On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 16:01:54 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Duncan Murdoch)
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>On 28 Jan 2001 04:04:04 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Konrad
>Halupka) wrote:
>>Look up three papers which have been previously published in the PCPRo,
>>all by the same author, I guess.
>>
>
duncan ... glad you mentioned that ... and, i too got a little huffy when
i read this ... after all, it is a public site ... freely available to
all ... and, the stuff on this page about the 3 "papers" in
PCPro (by the way ... i did a good search and could not find anything
about this publication
On 28 Jan 2001 04:04:04 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Konrad
Halupka) wrote:
>Look up three papers which have been previously published in the PCPRo,
>all by the same author, I guess.
>
>http://www.woodleyside.co.uk/stats.htm
>
>(no passwords, but even quoting is "strictly forbidden")
The first of
Gerry Dizinno wrote:
>
> A while back someone posted a reference to an article (actually a web site
> that referenced the article) that purported to identify some serious errors
> associated with the statistical functions of Excel.
Look up three papers which have been previously published in th
i don't think so ... you need acrobat reader though
http://www.elsevier.nl/gej-ng/10/15/38/37/25/27/article.pdf
At 02:26 PM 1/27/01 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Except it seems to be restricted to people who have a subscription to
>the journal. Is there any alternative download site that any
Except it seems to be restricted to people who have a subscription to
the journal. Is there any alternative download site that anyone knows
of?
Thanks,
Graham S
.
=
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks ab
try this pdf file ... it is the text of this article
http://www.elsevier.nl/gej-ng/10/15/38/37/25/27/article.pdf
At 07:14 AM 1/26/01 +, p_at_c wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gerry Dizinno) wrote:
> > A while back someone posted a reference to an article (actua
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gerry Dizinno) wrote:
> A while back someone posted a reference to an article (actually a web
site
> that referenced the article) that purported to identify some serious
errors
> associated with the statistical functions of Excel. >
'On the accu
A while back someone posted a reference to an article (actually a web site
that referenced the article) that purported to identify some serious errors
associated with the statistical functions of Excel. I have misplaced both
the web site and the article. All I have recorded is that the article
app
