Re: split half reliability

2000-04-17 Thread Paul Gardner
Paul R Swank wrote: > > I disagree with the statement that the split-half reliability coefficient > is of no use anymore. Coefficient alpha, while being an excellent estimator > of reliability, does have one rather stringent requirement. The items must > be homogeneous. This is not always the cas

Re: linear model or interactive model?

2000-04-17 Thread Yuriy Koblents-Mishke
Wen-Feng Hsiao wrote: > > Dear Hartig, > > Thanks for your reply. I am sorry for my poor knowledge in statistics. > But I wonder why the definition of 'linearity' of statistics is different > from that of engineering mathematics, which defines 'linear' as: > > Each unknown xj appears to the

Re: hyp testing -Reply

2000-04-17 Thread Joe Ward
Hi, Robert and all -- Yes, there occasionally were discussions in our Air Force research whether or not we were working with the POPULATION or a SAMPLE. As Dennis comments: | | > the flaw here is that ... she has population data i presume ... or about | as | > close as one can come to it ... wi

Re: split half reliability

2000-04-17 Thread dennis roberts
At 04:26 PM 4/17/00 -0500, Paul R Swank wrote: >I disagree with the statement that the split-half reliability coefficient >is of no use anymore. Coefficient alpha, while being an excellent estimator >of reliability, does have one rather stringent requirement. The items must >be homogeneous. i don

Finding statistical significance between 2 groups with categorical variables

2000-04-17 Thread einsetein
We have 2 groups reporting on the major problem for attending college. We are trying to see if the different response numbers are statistically significant. For example one group responded with an answer 13 times and the other group 32 times. Since a chi square takes the mean of the two, it doe

Re: hyp testing -Reply

2000-04-17 Thread dennis roberts
At 08:07 PM 4/17/00 +, Charles D Madewell wrote: >As a working engineer and part time graduate student I do not even >understand why anyone would want to do away with hypothesis testing. >I have spent many, many hours of my graduate school life learning, >reading, calculating, and analyzing u

split half reliability

2000-04-17 Thread Paul R Swank
I disagree with the statement that the split-half reliability coefficient is of no use anymore. Coefficient alpha, while being an excellent estimator of reliability, does have one rather stringent requirement. The items must be homogeneous. This is not always the case with many kinds of scales, no

Re: What's the Mahanalobis distance?

2000-04-17 Thread Lorenzo Camprini
Teo ha scritto nel messaggio... >Anyone knows in what consist the Mahanalobis distance?? >I have to measure the distance between two histograms... > from the StatSoft website (Glossary): "Mahalanobis distance. One can think of the independent variables (in a regression equation) as defining a

Re: hyp testing -Reply

2000-04-17 Thread Charles D Madewell
As a working engineer and part time graduate student I do not even understand why anyone would want to do away with hypothesis testing. I have spent many, many hours of my graduate school life learning, reading, calculating, and analyzing using hypothesis tests. Hypothesis testing is not bad. It

Re: hyp testing -Reply

2000-04-17 Thread ssolla
Response embedded within message: In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The way this world is --- >A master's candidate, or a phD candidate, or a professor, >or a working scientist, has put a lot into his project. >In terms of time, in terms of money, and more

Re: cluster analysis in one-dimensional "circular" space

2000-04-17 Thread Rich Strauss
Since clustering methods begin with pairwise distances among observations, why not measure these distances as minimum arc-lengths along the best-fitting circle (or min chord lengths, or min angular deviations with respect to the centroid, etc)? This is how geographic distances are measured (in 2

Re: hyp testing -Reply

2000-04-17 Thread Robert Dawson
- Original Message - From: dennis roberts > At 10:32 AM 4/17/00 -0300, Robert Dawson wrote: > > > There's a chapter in J. Utts' mostly wonderful but flawed low-math intro > >text "Seeing Through Statistics", in which she does much the same. She > >presents a case study based on some o

Re: hyp testing

2000-04-17 Thread Bruce Weaver
On 15 Apr 2000, Donald F. Burrill wrote: > > > (2) My second objection is that if the positive-discrete > > > probability is retained for the value "0" (or whatever value the former > > > "no" is held to represent), the distribution of the observed quantity > > > cannot be one of the stand

Re: hyp testing -Reply

2000-04-17 Thread dennis roberts
At 10:32 AM 4/17/00 -0300, Robert Dawson wrote: > There's a chapter in J. Utts' mostly wonderful but flawed low-math intro >text "Seeing Through Statistics", in which she does much the same. She >presents a case study based on some of her own work in which she looked at >the question of gende

Re: Data Mining

2000-04-17 Thread Rich Ulrich
( how did we get to HERE, from Data Mining?) On 15 Apr 2000 17:50:05 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Radford Neal) wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Rich Ulrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >One thing that remains true about stock investment schemes: There may > >be some overall growth, s

The "best" effect size

2000-04-17 Thread Robert McGrath
I would appreciate feedback on the following from list members. I recently participated in a discussion at a conference that revolved around effect sizes. The discussion had to do with the clinical value of a set of predictors based on field studies. In these studies, the predictors (which were

RE: Split half coefficient?

2000-04-17 Thread Simon, Steve, PhD
busker writes: >I'm completely new to statistics but am putting together a >customer satisfaction survey, thanks to which I am daily >becoming fascinated by my whole new world of Means and >Medians and Variabilities and Variances, and so forth. I deleted the two questions about split half coeffi

Re: hyp testing -Reply

2000-04-17 Thread Robert Dawson
Bill Knight wrote: > The way this world is --- ... > SUMMARY: > * Don't be like a certain social sciences graduate > * student at our university who, after failing to reject her > * null hypothesis, nevertheless went on to draw conclusions > * from her data. (Worse than that, her department >

Re: hyp test:better def

2000-04-17 Thread Juha Puranen
Milo Schield wrote: > > I agree with Dennis that students need to be exposed to the use of Bayesian > priors within the process of teaching classical hypothesis testing. Using Bayesian priors can be very difficult for some students. (Why do we take the uniform prior ??? ) For to teach decissi

Re: What's the Mahanalobis distance?

2000-04-17 Thread dim.brumath
The Mahalanobis distance (MD) is distance between each observation and the mean of the others. For the obs. i MD(i)*MD(i)=(X(i)-mean(X))*inverse(S)*transpose(X(i)-mean(X)) where mean(X) is the mean of variables X, X(i) is values of variables X for i, S is the variance-covariance matrix of X. A rel