onday, May 07, 2007 4:43 PM
To: Dan Barker
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] re: Improvements for the KX1
On Sunday 06 May 2007 08:44:33 you wrote:
> Adobe is your friend.
>
> I did a search for c181, and found the I.F.OUT you mention.
>
> Searching for I.F.OUT, I find it goes through J
] Behalf Of Ian Stirling
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2007 11:01 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] re: Improvements for the KX1
On Saturday 05 May 2007 22:24:11 Joseph Trombino Jr wrote:
> Correct IanI didn't count the last two xtals since I believe these two
> xtals ar
On Saturday 05 May 2007 22:24:11 Joseph Trombino Jr wrote:
> Correct IanI didn't count the last two xtals since I believe these two
> xtals are used more for removing I.F. noise than for providing
> selectivityat least this is what has been mentioned in other receiver
> articles I have
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Stirling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2007 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] re: Improvements for the KX1
On Saturday 05 May 2007 20:44:39 Joseph Trombino Jr wrote:
I'd really like to see another xtal or two
On Saturday 05 May 2007 20:44:39 Joseph Trombino Jr wrote:
> I'd really like to see another xtal or two added to the KX1 I.F. filter3
> poles just doesn't get it...the 4 pole filter in the K1 and 5 pole filter in
> the K2 are noticeably better than the 3 pole filter in the KX1.
The K2 has
Joe,
If you can figure out how to put them inside that already crowded
enclosure (and still maintain it as a kit), then yes a 4 or 5 pole
filter would be nice - BUT ...
73,
Don W3FPR
Joseph Trombino Jr wrote:
I'd really like to see another xtal or two added to the KX1 I.F.
filter3 poles
I'd really like to see another xtal or two added to the KX1 I.F. filter3
poles just doesn't get it...the 4 pole filter in the K1 and 5 pole filter in
the K2 are noticeably better than the 3 pole filter in the KX1.
73, Joe W2KJ
_
7 matches
Mail list logo