Re: Z Scores and stuff

2001-11-15 Thread Sandra CHANDLER
ilei (1564-1642)       ---you wrote Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 18:53:25 +From: John Kane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: Re: Z Scores and stuff[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:> Mark>> I contacted you directly to offer you some simple advice.  I suggested that> since the question you a

Re: Z Scores and stuff

2001-11-14 Thread Mark T
On Sun, 11 Nov 2001 12:09:41 -0600 jim clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here are the relevant parts of a program I use to generate and > solve z-distribution problems. I believe the value produced as p > is the cumulative probability below z1. The values are quite > precise and should agree

Re: Z Scores and stuff

2001-11-11 Thread Jay Warner
Mark T wrote: > On Fri, 09 Nov 2001 10:13:21 -0500 > Rich Ulrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 8 Nov 2001 18:31:57 +, Mark T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > What are the formulae for calculating the mean to z, larger proportion and >smaller proportion of a

Re: Z Scores and stuff

2001-11-10 Thread John Kane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Mark > > I contacted you directly to offer you some simple advice. I suggested that > since the question you asked is very basic and that it is covered in even the > most basic books on statistics that you go to the nearest university library > and browse through BUSIN

Re: Z Scores and stuff

2001-11-10 Thread RCKnodt
Mark I contacted you directly to offer you some simple advice. I suggested that since the question you asked is very basic and that it is covered in even the most basic books on statistics that you go to the nearest university library and browse through BUSINESS STATISTICS texts. I find that

Re: Z Scores and stuff

2001-11-10 Thread Mark T
On Sat, 10 Nov 2001 11:34:15 -0500 (EST) Donald Burrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You persist in repeating your original request in your original phrasing, > with no elaboration(s) that might resolve the ambiguities therein. Thanks very much for a completely unhelpful reply! > > Thanks for

Re: Z Scores and stuff

2001-11-10 Thread Donald Burrill
You persist in repeating your original request in your original phrasing, with no elaboration(s) that might resolve the ambiguities therein. On Sat, 10 Nov 2001, Mark T wrote: > On Fri, 09 Nov 2001 Rich Ulrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 8 Nov 2001 Mark T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro

Re: Z Scores and stuff

2001-11-10 Thread Mark T
On Fri, 09 Nov 2001 10:13:21 -0500 Rich Ulrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 8 Nov 2001 18:31:57 +, Mark T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > What are the formulae for calculating the mean to z, larger proportion and smaller >proportion of a z-score (standardised score)

Re: Z Scores and stuff

2001-11-09 Thread Rich Ulrich
On Thu, 8 Nov 2001 18:31:57 +, Mark T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > What are the formulae for calculating the mean to z, larger proportion and smaller >proportion of a z-score (standardised score) on a standard normal distribution? I >know about tables listing them all, but I want t

Re: Z Scores and stuff

2001-11-08 Thread Jay Warner
Mark T wrote: > Hi, > > What are the formulae for calculating the mean to z, larger proportion and smaller >proportion of a z-score (standardised score) on a standard normal distribution? I >know about tables listing them all, but I want to know how to work it out for myself >:o) At the risk