Is there an ability for the K3 to display information on the P3 screen?
Such that it may be used as a larger output for RTTY/CW/PSK decoded
information. This way one can not only see more text but also use
decode while seeing both VFO freqs.
~Brett (KC7OTG)
On Sat, 2009-08-15 at 19:23 -0700,
Not sure but I'd bet (and hope) that the panadapter simply comes with an
RCA jack for its power. That way that it can just be plugged into the
DC out on the back of the rig.
~Brett
On Sat, 2009-08-15 at 22:29 -0400, inventor_sixty_one wrote:
Looks from the picture that the sheet metal has
understand where to set the values. I'm asking how to empirically
determine the value to use?
David Wilburn
NM4M
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Brett Howard br...@livecomputers.com
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 19:19:02
To: dave.wilb...@verizon.net
Cc
One last question that I'm more than willing to keep quiet but its been
on my mind wondering as I've been in a platform defining feasibility
tick at work lately...
Can I ask what processor you've selected? ARM based?
__
Elecraft
Let me see if I can help...
A panadapter is a lot like a piece of professional equipment called a
spectrum analyzer. If you are so inclined you can read about spectrum
analyzers too but what it gives you is a plot of amplitude vs frequency.
Most often in a panadapter the center frequency is
Check that you're not causing a false louder point with your RXEQ
settings?
~Brett (KC7OTG)
On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 13:22 -0700, wa6riv wrote:
Hell all,
When working with CWT if find the signal is fuller and louder when its not
centered under the mark. What can I do to center the signal and
Made me go look again as well.
with 50uV injected into the back I got an AFV of 1773. I first centered
the signal in CW and then changed to SSB. I have the auto offset
feature turned on so my rig was still centered and I know the frequency
of the tone this way. This allows me to use my pitch
I just grabbed a signal generator from work and brought it home...
Turned on the preamp and at about .320mV rms I got a HI SIG warning and
poof the preamp was disabled.
Then turned the signal up further yet. I didn't note the point at which
it turned off exactly but it was just over 2Vrms.
Makes sense...
Just found that on the FAQ page too...
Thanks much. Feels good knowing that there is at minimum an extra 10dB
of protection there!
Gotta love it!
~Brett(KC7OTG)
On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 17:51 -0600, Bob Cunnings wrote:
-10 dB according to the K3 RF board schematic, page 4 of 4.
I'd rather see a menu setting in menu probably even rather than config
that allows one to set the focus BW and then use the width knob to set
the width of the wider skirts. I think that also being able to set the
depth of the step between the two filters would also be really nice.
~Brett
I don't see how its that much more complex. Look at the AGC. Its quite
complex and very adaptable. However if you don't wish it to be complex
you can simply leave the settings at their defaults and move on with
your life.
I feel that the DUAL PB could operate in this same manner. Two menu
I've also posted it here as another mirror:
http://www.livecomputers.com/K3/FT_1000_APF.ppt
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 04:41 -0500, Bill W4ZV wrote:
Bill W4ZV wrote:
If you send all 6 APF plots directly to me I'll post them for all to see
(attachments must be sent directly since they will
Or perhaps a small area on the screen that provides the information that is
fleeting on the VFO B area. Such as power out, bandwidth, CW speed. Maybe
a small dashboard where users can define what values they'd like displayed
much like some of the older Garmin GPS's used to work.
This is where
All amateur radio products have provisions for a dummy any dummy that
feels like owning one only needs to pay for it! ;)
TIC
~Brett
-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Jim Hester
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009
Wonder if the graphics library (if you're using one) supports
transparencies. That could lead to some really cool filter BW displays.
Especially for the DUAL PB setups.
~Brett (KC7OTG)
-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On
No software is free!! Just ask any of the marketing guys at the company I
work for...
-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of telegrap...@att.net
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 1:46 PM
To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
The K3 was built on a RoHS process and technically you shouldn't mix the
processes (leaded solder with non leaded solder) that being said if
thats all you have then it will work. But the RoHS stuff can be had
fairly inexpensively...
~Brett (KC7OTG)
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 00:05 -0400, James Sarte
Respectfully I disagree. Any and all ideas are good to have here.
