Warren Smith wrote:
I was contacted by a prestigious musical group to help them hold an election.
The election data and results (pending rechecking comments by you all)
in anonymized form, are here:
http://RangeVoting.org/June2011RealWorldRRVvotes.txt
Feel free to run your favorite
2011/6/25 Kristofer Munsterhjelm km_el...@lavabit.com
Warren Smith wrote:
I was contacted by a prestigious musical group to help them hold an
election.
The election data and results (pending rechecking comments by you all)
in anonymized form, are here:
If you have a loop like
for(i=1 to C)
if(x[i]best}{ best=x[i]; ibest=i; }
then you will find the maximum x[] but breaking ties always by choosing the
maximum index i.
However, you can pre-prepare a random permutation of {1,2,...,C} as follows
for(i=1 to C) p[i]=i;
for(i=C down
Jameson Quinn wrote:
2011/6/25 Kristofer Munsterhjelm km_el...@lavabit.com
mailto:km_el...@lavabit.com
So I quickly hacked together something to run it through my old
multiwinner code, but I'm getting unusual results. Could someone
check that they get what I'm getting?
{C101
2011/6/25 Kristofer Munsterhjelm km_el...@lavabit.com
Jameson Quinn wrote:
2011/6/25 Kristofer Munsterhjelm km_el...@lavabit.com mailto:
km_el...@lavabit.com
So I quickly hacked together something to run it through my old
multiwinner code, but I'm getting unusual results. Could
Jameson Quinn wrote:
Wait is that a global randomization, used across all votes? If it
is... or in fact, even if it isn't... I suggest you do what Warren
suggested, and run it several times, with different random seeds, to see
if the results are reasonably stable.
The way my program
2011/6/25 Kristofer Munsterhjelm km_el...@lavabit.com
Jameson Quinn wrote:
Wait is that a global randomization, used across all votes? If it
is... or in fact, even if it isn't... I suggest you do what Warren
suggested, and run it several times, with different random seeds, to see if
The musical group who wanted me to process their election, actually wanted, not
a list of 9 winners, but actually an ordering of all 16 candidates,
top 9 being the winners.
--
Warren D. Smith
http://RangeVoting.org -- add your endorsement (by clicking
endorse as 1st step)
and
Should the order be a proportional order or a best single winner order? I
guess both are possible although so far the assumption obviously was
proportional set or proportional order.
Juho
On 26.6.2011, at 1.21, Warren Smith wrote:
The musical group who wanted me to process their election,
http://RangeVoting.org/June2011RealWorldRRVvotes.txt
now updated some more and mentions JQ KM. Note there is a Condorcet cycle.
It seems peculiar if your 9 winners do not include C101.
On 6/25/11, Warren Smith warren@gmail.com wrote:
The musical group who wanted me to process
I added a line to print out the remaining candidates, in decreasing order of
remaining reweighted ballots, as soon as all seats were filled. (After first
finding that if I actually ran the leftover protocol, it only gave one
candidate, because after all the reweighting up to that point, all
I was contacted by a prestigious musical group to help them hold an election.
The election data and results (pending rechecking comments by you all)
in anonymized form, are here:
http://RangeVoting.org/June2011RealWorldRRVvotes.txt
Feel free to run your favorite alternative multiwinner
12 matches
Mail list logo
