RE: [Elecraft] re: Improvements for the KX1

2007-05-07 Thread Dan Barker
, May 07, 2007 4:43 PM To: Dan Barker Subject: Re: [Elecraft] re: Improvements for the KX1 On Sunday 06 May 2007 08:44:33 you wrote: Adobe is your friend. I did a search for c181, and found the I.F.OUT you mention. Searching for I.F.OUT, I find it goes through J6/P6 to the Control board

RE: [Elecraft] re: Improvements for the KX1

2007-05-06 Thread Dan Barker
] Behalf Of Ian Stirling Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2007 11:01 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] re: Improvements for the KX1 On Saturday 05 May 2007 22:24:11 Joseph Trombino Jr wrote: Correct IanI didn't count the last two xtals since I believe these two xtals are used more

Re: [Elecraft] re: Improvements for the KX1

2007-05-05 Thread Don Wilhelm
Joe, If you can figure out how to put them inside that already crowded enclosure (and still maintain it as a kit), then yes a 4 or 5 pole filter would be nice - BUT ... 73, Don W3FPR Joseph Trombino Jr wrote: I'd really like to see another xtal or two added to the KX1 I.F. filter3

Re: [Elecraft] re: Improvements for the KX1

2007-05-05 Thread Ian Stirling
On Saturday 05 May 2007 20:44:39 Joseph Trombino Jr wrote: I'd really like to see another xtal or two added to the KX1 I.F. filter3 poles just doesn't get it...the 4 pole filter in the K1 and 5 pole filter in the K2 are noticeably better than the 3 pole filter in the KX1. The K2 has

Re: [Elecraft] re: Improvements for the KX1

2007-05-05 Thread Joseph Trombino Jr
- Original Message - From: Ian Stirling [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2007 10:13 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] re: Improvements for the KX1 On Saturday 05 May 2007 20:44:39 Joseph Trombino Jr wrote: I'd really like to see another xtal or two

Re: [Elecraft] re: Improvements for the KX1

2007-05-05 Thread Ian Stirling
On Saturday 05 May 2007 22:24:11 Joseph Trombino Jr wrote: Correct IanI didn't count the last two xtals since I believe these two xtals are used more for removing I.F. noise than for providing selectivityat least this is what has been mentioned in other receiver articles I have