Re: [Elecraft] P3 display versus FlexRadio

2018-05-13 Thread Vic Rosenthal
This is what I do. Then I read the noise level in dBm from the screen. Very useful to compare noise levels at different times, etc. But what I would like is a menu command that could be assigned to one of the function keys to automatically compute the average noise level and then adjust the

Re: [Elecraft] P3 display versus FlexRadio

2018-05-12 Thread Jim Brown
Hi Martin, I have a somewhat different solution to your problem, and it consists of multiple parts. First, I set averaging to maximum (I set it years ago, don't ask me numbers). :) Second, I set Scale to 24 dB when I'm not contesting, 32 dB for 100W contests, 42 dB for high power

Re: [Elecraft] P3 display versus FlexRadio

2018-05-12 Thread Martin Sole
I'm not all that familiar with the Flex stuff but in some SDR software display systems it is possible to adjust the waterfall sensitivity and contrast independent of any spectrum bandscope position adjustment. It is often also possible to have any signal levels indicated by such displays bear

Re: [Elecraft] P3 display versus FlexRadio

2018-05-12 Thread Wayne Burdick
Hi Jim, They may be automatically calculating a long-term-average noise floor, then subtracting it from the waterfall. The P3 could do the same thing. But automatic noise subtraction would have the same disadvantage as slow AGC: a temporary rise in the noise floor would mask weak signals for

[Elecraft] P3 display versus FlexRadio

2018-05-12 Thread Jim N7US
I saw a demo last night of the FlexRadio bandscope. It showed the noise well above, on the Y-axis, the bottom of the display, but the waterfall didn't show the noise, just the signals on the band. When I set the REL LVL on my P3 so the noise floor is below the noise, the waterfall is blue