Hi there Elecraft programmers,
Feature request here...
Would it be possible to add a user controllable switch in the P3 setup
for the Transmit monitor, which allows the numeric SWR and POWER reading
to be held, as opposed to being removed at termination of transmit?
Thanks for considering...
P3 feature request: I'd like to be able to connect both a mouse and keyboard
and use the mouse for click to tune operation, drag and zoom, drag and
unzoom.etc..
I'm currently using $50 setup that requires a computer. If the P3 had mouse
features I'd strongly consider and probably buy it instead
I was joking. Apparently "cookies, milk, and a Corona on Christmas Eve"
wasn't as obvious as I thought it would be.
73,
Fred K6DGW
- Northern California Contest Club
- CU in the 50th Running of the Cal QSO Party 3-4 Oct 2015
- www.cqp.org
On 12/10/2014 9:28 PM, Vic Rosenthal wrote:
If we are
That's actually pretty much what I have used CW Skimmer for in several
contests. I feed the audio from my K3 into my computer sound card, and
I use CW Skimmer in "Audio Mode" (essentially single single frequency
audio bandwidth) without the decoding feature enabled. In other words,
I use C
Even better would be if someone could develop software to display logger
bandmap on the P3SVGA monitor.
73,
Hank, W6SX
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Vic Rosenthal wrote:
Ever miss a letter in a call or aren't sure if a DX station came back to
> you? The information is still there, sitting
This is exactly the effect you get with cocoModem on PSK. Click
on the waterfall and everything from then to now is decoded,
possibly again. With two decoding windows (like VFOs), I
generally tune around with both but use both to decode while
making a QSO. The slightly different decoding freque
If we are in the realm of science fiction, here is what I want (after my flying
car):
Ever miss a letter in a call or aren't sure if a DX station came back to you?
The information is still there, sitting in the memory of the P3, scrolling down
the waterfall. On a large monitor it is there for a
How about CWskimmer? It will help you track where you have sent them... ;>)
73 ..mike AI6II
--
View this message in context:
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/P3-feature-request-tp7595780p7595784.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_
Asking for new features seems to have become common, you'd think Wayne
was Santa Claus and the employees were his elves. I'd like to weigh in
with one for me ...
I've gotten a bit active in NTS, I even agreed to NCS one night a week.
I was very active in NTS in the mid-50's as a teenager. M
00)
To: d...@w3fpr.com,Harry Yingst ,Elecraft
Reflector Subject: Re: [Elecraft] P3
Feature Request?
We are actively working on the P3 sensor watt-meter and TX envelope
display
option right now. We are testing the firmware for it now.
Stay tuned!
Eric
elecraft.com
On 12/9/2014 7:23 AM, Don Wil
It would be nice to be able to use the W2's sensors for
those who have bought them
At 07:34 PM 12/9/2014, you wrote:
1. A small sensor input board that plugs into the existing boards on the P3.
2. A RF sensor, similar, but not identical circuitry, to our
existing directional coup
Why obviously? If it were obvious then I would not have asked the
question...
Perhaps they intended to have this feature, and had the sensors built
in?
--
Thanks and 73's,
For equipment, and software setups and reviews see:
www.nk7z.net
for MixW support see;
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups
Possibly, with modification to several component values on the board inside, but
I can't guarantee that they will still work with the W2 after modification.
Eric
elecraft.com
On 12/9/2014 5:34 PM, Robert Nobis wrote:
Will the W2 Wattmeter sensors be usable?
Bob - N7RJN
n7...@nobis.net
Fairly obvious that an external sensor will be needed, probably the same (or
similar) sensors to what is used for the W2 wattmeter. Also, since there is
no current corresponding input on the P3, an option board will be required
for that. (Strictly speculation on my part, but fairly obvious to me)
A
1. A small sensor input board that plugs into the existing boards on the P3.
2. A RF sensor, similar, but not identical circuitry, to our existing
directional couplers for the W2. (It has a faster time constant to support RF
envelope display.)
73,
Eric
elecraft.com
On 12/9/2014 5:12 PM, Davi
Will the W2 Wattmeter sensors be usable?
Bob - N7RJN
n7...@nobis.net
> On Dec 9, 2014, at 18:15, Don Wilhelm wrote:
>
> David,
>
> Obviously, the sensor would have to be purchased.
> I do not know whether additional P3 option boards will be necessary or not.
