a UDP so I don't
see QoS being an issue on this network at this point.
Is EFW 2.2 capable of reading the QoS packet tagging?
McJerry wrote:
>
> Customer has a point-to-point fiber lan on 10.0.0.0/24 subnet between two
> locations. At the main location, the fiber to ethernet conn
compdoc, I thought about that yesterday while the Esi technician was onsite
and he wouldn't give me a straight answer. He's being hush hush about the
system and I'm having difficulty finding information about it. Very few
manuals I can find. The ports I'm dealing with are TCP ports 59001 and
59
Customer has a point-to-point fiber lan on 10.0.0.0/24 subnet between two
locations. At the main location, the fiber to ethernet connects to a 24
port switch. The internet fiber to ethernet connects to the WAN port (Red)
interface with static public IP on the EFW box. The GREEN interface is
ass
Yes, the internal servers and all workstations have the EFW box as the
default gateway. As I mentioned in my previous posts, all works fine with
EFW2.2 using same settings.
Jorge Armando Medina-2 wrote:
>
> McJerry wrote:
>> OK, so all I'm seeing at the community download
ports 5900 for VNC, port 1723 for VPN and port 25 for
SMTP to an internal exchange server. All works fine on 2.2.
compdoc wrote:
>
> Don't use 2.3rc1 - 2.3 has been released. What ports are you
> forwarding?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: McJerry [mailt
I've tried installing 2.3Rc1 twice now and it loads fine and routes traffic
outbound and via system access rules just fine. I've added a few port
forwarding rules to a couple of internal servers and it simply won't work.
Am I missing something here or is does port forwarding require additional
s
I've had efw 2.2rc2 running since its release and until today have had NO
problems. I have it configured with multiple uplinks on red,
green+blue+orange. Today, with 2.2rc2 running, client browsing became
extremely slow and at times would time out. I tried disabling uplinks one
at a time to rul
EFW release 2.2.rc2
Green 192.168.0.0/24
Blue 10.1.0.0/24
Orange 192.168.4.0/24
Red with multiple uplinks (2 uplinks)
HTTP proxy w/content filtering on
HTTP proxy transparent
HTTP proxy port 8080
I need to block access to xyz.com website for two systems on LAN
192.168.0.54 and 192.168.0.55
I ha
their programmers for more info, meanwhile, thanks for
the tip on spamassassin. If other suggestions, please post thoughts...
Thanks,
Jerry
McJerry wrote:
>
> Running Endian Firewall Community release 2.2.rc2 at customer site and one
> of their vendors is asking we make sure tha
their programmers for more info, meanwhile, thanks for
the tip on spamassassin. If other suggestions, please post thoughts...
Thanks,
Jerry
McJerry wrote:
>
> Running Endian Firewall Community release 2.2.rc2 at customer site and one
> of their vendors is asking we make sure tha
their programmers for more info, meanwhile, thanks for
the tip on spamassassin. If other suggestions, please post thoughts...
Thanks,
Jerry
McJerry wrote:
>
> Running Endian Firewall Community release 2.2.rc2 at customer site and one
> of their vendors is asking we make sure tha
their programmers for more info, meanwhile, thanks for
the tip on spamassassin. If other suggestions, please post thoughts...
Thanks,
Jerry
McJerry wrote:
>
> Running Endian Firewall Community release 2.2.rc2 at customer site and one
> of their vendors is asking we make sure tha
Running Endian Firewall Community release 2.2.rc2 at customer site and one of
their vendors is asking we make sure that "Remove unknown headers in the
firewall is unchecked." Since this is likely a default setting for some
commercial firewalls, what would be the equivilent action to take with EFW
I am experiencing similar but not exact problem with 2.2.rc2:
NO VMWare...
P4 2.0Ghz, 1GB Ram, 80GB IDE
5 Nics
Green/Orange/Blue/Red(Main Uplink)/Red(2nd Uplink)
192.168.2.1/192.168.3.1/192.168.4.1/192.168.1.139/10.28.210.251
With Main Uplink and 2nd Uplink in Managed mode, unplugging Main Upl
What would cause proxy logs...specificaly smtp proxy logs to render slowly in
the webgui? Same problem persists for IE and Firefox. Viewing one page of
SMTP logs takes approximately 2 minutes.
Using EFW 2.2RC2
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Proxy-logs-slow-rendering-tp1
Can you be more specific as to what Web Server Software you are running on
both web servers? (i.e. iis or apache?)
As is my case: I have Domain1 dns pointing to my ip, Domain2 dns also
pointing to my ip. Domain1 resides on iis7 server while Domain2 resides on
apache2 server. All port 80 traffic
Nothing special, just configure your routing rules as you would any other
situation.
While I do not use EFW presently in production, I am using IPCop to
accomodate like setups to what you described. It works well and EFW worked
well when we used it. Windows 2003 Server or Windows 2008 Server ar
I had to abandon EFW almost a year ago due to a customer's filtering needs
and the ability of IPCop with the Copfilter and URLFilter addons.
