On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 10/22/12 23:42, Jordan Justen wrote:
>> Structures should not be directly assigned in EDK II
>> code, since this leads to different behaviours on various
>> compilers.
>
> Yes, structure assignment can be implemented by memberwise copy or
>
On 10/22/12 23:42, Jordan Justen wrote:
> Structures should not be directly assigned in EDK II
> code, since this leads to different behaviours on various
> compilers.
Yes, structure assignment can be implemented by memberwise copy or
blanket memcpy(), as allowed by ISO C99 6.2.6.1p6. Why is that
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
> Hi, Jordan
> What's your opinion about this problem? Thanks!
Sorry. I'm still working to setup a Xen test environment.
Bei, Andrei,
How recently have you been able to test Xen with OVMF?
Do you have time to verify that the lates
Issue localized. Surprised that anyone with /W4 /WX on MS VC does not see this,
since this code can be seen by any X64 build that I can try. MSVC detects that
the union of an auto variable exceeds the storage on the stack.
The problem is that word0 uses the following union:
1. typedef
Structures should not be directly assigned in EDK II
code, since this leads to different behaviours on various
compilers.
Instead, use ZeroMem to zero out the structures.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jordan Justen
---
OvmfPkg/VirtioScsiDxe/VirtioScsi.c
Anyone seen these before? I can get them in one config but not another. In X64
word0 evaluates to a UINTN *
d:\bios\kernel\05.02.40\stdlib\libc\gdtoa\strtod.c(825) : error C2220: warning
treated as error - no 'object' file generated
d:\bios\kernel\05.02.40\stdlib\libc\gdtoa\strtod.c(825) : warni
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 12:02 -0700, Jordan Justen wrote:
> > > +STATIC
> > > +EFI_STATUS
> > > +SetupLinuxBootParams (
> > > + IN VOID *Kernel,
> > > + IN OUT struct boot_params *Bp
> > > + )
> > > +{
> > > + Bp->alt_mem_k = SIZE_32KB;
> >
> > This is a bit of legacy code and
The old EFI toolkit is for the old EDK, not EDK II. There are some major
differences in how services are presented in EDK II and the old way from the
EDK. This is most noticeable with networking -- EDK Toolkit networking apps.
will usually not work in EDK II.
If you use the Toolkit version of
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 10:45 +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 15:44 -0700, Jordan Justen wrote:
> > This code is based on efilinux's bzimage support.
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/boot/efilinux/efilinux.git
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jordan Justen
> > Cc: Matt Fleming
> > ---
> >
On 10/22/12 18:52, Jeff VanDellen wrote:
> I've come across the following information which seems relevant in
> regards to Windows 7/2008's UEFI requirements.
(The following passages are from [1], which I've referenced in section
III of [2].)
>
> "Display at Boot Time
> For a platform that has a
I've come across the following information which seems relevant in
regards to Windows 7/2008's UEFI requirements.
"Display at Boot Time
For a platform that has a console device, the UEFI 2.0 specification
requires the firmware to implement the Simple Text Output Protocol.
Optionally, the firmware
On 10/22/12 18:10, Jeff VanDellen wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> I prepared an AutoUnattend.xml file for the DVD root with WAIK. It does
>> get a bit farther (I can tell it from the VCPU load chart, it's very
>> characteristic), but it still stops somewhere wa
Greetings,
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 10/16/12 16:58, Jeff VanDellen wrote:
>
>> -Additionally, I have installed windows 2008 via vmware workstation 9
>> to an LVM slice.
>
> Was that with OVMF?
No, this was using vmware's implementation of EFI and installation
Thanks Ryan, that's a good point! I was trying to reproduce the issue with
the kernel he sent me on RTSM VE A9x4 and I do not see the Linux
decompression statement.
In the last email Nicola sent me, it looks he is using RTSM VE A15x2.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Harkin [mailto:ryan.har..
Olivier,
Nicola is referring to the A15-TC1 BSP that's in my tree, not to the
RTSM version...
