On 01/25/19 21:28, Brian J. Johnson wrote:
> On 1/24/19 5:30 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 01/24/19 10:31, David Woodhouse wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2019-01-24 at 01:48 +, Ni, Ray wrote:
David,
I think we got an agreement here to move CSM components in OvmfPkg.
I prefer we firstly clone
On 1/24/19 5:30 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 01/24/19 10:31, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Thu, 2019-01-24 at 01:48 +, Ni, Ray wrote:
David,
I think we got an agreement here to move CSM components in OvmfPkg.
I prefer we firstly clone the required CSM components in OvmfPkg right no.
Finally I can
On 01/24/19 10:31, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-01-24 at 01:48 +, Ni, Ray wrote:
>> David,
>> I think we got an agreement here to move CSM components in OvmfPkg.
>> I prefer we firstly clone the required CSM components in OvmfPkg right no.
>> Finally I can remove the IntelFrameworkModu
On Thu, 2019-01-24 at 01:48 +, Ni, Ray wrote:
> David,
> I think we got an agreement here to move CSM components in OvmfPkg.
> I prefer we firstly clone the required CSM components in OvmfPkg right no.
> Finally I can remove the IntelFrameworkModulePkg/IntelFrameworkPkg in one
> patch.
> (I sa
David,
I think we got an agreement here to move CSM components in OvmfPkg.
I prefer we firstly clone the required CSM components in OvmfPkg right no.
Finally I can remove the IntelFrameworkModulePkg/IntelFrameworkPkg in one patch.
(I say "finally" because OVMF CSM dependency is not the only case th
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 10:55, Laszlo Er
> > That's going to be a hard thing to keep from happening over time, as
> > this is valid C :(sek wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> On 01/23/19 04:43, Ni, Ray wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: David Woodhouse
> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 12
On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 10:46 +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> I'm fine if we move the generic CSM components into OvmfPkg, however I'm
> going to ask David to assume reviewer responsibilities for them.
>
> Given the current format of "Maintainers.txt", we couldn't spell out the
> exact pathnames of the
Hi All,
On 01/23/19 04:43, Ni, Ray wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David Woodhouse
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 12:23 AM
>> To: Ni, Ray ; Gerd Hoffmann ;
>> Laszlo Ersek ; Richardson, Brian
>>
>> Cc: Justen, Jordan L ; edk2-devel@lists.01.org;
>> Kevin O'Connor ; Anthony Pe
On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 07:12 +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > A one-size-fits-all BIOS using OVMF+CSM is very much
> > preferable.
>
> Building a one-size-fits-all BIOS is pretty much impossible due to CSM
> being incompatible with secure boot.
Booting with CSM is incompatible with Secure Boot, of
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 04:23:06PM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-01-22 at 16:13 +, Ni, Ray wrote:
> > David,
> > I'd like to re-start the discussion.
> > Could you please kindly explain the background/reason of adding CSM
> > support in OVMF?
> > Maybe knowing the reason can help
x27;Connor
Subject: Re: [edk2] Drop CSM support in OvmfPkg?
On Jan 22, 2019, at 7:43 PM, Ni, Ray
mailto:ray...@intel.com>> wrote:
-Original Message-
From: David Woodhouse mailto:dw...@infradead.org>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 12:23 AM
To: Ni, Ray mailto:ray...@inte
> On Jan 22, 2019, at 7:43 PM, Ni, Ray wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David Woodhouse mailto:dw...@infradead.org>>
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 12:23 AM
>> To: Ni, Ray mailto:ray...@intel.com>>; Gerd Hoffmann
>> mailto:kra...@redhat.com>>;
>> Laszlo Ersek mailto:ler..
> -Original Message-
> From: David Woodhouse
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 12:23 AM
> To: Ni, Ray ; Gerd Hoffmann ;
> Laszlo Ersek ; Richardson, Brian
>
> Cc: Justen, Jordan L ; edk2-devel@lists.01.org;
> Kevin O'Connor ; Anthony Perard
>
> Subject: Re: Drop CSM support in OvmfPkg?
On Tue, 2019-01-22 at 16:13 +, Ni, Ray wrote:
> David,
> I'd like to re-start the discussion.
> Could you please kindly explain the background/reason of adding CSM
> support in OVMF?
> Maybe knowing the reason can help to make further decisions of
> whether to
> A. keep it outside OvmfPkg
> B.
, Brian
>
> Cc: Justen, Jordan L ; edk2-devel@lists.01.org;
> Kevin O'Connor ; Anthony Perard
>
> Subject: Re: [edk2] Drop CSM support in OvmfPkg?
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David Woodhouse [mailto:dw...@infradead.org]
> > Sent: Th
> -Original Message-
> From: David Woodhouse [mailto:dw...@infradead.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 9:37 PM
> To: Gerd Hoffmann ; Laszlo Ersek
> Cc: Ni, Ruiyu ; Justen, Jordan L
> ; Ard Biesheuvel ;
> Anthony Perard ; Julien Grall
> ; edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Kevin O'Connor
>
On Thu, 2018-12-20 at 07:44 +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 10:54:25AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> > (Adding Kevin, Gerd, David)
> >
> > On 12/17/18 03:23, Ni, Ruiyu wrote:
> > > Hi OvmfPkg maintainers and reviewers,
> > > I am working on removing IntelFrameworkModulePkg and
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 10:54:25AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> (Adding Kevin, Gerd, David)
>
> On 12/17/18 03:23, Ni, Ruiyu wrote:
> > Hi OvmfPkg maintainers and reviewers,
> > I am working on removing IntelFrameworkModulePkg and IntelFrameworkPkg. The
> > biggest dependency now I see is the CSM
> -Original Message-
> From: Laszlo Ersek
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2018 5:54 PM
> To: Ni, Ruiyu ; Justen, Jordan L
> ; Ard Biesheuvel ;
> Anthony Perard ; Julien Grall
>
> Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Kevin O'Connor ; Gerd
> Hoffmann ; David Woodhouse
>
> Subject: Re: Drop CSM suppor
(Adding Kevin, Gerd, David)
On 12/17/18 03:23, Ni, Ruiyu wrote:
> Hi OvmfPkg maintainers and reviewers,
> I am working on removing IntelFrameworkModulePkg and IntelFrameworkPkg. The
> biggest dependency now I see is the CSM components that OVMF depends on.
> So I'd like to know your opinion about
Hi OvmfPkg maintainers and reviewers,
I am working on removing IntelFrameworkModulePkg and IntelFrameworkPkg. The
biggest dependency now I see is the CSM components that OVMF depends on.
So I'd like to know your opinion about how to handle this. I see two options
here:
1. Drop CSM support in
21 matches
Mail list logo