>
> 73,
> Don W3FPR
>
> On
David,
Obviously, the sensor would have to be purchased.
I do not know whether additional P3 option boards will be necessary or not.
73,
Don W3FPR
On 12/9/2014 8:12 PM, David Cole wrote:
Will hardware need to be purchased, or is it already in place on the
rigs?
__
Will hardware need to be purchased, or is it already in place on the
rigs?
--
Thanks and 73's,
For equipment, and software setups and reviews see:
www.nk7z.net
for MixW support see;
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mixw/info
for Dopplergram information see:
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/dop
Alright. .
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
Original message From: "Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ,
Elecraft" Date:12/09/2014 3:14 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: d...@w3fpr.com,Harry Yingst ,Elecraft
Reflector Subject: Re: [Elecraft] P3
Feature Re
We are actively working on the P3 sensor watt-meter and TX envelope display
option right now. We are testing the firmware for it now.
Stay tuned!
Eric
elecraft.com
On 12/9/2014 7:23 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
Not at this time, however the sensor is on the list for a future option. I do
not have
Not at this time, however the sensor is on the list for a future
option. I do not have any information about when it will be available,
but I would expect it to be sometime soon, there have been several
recent queries about it on the reflector.
73,
Don W3FPR
On 12/9/2014 9:51 AM, Harry Yings
Yes, hopefully when the "Sensor Input" is activated. That would be the
cat's meow or "cool", for you 60's types.
73, Chs
- Original Message -
From: "Harry Yingst via Elecraft"
To: "Elecraft Reflector"
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2
Is it possible to have the P3 Display the transmitted signal(well as much as is
available form the IF)
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:El
Note that it only shows up on the P3 itself and not on an external monitor.
-Greg NY6C
On Feb 19, 2014, at 1:36 PM, Alan Bloom wrote:
> If you enable the menu entry "WfallMkrs" the markers appear on the waterfall.
>
> Alan N1AL
>
>
> On 02/19/2014 12:22 PM, Gary Smith wrote:
>> I would find
If you enable the menu entry "WfallMkrs" the markers appear on the
waterfall.
Alan N1AL
On 02/19/2014 12:22 PM, Gary Smith wrote:
I would find it helpful if the P3 markers A, B & center could be made
to extend below the signal line & into the waterfall; it would help
to center on the precise
I would find it helpful if the P3 markers A, B & center could be made
to extend below the signal line & into the waterfall; it would help
to center on the precise desired location to QSY to rather than
guesstimate with the markers being obscured by the spectrum trace on
top.
Thank you,
Gary
K
"
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] P3 Feature Request - Transmit sampling
Message-ID: <1380125612061-7579228.p...@n2.nabble.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
As your post indicates, the splattering of JT65 signals has most likely
nothing to do with your
My normal technique with sound card modes (mostly PSK31) is to
look at the audio AtoD overload indicator in my software and
reduce the RF gain so it indicates no overload. This procedure
uses the minimum necessary gain through most of the radio/AtoD
etc, limiting local distortion products. It w
Yep, that is 100% correct.
If the station that is offended would simply reduce their RF gain control,
in most cases they will see the signal clean right up. Then the real issue
is that they want to copy a weak signal that is in a chunk of spectrum that
is full of strong signals (most likely due t
Well nothing would put the issue to bed better than a nice printout of a P3
screen that was sampling the RF signal over a bandwidth of about 6KHz.
That's why I would LOVE for Elecraft to continue developing the P3 and
expanding its capability.
I don't mind the report, and I take it seriously, but
That clears up something that has bothered me on JT65. Many times
someone will complain about someone overdriving, but the signal appeared
to be OK to me. It happens frequently. Now I think the "complainer" is
probably receiving the station much more strongly than I am and it is
overdriving his
ginal Message -
From: "Ron D'Eau Claire"
To: "Bob"
Cc: "Elecraft"
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 11:31:25 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] P3 Feature Request - Transmit sampling
FWIW, overload from a strong local signal can cause much weaker signals to
beh
another Ham band, so it was not obvious to the operator.
73, Ron AC7AC
-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of kc2vmp
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 8:34 AM
To: Bob
Cc: Elecraft
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] P3 Feature
If your neighbor tells you it's clean (and s/he knows how to look) then it's
likely the other station at fault. Noise blanking, noise reduction, poor RX
audio (over)driving are huge issues that can make any reception look bad.
