It will be quiet on receive and quiet on transmit, however much power
you put into it, until it melts, that is. I'd love to know where he
gets his efficiency figures - perhaps you can ask him. Putting steel
washers at each aluminium joint turned me off completely along with the
dinky receivin
:30:25 +
> From: d.cut...@ntlworld.com
> To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Portable Antennas (mag loop)
>
> It will be quiet on receive and quiet on transmit, however much power
> you put into it, until it melts, that is. I'd love to know wher
I bookmarked the site - thank you. However, I didn't get very far the first
time when I saw the comment "must be 1/2 wavelength above the ground..."
Still would like to go back and review the entire article.
Brings back a humorous dialog from years ago. One ham expressed the desire
to build a
I agree about the statement re height above ground which needed
qualifiying a little particularly as they then made measurements
somewhat less than that. The main thrust is about losses and the more
removed from ground and nearby objects the less the loss due to the very
high intensity of the
I have a small magnetic loop that's used strictly for receiving. It's a
Pixel loop with a preamp (from the same company) and I was astounded at how
well it works. I located it about 10 feet up on a rotor, about 50 feet away
from the house. It is incredibly broadbanded. While it doesn't quite hear
w
It was presented at a QRP conference, after all (and I'm more of a QRO
proponent) so I imagine the dinky capacitor didn't worry them too much.
My MFJ loop is working pretty darn well so far. I'm sure I'll have to
take it down and fix it eventually, but I have 54 countries worked this
year since I
6 matches
Mail list logo