Especially now. What we don't need are any comments of talking down
about ideas. No matter how grandiose the ideas are welcomed and if you
read what Eric and Wayne say they also welcome them. What they don't
welcome is people
Being that I'm not around my rig I'm using the schematic as a reference
after searching the manual and not finding what I need.
The Key input looks like if its enabled its got +5V on the port that
needs to be able to be sunk to ground.
Am I reading that right? Has anyone seen this in another
What would you want to see? Would you want to be able to hook it to
electronics and see the waveform that you're probing? Would you want to see
a time vs amplitude (oscope) waveform of what is coming off your antenna?
Would you want a time vs amplitude of your TX signal?
These are all very
This capability is already in place. You need to proceed the name of the
memory with a * and they need to be in sequential memory locations in order
to pull it off but once you recall one you can then tune through the
memories with the VFO A knob. This is especially handy for the channelized
US
Seems to me that both the previous stuff and the new stuff has its
merits. I find that I use the new ones more than I did the old ones...
But it seems that with as many selections as we have (and many of them
seem very similar) why not have one or two of the numbers implement the
previous
Well use your DMM and measure the resistance of your power cord. Then
look at the current consumption of the K3. Then multiply these values
together. Good ole ohms law (v=i*r). If you end up getting about .16V
then there is your drop...
~Brett
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 22:38 -0700, Robin Diane
On my wishlist would be for an option to KEEP the fonts nice and small as
they are now. This would allow for a high resolution get more info on the
P3 screen mode... For those of us who still have acute vision I much prefer
to use very high resolution screens and take advantage of the
The Etymotic's are actually a really good price point for the quality.
You're not paying for a name like Klipsch who is literally just implementing
technology that Etymotic sells to them.
Ety doesn't make active noise cancelling products for audio heard.
Technically their not really doing
That is the test port which allows for working with the software and what
not... There has been talk of Elecraft designing some sort of keyboard that
may be able to be plugged in there but at the moment that has yet to
materialize. So for now just consider it a test port for the software
design
Yes I was referring to something very similar to this... If you end up ever
owning a pair of Etymotic ER-4's then you can get Westone to make you a set
of these to give you a custom fit:
http://www.westone.com/content/194.html
Also note that if you to go style No. 7 you can get a custom fit for
Wasn't there some sort of thought that the DVR could be used to do this
all built into the rig a long time ago?
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 17:06 -0700, Dick Dievendorff wrote:
I'm currently working on K3 Voice support to speak configuration menu
selections.
Dick, K6KR
-Original
You have to manually tune it throughout the band for it to learn the
settings to be recalled. You can either do this by tuning about every
20kc or you can download K3_EZ and then you can click a button and it
will automatically do the tuning for you. It just tunes qsy's tunes
qsy's again until
If sensitivity isn't specified often impedance is and the lower the
impedances usually result in higher efficiencies.
~Brett (KC7OTG)
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 22:27 -0700, Erik N Basilier wrote:
Thanks all for the suggestions!
Not having fallen yet for the fashionable pocket music players, I
This is a real application for blackberry smart phones...
Just thought the guys here would appreciate this one!
~Brett (KC7OTG)
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help:
: Brett Howard br...@livecomputers.com
To: Erik N Basilier ebasil...@cox.net
Cc: David Woolley (E.L) for...@david-woolley.me.uk;
elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 10:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX1 headphones
If sensitivity isn't specified often impedance
Have you configured your sub rx to have a noise blanker? I think you
have to go into the menu for the KNB3 and then hit sub and turn that on.
Then I'm not sure if you have to also use BSET to enable it or not but
this is at least a thought of something to check.
~Brett
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at
You know you can use the RIT knob as a fast band move knob with a simple
menu setting so that it works like the M.CH knob does on the Kenwoods.
~Brett
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 19:53 -0400, Luis V. Romero wrote:
No rocks need to be hidden under.
As a former TS850 owner and a current TS570
I know that the refresh rate is planned to be going faster here soon but
is there any chance of a simple video so that we may see it in its
active state?