Bottom line: don't sweat it if your local stations tell you you're
As your post indicates, the splattering of JT65 signals has most likely
nothing to do with your transmitter and setup. It is more likely to be due
to the specifics of the JT65 display/decoding algorithm than anything else.
I have done spectral estimation for some 30+ years and it reminds me very
mu
I am really hoping the "Sensor" port will be used for this! (Soon?)
kc2vmp
On Sep 24, 2013, at 10:09 AM, Bob wrote:
> So I've been loving my P3 for about 2 years now, and I keep looking at that
> lonely sensor window in the back, dreaming and wishing
>
> Yesterday I received an email from
Out of any real estate optimization and the money needed to buy it,
this link may show a needed parent to what we are asking for.
http://www.telepostinc.com/LP-500.html
When delivered, it would have the requested features and even more. Isn't it?
73 de iw1ayd Salvo
PS this rememb
If this feature is offered in the near future, it would be nice if the
following features were incorporated
into the making the P3 a very useful station tool.
1. Since the Dynamic range is rather limited on the P3, the ability or feature
to allow
1 or 2 crystal notch filters to be inserted i
oing its job.
Then one would suggest it could be toggled on and off What a wonderful
thought hint hint.
Mel, K6KBE
From: Gary Gregory
To: Sam Morgan
Cc: "elecraft@mailman.qth.net"
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 8:06 AM
Subject: Re:
Geoff
G3UCK
-Original Message- From: Mel Farrer
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 8:49 PM
To: Gary Gregory ; Sam Morgan
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] P3 Feature Request - Transmit sampling
I would like to state a glitch that happens once in a great while on my
P3. It
all
Geoff
G3UCK
-Original Message-
From: Mel Farrer
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 8:49 PM
To: Gary Gregory ; Sam Morgan
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] P3 Feature Request - Transmit sampling
I would like to state a glitch that happens once in a great while on my P3
What a wonderful
thought hint hint.
Mel, K6KBE
From: Gary Gregory
To: Sam Morgan
Cc: "elecraft@mailman.qth.net"
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 8:06 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] P3 Feature Request - Transmit sampling
Sam,
I still beli
Resolution would be the same as on received signals - frequency resolution of
span/450 and amplitude range 10 - 80 dB. One gotcha is that the P3 only
handles IF's up to 21.7 MHz so presumably there would need to be some
hardware to allow up to 54 MHz.
I'm also looking forward to a transmit monitor
> It's become very difficult to locate an SM-230 monitor in the used
> market and even when you do, they are asking an arm and a leg. I've
> got a pretty clean one, but I can't find anyone who seems to be able
> to service the unit.
A basic transmit monitor (amplitude domain) is extremely easy
What if one defined the IF of the P3 to be at some PSK frequency and
connect a loop of wire to it's RF input? Put the loop on the desk.
There might not be enough resolution to clearly see anything but gross
PSK signal infidelities.
73 de Brian/K3KO
On 9/24/2013 16:40, Edward R Cole wrot
Hi Tom,
It's become very difficult to locate an SM-230 monitor in the used market and
even when you do, they are asking an arm and a leg. I've got a pretty clean
one, but I can't find anyone who seems to be able to service the unit. As you
state It does do a pretty good job though for monitor
I don't have a P3, so my curiosity is only academic.
The "sampling function" being referred to, would bring a low power
sample of transmit power to the P3? This does not seem very
difficult to "roll your own" sampler. I gather the P3 has the needed
RF ckts to receive RF and demod it, or is
Even if they never add the feature, wouldn't it be better to use a
device like the Kenwood SM-230 monitor, rather than giving up an
excellent XCVR for the sake of monitoring youe signal?
Tom
N5GE
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:03:50 -0500, you wrote:
>I know we aren't suppose to do the 'me to' kind of
Just to add that three others have replied to me (as opposed to the entire
group) saying they would like to see this too.
I suspect this would be a wildly popular item. I've sort of bought
everything Elecraft has to offer. I need a new accessory to continue
transferring my money to Eric and Wayn
I know we aren't suppose to do the 'me to' kind of posts here
and before hundreds of others add theirs and the topic gets canned
(again)...
as far as I am concerned this is the only remaining 'feature' that ruins
an otherwise perfect station combo.
perhaps the Flex is worth looking at again
Sam,
I still believe in the ol saying...the squeeky wheel get's the oil...so
it's good to keep our requests up.
