Thu May 25 21:56:03 EDT
> >> 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Exact scenario occurred for me as well.
> >>>
> >>> ---
i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>>>
>>> Exact scenario occurred for me as well.
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
gt;
>
> Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>>
>> Exact scenario occurred for me as well.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of woodrowbone
>> Sent: October-16-07 3:55 AM
>> To: efw-user@lists.
2.1 or 2.12...
>
> But I only use Red snort, not green as well..
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of CoryC
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 10:19 AM
> To: efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re:
-user] Problems updating snort
Peter,
Which version of the rules are you using?
When I put the url for the registered user in a
browser I get an error message that says "Oink!! The
page you requested doesn't exist.". When I change the
url to 2.4.tar.gz I get prompted to save the file
Are ppl having a problem with the older version of efw? I press the update
community rules button on the newest efw, and have no problems..
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to
Peter,
Which version of the rules are you using?
When I put the url for the registered user in a
browser I get an error message that says "Oink!! The
page you requested doesn't exist.". When I change the
url to 2.4.tar.gz I get prompted to save the file.
However, if I try to use the 2.3 subscr
Peter,
Which version of the rules are you using?
When I put the url for the registered user in a
browser I get an error message that says "Oink!! The
page you requested doesn't exist.". When I change the
url to 2.4.tar.gz I get prompted to save the file.
However, if I try to use the 2.3 subscr
Hi
Peter Warasin wrote:
> But, our ids.cgi makes 2 downloads at a time in order to check if
> something has changed and starts the full download only if there is a
> new version on the server.
> Now this check cannot be done anymore. Will see if there is another
> possibility.
Uhm.. tried again a
hi
woodrowbone wrote:
> Thx a lot h h-2! =)
> I guess this is a task for the devs. to take care of, I hope they read this
> mailing list or?
Yes we are reading, but *currently* more or less passively.
I analysed the problem, will fix it for next version which will appear soon.
The problem is n
Ok, so doing this broke snort but starting snort from
command line I was able to see that it had issues with
some of the rules. I had to edit /etc/snort/snort.conf
and comment out the following rulesets to get it to
work:
include $RULE_PATH/ftp.rules
include $RULE_PATH/web-client.rules
include $RU
DON'T DO THIS ! Don't change the ids page.
If you have then check your Status page. Your IDS status will show its not
running. Like mine!
The 2.4 version, as you would expect if you think about it, look like they
aren't compatible with 2.3
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/
Thx a lot h h-2! =)
I guess this is a task for the devs. to take care of, I hope they read this
mailing list or?
h h-2 wrote:
>
> The problem with the updating of snort rules is that
> the 2.3 ruleset is no longer available on snort.org.
>
> I modified the /home/httpd/cgi-bin/ids.cgi file an
The problem with the updating of snort rules is that
the 2.3 ruleset is no longer available on snort.org.
I modified the /home/httpd/cgi-bin/ids.cgi file and
replaced 2.3 with 2.4 and didn't get the error when I
clicked on "download new ruleset". It showed that
updated rules were downloaded but I
enario occurred for me as well.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of woodrowbone
> Sent: October-16-07 3:55 AM
> To: efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Efw-user] Problems updating snort
>
>
> Cou
compdoc a écrit :
> I don’t think there is a link between the two.
>
> And the content filter does work. I have two customers who keep their
> employees
> off those websites that are most likely to infect your computer with some
> virus.
>
>
> In fact, it works too well - the wrong word on the ne
hite lists: (as needed)
If you've set this, and it still isnt working, try rebooting the efw.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephane Parenton
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 11:53 AM
To: efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re:
Joseph L. Casale a écrit :
> Exact scenario occurred for me as well.
>
Hi everyone, here again, on a brand new install with 2.1.2, an old oink
and a brand new one... it all end up with the same result, md5 error
first and invalid oink after this...
But it does not end here... I tried the cont
Exact scenario occurred for me as well.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of woodrowbone
Sent: October-16-07 3:55 AM
To: efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Efw-user] Problems updating snort
Could some more people verify that this is
00:25
>> To: efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: [Efw-user] Problems updating snort
>>
>>
>> Hi guys!
>> All of a sudden I get these messages when trying to update the IDS
>> (snort)
>> First this mess: Invalid MD5Sum.
>> Then
14. Oktober 2007 00:25
> To: efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Efw-user] Problems updating snort
>
>
> Hi guys!
> All of a sudden I get these messages when trying to update the IDS (snort)
> First this mess: Invalid MD5Sum.
> Then this: Access refused with thi
Hi guys!
All of a sudden I get these messages when trying to update the IDS (snort)
First this mess: Invalid MD5Sum.
Then this: Access refused with this oinkcode
I did try to make a new account at snort with a new oinkcode but no go >-(
Anyone knows why:confused:
Woodrow
--
View this message in
22 matches
Mail list logo