~Brett
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 17:27 -0700, Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft wrote:
Believe me, the usable spectral display is much larger
For me the nervous part was injecting enough signal into the RX port to
activate the new feature! Not every day you dump a full watt into the
rig.
~Brett
On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 01:35 -0400, James Sarte wrote:
Thanks to all who gave me suggestions on soldering.
Was able to perform the
Personally I'd greatly more appreciate 8 PF's which can easily be
labeled by the LCD. I'd prefer even more the ability to have the power
button as yet another PF as I'll probably have the P3 power up upon
power applied and then simply plug it into the +12V out on the K3.
I honestly have gotten
I'd greatly prefer that the knob remains as is and I often call off on
weird frequencies just to try and keep ham radio a little more like ham
radio and a little less like CB.
~Brett (KC7OTG)
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 19:49 -0700, Wes Stewart wrote:
--- On Fri, 8/21/09, Brett Howard br
See and personally I'm quite loathed to the idea of owning a radio thats
done. I suppose my K1 is done and I still love that little rig but
thats a completely different style of rig and by no means my primary
radio. But like I said, I'll be disappointed the day the K3 is
considered done. That
How about a green button that resets everything back to defaults if you
get a bunch of options set that you want to clear quickly or to clear
things up if it gets into a strange state... ;)
Hopefully there are enough people who have used Agilent's spectrum
analyzers to get the joke...
Even
I use M1-M4 for doing some of this I setup M1 for the CW portion of
the band. I setup VFOA to the bottom of the band setup VFOB to the top
and then setup the mode and everything. Then I do the same for SSB on
M2. This not only gives me a quick way to go to the two band segments
but it also
That has already been stated that it will work that way...
On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 11:51 -0500, Michael B wrote:
How about being able to set the Programmable Function Buttons to change to
what ever band you like, but not making that permanent for those of us that
have other uses in mind.
On
The filtering should be done before the audio gets to the headphones.
A low end pair of headphones only acts to cover up flaws in receiver
design. A good broadband pair of uncolored headphones should be good
for reproducing audio as it was intended to be done so. While some
audio reproduction
I agree that this would be nice... Such that if you overwrite a memory
on accident then pressing CLR would revert the memory back to its
original state. I mentioned this before and I think Wayne mentioned it
as one of those things he'd like to get done some day.
~Brett
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at
http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/08/22/2340202/Sunspots-May-Be-Different-During-This-Solar-Minimum?from=rss
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post:
I wasn't hearing the noise at all and was maybe barely hearing the
noise w/ no antenna connected. I don't think I'd have noticed it unless
someone told me to look though...
There will be no unintended results as long as you carry out the mod as
intended.
Good luck! I've installed (and
I've worked as a design engineer in the audio industry for quite a
while... Rather than provide a list I'll just agree to disagree.
Personally I see communications specific headphones as a product
designed to separate people from their money and in that task they are
quite effective.
~BTH
On
Actually I believe that the signals will be plenty stable if you place
the hardware mod but don't change the frequency. However speeding
things up (using the SPI2 setting) w/o proper termination is going to
cause problems.
I think the reason for the speeding up of the clock was to put the
I've talked with Wayne on this mod and Eric's statement is the one to go
with. I believe that Ron simply made a typo and meant to say if you do
not add the resistors and diodes and you do change the timing that it
may become unstable.
~Brett
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 18:23 -0700, Joe Planisky
A fairly decent pair of cans that can be had for a quite inexpensive
price is the Sennheiser HD 201. For slightly more the HD205 will
produce a set of cans with better low frequency response. The 205
The HD201's are rated at 108dB/V where as the HD205 is 112. However the
impedance of the
This is one reason why I like the IEM's (in ear monitors) which seal
into your ear and provide excellent outside noise attenuation. I
consider noise cancellation nothing more than introduction of
distortion.
~Brett (KC7OTG)
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 17:40 -0700, Wes Stewart wrote:
Actually I do
Hrm. Seems odd. My understanding was that they were there to reduce
bounce on the clock edges and to lessen the amplitude to about 3V when
talking to those devices.
Logic tells me that it should be ok at both speeds with the termination
in place but your experience demonstrates otherwise.
That would make sense... Its the 13th harmonic of 4Mhz.