73
On 25 September 2013 01:03, Sam Morgan wrote:
> I know we aren't suppose to do the 'me to' kind of posts here
> and before hundreds of others add theirs and the topic gets canned
On 24/09/2013 15:11, Gary Gregory wrote:
Your not alone...:-(
+1
This is one of the nicer features of my Flex1500
Stewart/G3YSX
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qt
Your not alone...:-(
On 25 September 2013 00:09, Bob wrote:
> So I've been loving my P3 for about 2 years now, and I keep looking at that
> lonely sensor window in the back, dreaming and wishing
>
> Yesterday I received an email from a ham a few thousand miles away asking
> me to clean up m
So I've been loving my P3 for about 2 years now, and I keep looking at that
lonely sensor window in the back, dreaming and wishing
Yesterday I received an email from a ham a few thousand miles away asking
me to clean up my signal -- I was running JT65 at the time, and he saw my
signal decode o
I usually do not like "me too" posts, but:
I *_really_* like the idea of showing a high contrast line on the P3
with the absolute frequency the K3 will transmit on. No exceptions, it
must include split, QSK, XIT, CW, SSB, REV, etc. This line could have
menu options to be suppressed if the VOX
Thanks Ian,
You got your brain round the explanation, where mine failed...
73
Stewart G3RXQ
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:31:24 +, Ian White GM3SEK wrote:
> Alan Bloom wrote:
>>I agree that XIT is probably used much less often than VFO B to control
>>the transmit frequency. I think a lot of people u
Nels Anderson
Sent: 14 March 2011 20:21
To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] P3 Feature Request
Along the same lines, it would be handy when running split if the P3
displayed both the VFO A and VFO B frequencies. This would provide an
additional reminder that you are running split
X
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Alan Bloom"
> To: "Stan Gibbs"
> Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 12:32:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] P3 Feature Request
>
> I agree that XIT is probably used much less of
Alan,
> I agree that XIT is probably used much less often than VFO B to
> control the transmit frequency. I think a lot of people use RIT
> (which does affect the cursor frequency on the P3) but fewer use
> XIT.
I'm not sure I agree with you ... I know I regularly use XIT when
chasing a CW DX an
Hi Alan,
If it came to a vote, I would suggest the use of a full height vertical line
to indicate one's transmitter frequency on any panadapter's spectrum
display, because it is much easier to see than a cursor or a marker or a
couple of little arrows, especially at 3 am. Also when using a full
Alan Bloom wrote:
>I agree that XIT is probably used much less often than VFO B to control
>the transmit frequency. I think a lot of people use RIT (which does
>affect the cursor frequency on the P3) but fewer use XIT.
>
The main use for XIT is in CW contests and simplex DX pileups, to apply
a
tan Gibbs"
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 12:32:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] P3 Feature Request
I agree that XIT is probably used much less often than VFO B to control
the transmit frequency. I think a lot of people use RIT (which does
affect the cursor freq
I agree that XIT is probably used much less often than VFO B to control
the transmit frequency. I think a lot of people use RIT (which does
affect the cursor frequency on the P3) but fewer use XIT.
In either case, it would be nice to have an indication of the actual
transmit frequency on the P3.
Behalf Of Stewart
> Sent: 14 March 2011 11:03
> To: Stephen Prior; elecraft
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] P3 Feature Request
>
> This must be fairly high up on the to do list.
>
> Using SPLIT and VFO B is not really a satisfactory alternative.
>
> 73
> Stewart G3RXQ
>
Behalf Of Stewart
Sent: 14 March 2011 11:03
To: Stephen Prior; elecraft
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] P3 Feature Request
This must be fairly high up on the to do list.
Using SPLIT and VFO B is not really a satisfactory alternative.
73
Stewart G3RXQ
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:20:13 +, Stephen Prior wrote
This must be fairly high up on the to do list.
Using SPLIT and VFO B is not really a satisfactory alternative.
73
Stewart G3RXQ
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:20:13 +, Stephen Prior wrote:
> I would second this request.
>
> 73 Stephen G4SJP
>
> On 13/03/2011 21:56, "Greg" wrote:
>
>>
>>Hi All - Per
I would second this request.
