On 3/15/2016 3:17 PM, Alan wrote:
> I suspect that HT lines are probably less likely to have arcing than
> lower-voltage lines, simply because it would be a much bigger problem
> for the power company if they did.
Arcing represents a loss of energy, which for most power utilities means
loss of re
You should copy this to the RFI mail list, so the ARRL folks are made
aware that has become policy for a power company...
--
73's, and thanks,
Dave (NK7Z)
For software/hardware reviews see:
http://www.nk7z.net
For MixW support see:
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mixw/info
For SSTV help see
Actually, there have been some problems from those high voltage lines. I
believe these are on the order of 300kV. Official word from PG&E is that
they will not make any repairs solely for RFI because it's too expensive
to do it.
73,
Josh W6XU
On 3/15/2016 3:17 PM, Alan wrote:
The 6 meter moon
The 6 meter moonbouncer who lives up the hill from me told me he has no
problem from the high-tension line that runs right by his place but has
experienced noise from the lower-voltage lines farther down the hill.
I suspect that HT lines are probably less likely to have arcing than
lower-volta
On Tue,3/15/2016 12:56 PM, Rose wrote:
It sounds like you're speaking of a distribution line. Do you have
any idea that the voltage is? Is there more than one pole at each
cross arm? It could be almost anything up to 240 KV ... or more.
In my semi-rural area the voltage for distribution is 14.
Hi Chris!
It sounds like you're speaking of a distribution line. Do you have
any idea that the voltage is? Is there more than one pole at each
cross arm? It could be almost anything up to 240 KV ... or more.
In my semi-rural area the voltage for distribution is 14.4 KV, which
is pretty usual th
6 matches
Mail list logo