~Brett
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 22:18 -0400, James Sarte wrote:
Well, got around to installing the resistor/diode kit today, and for the
most part was uneventful. I managed to slightly melt/warp the edge of the
plastic RJ-45 jack at the
Agreed its VERY tough to find a set of headphones that meets the K3
requirements.
This last field day I'd not yet changed my caps out and so I brought
along a headphone amplifier that had an input impedance of 18Kohms and
used that to drive my headphones.
For another point of reference the
haha wow I just did the doubles rather than doing all off the harmonics.
Ok its time to go and get some sleep. The 3 hours I got last night were
not enough.
~Brett
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 17:09 -0700, Brett Howard wrote:
Actually I believe that the signals will be plenty stable if you place
Well just mucked around on the bands for a bit (about 40 minutes or so)
with the hardware mods in place and switched it back to SPI1 and I
wasn't able to get anything to behave strangely...
However in trying to recall the change from memory I did find that
pressing 8 while in VCO MD changes what
I believed Eric's statement to be true however Ron has experienced
problems with his radio performing unsolicited QSY's after her performed
the mod but forgot to change the menu setting.
I have the mod in my radio and just tried to get something to happen w/
my radio set back to SPI1. I tried
I've not had a chance to spend a lot of time with the new firmware but
here are my initial impressions.
The NR seems to be really great in CW (but I liked it a lot in 3.25 as
well). It seems to fade into the new settings a bit quicker and not
need to be turned off and back on again. Although I
.
Have to revert to 3.25 if you want LF audio.
Steve
N4LQ
n...@carolina.rr.com
- Original Message -
From: Brett Howard br...@livecomputers.com
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 9:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Future Factory Hardware Updates;+ New beta f
I'd felt that the SSB NR was a bit lacking in this latest version but
found that the echo was very difficult to copy through and when
listening to stronger stations however like I said I didn't get a
change to spend a lot of time behind it...
I just made a contact to Tasmania (he barely heard me
Agreed setting the BW a bit wider than needed helps the filter out it
seems but even at very narrow widths it does help.
I was just operating in CW a lil bit ago and a station ended its QSO dit
dit and then the rig went silent. I turned up the volume a bit and man
there was nothing... Oh yea
Agreed! Mine were setup for CW (and they were setup for the
excitement that was actually having low frequency in 3.24!!!) Can't
wait for that to come back!
~Brett
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:13 AM, rfenab...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I tried again with RX Eq set flat and the NR functions as I
I like to have the lower response when doing cw. Yes my ears work that
low and yes the outboard amplifier and speakers I'm using can respond
that low.
~Brett
On 8/26/09, Hector Padron ad4c2...@yahoo.com wrote:
Ian,I am with you,it works outstanding now,I don't even lose the audio as
other
Heck if what you want is per mode NR then allow the rig to use its
current state to select an NR set. If the rig is in SSB you get one NR
and if you're in CW then you get the other. That way there is no need
for a selection other than the mode that everyone is already used to
selecting.
On
Make sure and try it with AFX on and off.
On 8/26/09, Paul - WW2PT ww...@arrl.net wrote:
I found the NR in v3.25 to be excellent to my ears and a big improvement to
previous versions, but I'm having a lot of trouble finding a NR setting with
v3.27 that I'm comfortable with -- everything
Elecraft says they are planning on bringing that low end audio back as
a feature rather than as a bug. I'm very glad it was there as a bug
and hope that this response of people liking it helps to improve its
position on the priority queue.
BTH.
On 8/26/09, Laurent F6DEX f6...@yahoo.fr wrote:
I
Another thing that I've heard asked for a few times that I'd
appreciate is the ability to hear the signal while adjusting pitch
rather than a solid tone. I know that if the user had no signal tuned
that they be adjusting somewhat blind. However the band noise will
still have a different sound
Understood I was thinking it would be cool to hear how copy changed if
you adjusted pitch after you had zero beat found.
BTH
On 8/26/09, Lyle Johnson k...@wavecable.com wrote:
Another thing that I've heard asked for a few times that I'd
appreciate is the ability to hear the signal while
Ah ok then. I do know that with 3.25 and the shift ctrl set to .1 you
get some really nice LF response.
