu Teams channel for
> evaluation purposes.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeremiah
>
> -Original Message-
> From: edk2-devel On Behalf Of
> stephano
> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 8:59 AM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>
f stephano
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 8:59 AM
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Subject: [edk2] [edk2-announce][RFC] Collaboration Software
We are looking to augment our current communication methods (mailing list /
IRC) with a modern solution for group collaboration. The goal is to allow folks
ill
>>>> only log so much
>>>> information before things start falling off into the
>>>> ether.
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone in the community currently use Slack and know
>>>> of an easy way
>>>> of archiving conversations publ
On Friday, 16 November 2018 19:42:51 MST Sean Brogan via edk2-devel wrote:
> Mike,
>
> I like the github teams option for discussion as it is just there, free, and
> easy. It integrates nicely with all other parts of github. Notifications
> are supported for those that want email. Is there any
t; Sean
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: edk2-devel On Behalf Of Kinney,
> Michael D
> > Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 11:55 AM
> > To: stephano ; Zimmer, Vincent <
> vincent.zim...@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Kinney,
n Behalf Of Kinney, Michael
D
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 11:55 AM
To: stephano ; Zimmer, Vincent
; edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: Re: [edk2] [edk2-announce][RFC] Collaboration Software
Hi Stephano,
GitHub supports discussions for teams.
If we added a new team to the Git
On November 16, 2018 at 7:42:51 PM, Sean Brogan via edk2-devel
(edk2-devel@lists.01.org(mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org)) wrote:
> I really can't get behind the Phabricator tool suite as it just has too many
> downsides (self-hosted or pay, lack of integrations, lack of support and
> limited se
Of Kinney, Michael
D
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 11:55 AM
To: stephano ; Zimmer, Vincent
; edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: Re: [edk2] [edk2-announce][RFC] Collaboration Software
Hi Stephano,
GitHub supports discussions for teams.
If we added a new team to the GitHub
On 11/16/2018 4:37 PM, Rebecca Cran wrote:
On Friday, 16 November 2018 17:34:09 MST stephano wrote:
Rebecca Cran also brought up that Phabricator allows discussions to be
interacted with via email. A quick search for Phabricator and
"Configuring Inbound Email" it seems that one can both receive
On 11/16/2018 2:14 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote> For people on the
move, having bad internet (3rd world countries), email
system is very powerful, you can download once and work offline,
reading/answering. You can also download the list archive and refers to
it offline. You also have access
On Friday, 16 November 2018 17:34:09 MST stephano wrote:
> Rebecca Cran also brought up that Phabricator allows discussions to be
> interacted with via email. A quick search for Phabricator and
> "Configuring Inbound Email" it seems that one can both receive and send
> discussion messages if confi
On 11/16/2018 1:51 PM, Rebecca Cran wrote> Conversations can followed
via email, so that's one way of 'exporting' them.
But otherwise, I suspect you'd need to either query the database directly or
use "./bin/storage dump":
Perfect. As long as we have a way to store history of conversations I
t
age-
From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org]
On Behalf Of stephano
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 11:14 AM
To: Zimmer, Vincent ; edk2-
de...@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [edk2] [edk2-announce][RFC] Collaboration
Software
The only reason I didn't include Slack is that it wil
On Friday, 16 November 2018 14:42:44 MST stephano wrote:
> This is a great suggestion, thanks! Two questions:
> 1. Does it allow you to export your conversations in some way?
Conversations can followed via email, so that's one way of 'exporting' them.
But otherwise, I suspect you'd need to eith
On 11/16/2018 12:52 PM, Rebecca Cran wrote:
I'm in several Slack teams: it seems to be the go-to solution for persistent
chat nowadays. None of those pay (i.e. they're on the free tier), so are
subject to its 10,000 message history limit.
I have found the same situation in other open source com
ssage-
From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org]
On Behalf Of stephano
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 11:14 AM
To: Zimmer, Vincent ; edk2-
de...@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [edk2] [edk2-announce][RFC] Collaboration
Software
The only reason I didn't include Slack is that it will
o
On Friday, 16 November 2018 12:13:37 MST stephano wrote:
> The only reason I didn't include Slack is that it will only log so much
> information before things start falling off into the ether.
>
> Does anyone in the community currently use Slack and know of an easy way
> of archiving conversations
-discussions/
Best regards,
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org]
> On Behalf Of stephano
> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 11:14 AM
> To: Zimmer, Vincent ; edk2-
> de...@lists.01.org
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [edk2-announc
wrote:
https://slack.com/
-Original Message-
From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Kevin D
Davis
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 9:35 AM
To: stephano ; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [edk2] [edk2-announce][RFC] Collaboration Sof
https://slack.com/
-Original Message-
From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Kevin D
Davis
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 9:35 AM
To: stephano ; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [edk2] [edk2-announce][RFC] Collaboration Software
If we get to vote, I’d vote against Google Groups. Their interface is
very geared toward their internal work flow and seems to change on a whim.
Thanks,Kevin
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 11:08 AM -0600, "stephano"
wrote:
We are looking to augment o
We are looking to augment our current communication methods (mailing
list / IRC) with a modern solution for group collaboration. The goal is
to allow folks to communicate effectively without interrupting the
current patch review system, as well as enabling any future systems with
more robust op
23 matches
Mail list logo