Nicola,
On 22 October 2012 10:58, Nicola Johnsen wrote:
> So just that I understand this correctly: if there is no TZ controller on
> the board, then secure memory is just emulated?
As far as I could
Hi, Jordan
What's your opinion about this problem? Thanks!
Best Regards!
Arei
-Original Message-
From: Gonglei (Arei)
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 9:00 AM
To: 'Jordan Justen'
Cc: gbtj...@gmail.com; Andrei Warkentin
Subject: RE: xen OVMF problem
Jordan,
My environment is x
hi,
This is what I observed:
1) In EDK 2 bios, the efi\tools is not automatically recognised
2) i am unable to use the python.efi generated from building AppPkg. I
do not know the reason why. The same efi i use in APTIO and works fine.
3) When I use the python.efi generated by efi t
Do you mind to send me your kernel and device tree by email?
Please, do not send to the mailing-list.
From: Nicola Johnsen [mailto:nicolajohn...@yahoo.co.uk]
Sent: 22 October 2012 10:59
To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [edk2] Boot Linux on ARM: how to pass in FDT?
Yes it w
Yes it works booting the zImage from the local directory now, using
semihosting, however, I still get the same error when the kernel boots:
Error: unrecognized/unsupported device tree compatible list:
[ '(null)' ]
Is there a way that I can check that the right DTB is passed to the kernel?
A
So just that I understand this correctly: if there is no TZ controller on the
board, then secure memory is just emulated?
From: Olivier Martin
To: 'Nicola Johnsen' ;
edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Monday, 22 October 2012, 10:43
Subject: RE: [edk2] T
Sorry, I forgot this point. Yes, the default folder is the one where you
start the simulator from. Some Fast Model allows to redefines the
semihosting root (it does not seem to be the case on the Fast Model version
I have).
From: Nicola Johnsen [mailto:nicolajohn...@yahoo.co.uk]
Sent: 22 Octob
Thanks, that helps a lot. If I use semihosting, where on the host filesystem
does it look for files? In the directory that I run the simulator from?
Cheers.
From: Olivier Martin
To: 'Nicola Johnsen' ;
edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Monday, 22 Octob
Hi again,
New section about the Fast Model & Trustzone:
https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/tianocore/index.php?title=ArmPlatform
Pkg/ArmVExpressPkg#Example:_Trustzone_on_the_Fast_Model
Let me know if that answers your questions.
Cheers,
Olivier
-Original Message-
From: Nicola Johnse
Hi,
After updating the FDT with "[4] Update FDT path", do you restart the model?
I have just started a new section for Booting Linux on ARM Fast Model:
https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/tianocore/index.php?title=ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg#Example:_Booting_Linux_on_the_Model
Cheers
Hi, I was wondering how I can enable to boot into the Secure World on the VE
board with 2 Cortex-A15 CPUs?
It seems as if
ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg/Library/ArmVExpressLibCTA15x2/CTA15x2Sec.c says
that there is no support for TZ on that board, but as far as I understand, the
Cortex-A15 has
Hi Nicola,
If you apply the pending BaseTools patches:
patch -p0 <
ArmPlatformPkg/Documentation/patches/BaseTools-Pending-Patches.patch
that should solve your build errors.
The ARMLINUXGCC flags have been updated in the BaseTools repository but the
BaseTools have not been synced up with EDK2 repos
Hi, I'm using the latest EDK2 code and I'm trying to build a boot loader for
the VE board with the Cortex-A15:
build -a ARM -p ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-RTSM-A15_MPCore.dsc
-t ARMLINUXGCC
But I get the following error:
/code/uefi/tianocore/edk2/Build/ArmVExpress-RTSM-A15_MPCore
Hi I'm using the latest edk2 code and the ARM Fast Model simulator to run
Linux.
I used the guidance described here
http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/tianocore/index.php?title=ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg#Booting_Linux
and here
http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/tianocore/index.php?ti
28 matches
Mail list logo