On 8/26/09, Bill W4ZV btipp...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
Brett Howard wrote:
As far as the shift you're mentioning are you talking about the fact
that the FC star moves to the freq that you
Man that will be a lot of settings but after reading all the posts I'd
had exactly the same idea but just didn't post it. Having a little
down time here after kayaking back from the neighbors on the other
side of the bay for lunch. Figured I'd look in and catch up. I'm
anxiously awaiting the
Where I think it should be reported is in the kxxx area of the menu.
So in the area where you turn on the krx3 and knb3 and what not you
could have a non editable entry for kesp3 or some other creative part
number.
On 8/30/09, Brian Alsop als...@nc.rr.com wrote:
I wonder since this is a software
was listening on a nearby
frequency with the preamp ON. With a couple of dits, the preamp turned
OFF and with a continuous carrier, it turned the attenuator ON. No
measurements made.
73,
Ken K3IU
~~`
Brett Howard wrote:
Where I think it should be reported
to their receiver.
On 8/30/09, R. Kevin Stover rksto...@mchsi.com wrote:
If mod installers don't have at least a cheap DMM to do testing with,
they have no business anywhere near the K3 RF board with a soldering
iron. Why continually add things to the menu?
Brett Howard wrote:
It would give mod installers
Amateur N5GE n...@n5ge.com wrote:
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:17:38 -0700, Brett Howard
br...@livecomputers.com wrote:
In line:
Dmm doesn't provide assurance that you have the right points. I
personally wanted assurance and so I used my k1 a dummy load and my
dmm to test.
That's a good way to test
Also many browsers will flush the cache and refresh if you hold shift
while clicking refresh.
I think most of these problems stem from more and more ISPs starting
to use transparent caching proxy servers so they can over sell their
bandwidth to even higher points. There isn't a whole lot that
Heck pissing off a guy trying to run QRM over a net could be quite
fun... Heck this could result in making the net even MORE popular! ;)
~Brett
On Sun, 2009-08-30 at 20:28 -0600, Dale Putnam wrote:
I like that Vic,... besides.. operation like that is kinda like in a
contest.. and most of us
Is this just a bug fix or are we going to possibly be seeing the
extended bass response and additional NR from long ago all wrapped up?
~Brett (KC7OTG)
On Sun, 2009-08-30 at 22:08 -0700, Eric Swartz -WA6HHQ, Elecraft wrote:
Lyle just figured this out and corrected a typo in the dsp code. We
I've messed with quite a few of these adapters and one of the most rock
solid ones I've used are the chipsets from FTDI. You can read about their
stuff at http://www.ftdichip.com. I have no affiliation with the company
other than that I've designed a few of their parts into systems that I've
I had a thought about your comments on the preamp. Being that many
simply leave it on (personally I don't think I've ever used mine) but
anyway wouldn't the hardware AGC being at max gain be another indicator
that it may be useful to use? Perhaps the PRE icon could flash if use
of that feature
The NR is quite great... There are lots of choices to choose from. I
was quite impressed with it. Found some choices in the top 16 that I
really liked for SSB. Found some in the bottom 16 that I loved for CW.
Color me happy. Granted its a lot of choices but I dig choice.
The low frequency
I remember seeing some improvements for the K1 NB a while back and was
interested in trying to improve mine a bit as its not quite enough to
kill the noise near the house here. My TS-450 gets it in a heartbeat as
does my K3 but the K1 leaves a lot of it still there...
Anyone remember where this
Well I did it... Finally loaded 3.25 back into my K3... The ton of
NR settings are kinda cool in the latest but man the low frequency
response actually being there in 3.25 made all of the later versions
just sound terrible. The 3.25 combined with the low pass filter just
feels right. Can't
Did you get a reduction in RX sensitivity? What happens if you try to do a
tune when set to 5.0 watts?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philip Leonard WVØT
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 11:11 AM
To: Elecraft Reflector
Subject: Re:
Yes its 50Hz.
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 20:55 -0400, Doug Joyce wrote:
To the Group:
Having ordered a K3 at Dayton, I've been following the recent discussion on
DSP vs. Roofing Filter for bandpass width determination with great interest.