What would be the best approach to accomplishing the same functionality with
efw-2.2rc1? URLFilter allows custom whitelist and addition of workstation's
IP
Is anyone having trouble with Clamav-0.91.1 and POP3 scanning? I upgraded
with the latest packages and am having to reset the POP3 proxy scan. Email
clients are unable to communicate with pop3 server. After downgrading to
Clamav-0.90.3 I am not having this issue.
Anyone else with same problem?
I have EFW 2.0 running at several locations. VPN Server running with one
location as VPN Client.
The Server location is 10.28.210.xx and the client location is 10.28.215.xx.
VPN connection is fine and traffic is routing from client lan to server lan
just fine.
Server side LAN has a server runni
Should work no differently than having a router upstream with your ISP.
My only concern would be if you have incoming ports forwarded to specific
servers or IP's then you would have to forward a forward so to speak. But
all should work. I had tested a similar setup here once and also had two
su
See if this post answers you question and helps
http://www.nabble.com/Havp-0.86-posted-tf3602461.html
Bent Are Fikse-3 wrote:
>
> Thanks alot for the precise answer :-)
>
> --
> Bent, Norway
>
>
> -
> This SF.net email
I have an internal server running a program called email2db. The program
polls a pop3 server and parses the emails ini certain accounts based on
triggers. The problem I am having is that when the pop3 email scanner is
enabled on green, email2db can connect to the pop3 account and see how many
me
Have enabled pop3 proxy again and will watch for errors in logs, will let you
know when it happens again.
Jerry
McJerry wrote:
>
> Mike,
>
> Not sure where else to look, but the filtering the firewall log for P3SCAN
> results in following:
>
> Time Chain Iface Prot
previous days and see no error. Where else would
I need to look?
Thanks,
Jerry
Mike Tremaine wrote:
>
> McJerry wrote:
>> How much memory did you have before and after?
>> This particular server has 1GB. Running free -m results:
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # free -m
&g
/cache:186824
Swap: 2023 34 1989
Not sure if adding another 1GB will offer better results. What do you
think?
Jerry
Esteban Ordóñez wrote:
>
> El Viernes, 2 de Febrero de 2007 10:35, McJerry escribió:
>>
>> on efw 2.0 production firewall
on efw 2.0 production firewall i have pop3 proxy enabled with antivirus and
antispan checked.
everything works fine, spam messages are being tagged correctly for the most
part.
after 2 or 3 days, users are unable to access email accounts.
outlook users get error...unable to access the pop3 mail se
Glad you got it working!
Jerry
Mircea Draghici wrote:
>
> Hi Jerry,
>
> thx for your answer. I reinstalled endian myself and stoped everything
> just to make sure. In the end it turned out that it was a stupid mistake -
> the destination machine had a different gateway set up on the LAN
> in
Performed fresh install of efw 2.1 on development box today. Had no problems
with port forwarding. Could you please advise what ports/applications you
are attempting to forward. Have you made sure any software firewall on the
destination machine is not blocking the ports you are forwarding.
Re
What would be an acceptable solution for blocking proxy sites that allow
users to browse sites even though they are blocked in the content filter.
For example, I have pornography blocked and several sites listed that are
not allowed; however, employees are still able to access these sites by
firs
ne is running on production system - but
> you
> can give it a try!
>
> regards,
> mario
>
>
> McJerry wrote:
>>
>> Is there a way to add a port range as opposed to creating a rule for
> each
>> single port? (i.e. 5800-5900 for VNC) I have a client who requir
Is there a way to add a port range as opposed to creating a rule for each
single port? (i.e. 5800-5900 for VNC) I have a client who requires numerous
ports in a range opened for a video multicast streaming from multiple
locations. I am having to enter 12 different ports with varying TCP or UDP
or
Is there any way we could implement a captive portal on the same EFW 2.0 box.
Currently I have a RED and GREEN interface. If I add a BLUE Interface and
install a Linksys WRT54GS wireless router would there be anyway to have the
EFW box redirect redirect my wifi users to a captive portal page whe
Did you get problem resolved? After establishing Green link and successfully
accessing browser interface, did you configure RED interface to use DHCP or
static settings from your ISP? If so, cycle power to modem(internet) then
set RED interface to use DHCP and obtain new IP lease. Then if prefe
Questions:
Is it a DNS resolution error? Have you tried opening the site by using the
sites IP address? When hooked to your first internet connection do you have
your RED interface obtaining public IP address via DHCP or are you setting
Static IP?
When hooking to second internet connection is
if you need
me to test any other updates as I have two pc's running EFW community.
Regards,
Jerry
Yayad wrote:
>
> Jerry, any trouble on your production EFW?
>
>
> McJerry wrote:
>>
>> Mike,
>>
>> Thanks for the quick response!!!
>>
>>
:
>
> McJerry wrote:
>> The current 2.0 and 2.0 RESPIN ISO's contain 0.81 HAVP release which has
>> confirmed bug reading headers. This causes some pages to become
>> inaccessible.
>>
>> Are there any plans to release an rpm that will provide current HAVP
>> re
The current 2.0 and 2.0 RESPIN ISO's contain 0.81 HAVP release which has
confirmed bug reading headers. This causes some pages to become
inaccessible.
Are there any plans to release an rpm that will provide current HAVP release
for EFW?
How can I compile newer HAVP version for EFW myself?
An
38 matches
Mail list logo