73 Stephen G4SJP
On 13/03/2011 21:56, "Greg" wrote:
>
>Hi All - Perhaps this was mentioned before and I missed it.but I would
>like
>to see a marker that would act as a marker when using XIT. When a DX
>station is "working up", for example, I would like to see the
n...@cableone.net wrote:
>
> Hi All - Perhaps this was mentioned before and I missed it.but I would
> like
> to see a marker that would act as a marker when using XIT.
>
If you enable the SPLIT function, VFO B will control your TX frequency and
the P3 has a purple cursor that shows where VFO
Hi All - Perhaps this was mentioned before and I missed it.but I would like
to see a marker that would act as a marker when using XIT. When a DX
station is "working up", for example, I would like to see the pile-up and
place my transmit frequency based on what I see on the P3. If I have good
pro
It isn't really a gain issue -- it's an issue between peak signal levels and
average levels.
Depending on signals, noise and band conditions, that delta could also be quite
variable.
Grant/NQ5T
On Jan 27, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Jim Brown wrote:
> I'm finding it quite useful to switch between peak
I'm finding it quite useful to switch between peak hold mode and
averaging mode, but the gain setting for the two modes differ by at
least 10 dB. The gain setting also varies widely from one antenna to
another, and from one band to another.
I'd like a function that allows me to store a gain OFF
Any comment from the P3 developers on this request please.
Trevor G0KTN
Original Message dated 29 December 2010
The following is a re-post of a request back in August which may have got
missed in the noise.
Did it make its way to the to do list ?
22 August 2010
Would it be
I would vote 100 % for that
Bob K3DJC
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 19:34 + (GMT Standard Time) tsmith...@cix.co.uk
(Trevor Smithers) writes:
> The following is a re-post of a request back in August which may have
> got missed in the noise.
> Did it make its way to the to do list ?
>
> 22 August
The following is a re-post of a request back in August which may have got
missed in the noise.
Did it make its way to the to do list ?
22 August 2010
Would it be possible to include an option under Span to display the actual
frequency of
the upper and lower offsets rather than -30 +30 or whate
I tried with my radio and don't notice this. I use main for now as my 2nd
ant has bit the dirt.
Bill
K9YEQ
-Original Message-
Alan,
A feature request for the P3 ... please adjust the Ref level internally to
accommodate the 6 dB level shift when the K3 sub-receiver is turned on/off
if i
Joe Subich, W4TV-4 wrote:
>
>
> A feature request for the P3 ... please adjust the Ref level
> internally to accommodate the 6 dB level shift when the K3
> sub-receiver is turned on/off if it is using the "Main" antenna.
>
>
I second the request!
-
73, Stan - KR7C
--
View this message
Alan,
A feature request for the P3 ... please adjust the Ref level
internally to accommodate the 6 dB level shift when the K3
sub-receiver is turned on/off if it is using the "Main" antenna.
It's quite annoying to have the baseline drop out the bottom of
the display when turning on the sub RX ..
This is also on the list to be implemented... Stay tuned...
~Brett (N7MG)
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 11:42 +0100 (BST), Trevor Smithers wrote:
>
>>Would it be possible to include an option under Span to display the actual
>>frequency of the upper and
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 11:42 +0100 (BST), Trevor Smithers wrote:
>Would it be possible to include an option under Span to display the actual
>frequency of the upper and lower offsets rather than -30 +30 or whatever
>has been set.
This is also on my wish list.
Another wish that might be tougher -
Alan and others,
Thanks for the quick input and suggestions. Alan, I've played with the QSY
function quite a few times since reading your reply. And it seems your software
is working properly. I haven't had a problem when tapping the knob firmly to
QSY. Thanks for adding that into 032. I loade
I've also wished for this feature to be in place... I have a feeling
its only a matter on that one though.
~Brett (N7MG)
On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 11:42 +0100, Trevor Smithers wrote:
> Would it be possible to include an option under Span to display the actual
> frequency of
> the upper and lower o
Would it be possible to include an option under Span to display the actual
frequency of
the upper and lower offsets rather than -30 +30 or whatever has been set.
So, if you had a CF of 7.038.6 the P3 screen would show 7.008.6 - 7.038.6 -
7.068.6
73
Trevor G0KTN
__
I am using latest beta firmware 0.31 on my new P3. I notice that when the
peak hold function is enabled, it disables spectrum averaging (if it was
enabled). Would it be possible to have peak hold available while using
display averaging?
Bruce, N1RX
K3 559, P3 97
_
83 matches
Mail list logo