In that regard, I have a quick question - what is the
Congrats! Have fun putting her together!
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 21:28 -0400, Jim Miller wrote:
Inventory done with all sub assys present.
Almost missed the mixer since it was so tiny.
Didn't count all the screws in the parts bags.
Life is good.
K2 is working the QRP foxhunt now.
From what I understand its an FCC/legal type of thing...
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 22:21 -0500, Dave Quick - KØEKL wrote:
When I try to scan between two frequencies on 6m I get the message Scanning
not allowed on this band.
I'm using the procedure described on page 37 of my manual. Am I
I agree... But when I asked for the ability to erase memories Wayne
told me he didn't understand why I would want that ability when I could
just over write the memory location with something else. But when he
made it so a lot of people started taking a lot more liberties with
memories and really
I agree that the 50Hz jumps do feel like much bigger schwacks in the
lower bandwidths but I don't feel them un-reasonably so... How narrow
do you wish things to get? 25Hz? 10Hz? 1Hz? Personally I don't know
what the right value is but I do think that 1Hz increments would be too
smooth. To the
What mode are you in... Try using the auto notch when you're in SSB
mode... The auto notch isn't there in CW mode because it can't really
tell the difference between a signal and a carrier with out making a lot
of assumptions that have high probability of being wrong...
On Thu, 2008-07-10 at
So reading about the NB the NAR/MED/WID is how long you blank for and
the 1-7 is the blanking level. Its mentioned that the higher the number
the more aggressive the blanking. So I'm assuming the higher the value
the lower the trigger point for a blanking event?
So then in the errata says that
I don't see to much need to change the scan rate really. It scans through
as quickly as it can (or slightly slower depending on where you have the
tuning rate set before asking it to scan). Then it stops on whatever it
finds. Granted the dwell time being settable would be nice but I find that
If you're storing stuff on an in-house server then you are your own email
provider and if you are having problems with spam blocking software causing
you problems then the fault lies close by... (you can at least reach the
party to be blamed with a baseball bat). Most companies with more than 10
I find that using the shift control and sending things south a tad can
help with this problem Even if you don't have a 1.8K filter try that
with just a DSP filter width of 1.8 and use the shift and turn it
downward until it sounds good. Then you can tune around the band like
that and when they
Personally I really liked the 1.8K filter in my rig during FD. The
bands were packed and they'd allow you to squeeze into the tightest of
places and take a run freq that you know the guy above and below you is
being bugged by people calling you back but you can pick them out of the
muck like
I should state that I greatly appreciate the current height of the bail
it makes for a very comfortable operating position. *BUT* it should be
noted that (IMHO) the display doesn't look all that good when its up on
its bail w/ the default LCD viewing angle setting... The LCD viewing
angle
My K3 also arrived last Monday and they stated that mine had arrived and
that there were a few in the queue in front of it. When I called on
Friday they'd stated that mine was on the bench but hadn't gotten worked
on yet. They expect that it should ship out early this coming week. I
was told
Did you ever get a chance to measure the voltage at pins 6 and 8 on your
connection to the Reference board?
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 01:15 -0700, OE5CSP-Chris wrote:
Is the K3 capable of using an RF probe similar to the K2? Do you get an RF
probe with the K3 like you do with the K2? Can one
When I called UPS they actually told me that a signature would be
required and thankfully my wife offered to work from home and sign for
it being that I had to be in the office that day... Working on
schematic entry from home is a pain!
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 05:58 -0700, KB1PXD wrote:
My wife
It should also be noted that holding clr zero's the offset but adds the
offset to the current VFO freq.
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 23:04 -0400, Don Wilhelm wrote:
Bud,
It works just like the manual states. Tap CLR to zero the RIT/XIT
offset. Tapping it a second time restores the offset. - see
Either way you have the toggle feature as you can just use the RIT
button instead. Both ways work. I'm not partial to either. Its just
one of those things you get used to.
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 09:25 -0700, N2TK wrote:
Well, I actually like the toggle feature when trying to work DX split. The
301 - 400 of 916 matches
Mail list logo
