Re: [Elecraft] RX Test (long)

2010-01-09 Thread David Christ
As I recall it was RCA at the dawn of HI-FI who did a test using a live orchestra and a physical passband filter to garner listener response. The audience did not know whether the filter was in or not The results were that people found the orchestra without the filter sounded unnatural. Thei

Re: [Elecraft] RX Test (long)

2010-01-09 Thread Guy Olinger K2AV
I agree. These artificacts have "sidebands" that increase and decrease with content in the normal passband, but their separation and frequency span is as if the frequency content (not the amplitude) of the normal passband were divided by 2 or 4. They are way down, and do not exceed the amplitude

Re: [Elecraft] RX Test (long)

2010-01-09 Thread Larry - K2GN
; > That is my observation and report, and MHO. Happy New Year to all. > > Milt, N5IA > > - Original Message - > From: "David Cutter" > To: "Julian, G4ILO" ; > Sent: Saturday, January 09, 2010 3:30 AM > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] RX Test (long

Re: [Elecraft] RX Test (long)

2010-01-09 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV
0 5:11 AM > To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] RX Test (long) > > > > > > Joe Subich, W4TV-4 wrote: > > > > > > Here is the genesis of the complaint that the K3 is more > > fatiguing than other receivers. The out of band noise >

Re: [Elecraft] RX Test (long)

2010-01-09 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV
..@subich.com > Cc: Elecraft Reflector > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] RX Test (long) > > > So what you are saying is the K3 is too quiet for its own > good, and that's what makes it so noisy! > > > > - Original Message > From: "Joe Subich, W4TV&quo

Re: [Elecraft] RX Test (long)

2010-01-09 Thread Guy Olinger K2AV
gt;> So what you are saying is the K3 is too quiet for its own good, and that's >> what makes it so noisy! >> >> >> >> - Original Message >> From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" >> To: d...@w3fpr.com; Al Lorona >> Cc: Elecraft Reflector >

Re: [Elecraft] RX Test (long)

2010-01-09 Thread Milt, N5IA
is not detrimental; in fact I can say that it is advantageous to ME. That is my observation and report, and MHO. Happy New Year to all. Milt, N5IA - Original Message - From: "David Cutter" To: "Julian, G4ILO" ; Sent: Saturday, January 09, 2010 3:30 AM Subjec

Re: [Elecraft] RX Test (long)

2010-01-09 Thread R. Kevin Stover
that's > what makes it so noisy! > > > > - Original Message > From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" > To: d...@w3fpr.com; Al Lorona > Cc: Elecraft Reflector > Sent: Fri, January 8, 2010 8:46:21 PM > Subject: RE: [Elecraft] RX Test (long) > > > > However, the s

Re: [Elecraft] RX Test (long)

2010-01-09 Thread Barry N1EU
Sorry, I don't buy the theory that the low-level stopband artifacts are responsible for the perception of the K3 being "noisy". To my ears and tests I've conducted multiple times, the artifacts are audibly masked in listening, even without the LPF. On spectrum analysis, I see artifacts in desc

Re: [Elecraft] RX Test (long)

2010-01-09 Thread David Cutter
If the K3 is being used by a contest group or dxpedition, for instance, you will have a wider range of hearing sensitivities and these activities force us to concentrate a lot more and use a radio for long periods. On this basis, fatigue due to these artefacts should be eliminated for the benef

Re: [Elecraft] RX Test (long)

2010-01-09 Thread Julian, G4ILO
Joe Subich, W4TV-4 wrote: > > > Here is the genesis of the complaint that the K3 is more > fatiguing than other receivers. The out of band noise > (noise above 5 KHz) in the K3 is, as you say, at least 60 dB > below the peak audio level (actually, I measure it at more > than 90dB down abo

Re: [Elecraft] RX Test (long)

2010-01-08 Thread Al Lorona
So what you are saying is the K3 is too quiet for its own good, and that's what makes it so noisy! - Original Message From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" To: d...@w3fpr.com; Al Lorona Cc: Elecraft Reflector Sent: Fri, January 8, 2010 8:46:21 PM Subject: RE: [Elecraft

Re: [Elecraft] RX Test (long)

2010-01-08 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV
after documentation) I will not speculate as to the source. 73, ... Joe, W4TV > -Original Message- > From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net > [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Don Wilhelm > Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 9:06 PM > To: A

Re: [Elecraft] RX Test (long)

2010-01-08 Thread David Gilbert
Why would you not want to look at the noise footprints with a spectrum analyzer? Your ear may tell you that there is something there that you don't like, but the spectrum analyzer will tell you what it is. If you are making audio files, send me a copy and I'll take a look at them for you and

Re: [Elecraft] RX Test (long)

2010-01-08 Thread Joe Planisky
I've also considered that theory. It would be interesting (and easy with an external audio mixer) to add a little pink noise to the audio output to see if that "mellows" the sound a bit. 73 -- Joe KB8AP On Jan 8, 2010, at 6:05 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote: > So my supposition is that we are not a

Re: [Elecraft] RX Test (long)

2010-01-08 Thread Don Wilhelm
I might add - perception is 99% of reality. I write of theoretical terms, but how the human ear/brain combination perceives things of this nature is indeed a subject for reflection and discussion. I expect that there will be many on both 'sides of the fence'. 73, Don W3FPR Al, From the test

Re: [Elecraft] RX Test (long)

2010-01-08 Thread Don Wilhelm
Al, From the tests I have done, I discovered that the K3 has a flat passband and very sharp filter skirts - in fact, very close to the "ideal" filter sought by many in past years. Other receivers tested (K2, Yaesu FT-900, FT-817) showed that their passband was not flat, but tapered smoothly

[Elecraft] RX Test (long)

2010-01-08 Thread Al Lorona
Hi, Everybody, What great comments I got from you in private e-mail messages. It's highly interesting getting your perspectives on receivers and listening. Due to day job and family I can't respond to every observation and objection but in particular Doug KR2Q-- who has some of the best ears in