I have to agree about the lack of community-response in general. It's a
great firewall/appliance, but they make it way too hard to customize,
tweak and update for an open-source product. I built my own, mini, dev
environment in order to patch a few things, but will certainly look into
the one
> I'm now testing ZeroShell and pfSense.
I'm waiting for a linux firewall that supports ipv6 in the GUI to make ipv6
easy to work with. Until then, Endian will work...
--
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrast
> I think you are probably right, Endian doesn't seem to be all that
> responsive. They also don't seem all that interested in
> complying with the GPL license. I sent an email directly to the folks
> associated with the EFW sourceforge project. If
> I don't hear anything back from them in the next
>
> --
>
> *From: *"Derek Sims"
> *To: *efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> *Sent: *Saturday, November 10, 2012 11:28:40 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [Efw-user] Missing SRPMs and new Developer Environment
>
> Robert
>
> I like the idea - my thoughts are tha
: "Derek Sims"
| To: efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
| Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 11:28:40 PM
| Subject: Re: [Efw-user] Missing SRPMs and new Developer Environment
| Robert
| I like the idea - my thoughts are that waiting for something from
| endian will mean nothing ever happens.
| A
Robert
I like the idea - my thoughts are that waiting for something from endian
will mean nothing ever happens.
Any chance of posting your download paths etc - I would like to give it
a try.
I would (also) like to see if it is possible to install efw on a
standard distro such as centos or de
ripts that are used to
rebuild all the source rpms in the correct order and installs the resulting
-devel packages.
- Original Message -
| From: "d davolio"
| To: efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
| Sent: Friday, November 9, 2012 4:24:05 AM
| Subject: Re: [Efw-user] Missing SRP
I admit my ignorance but I'm missing more than a few step here :))
Like is this useful to build simple binaries from source? I mean, you
had to put together the development environment because there isn't one?
I'm thinking of something like gcc/make or more a "build-essentials"
virtual package
