Uwe Brauer writes:
> I'd like that, in certain files, subscripts are ignored.
>
> I know I could use ~ ~ as in
> ~dl_emacs_support.m~
>
> Or
>
> =dl_emacs_support.m=
>
> But could I deactivate font locking for these constructions locally?
You can set org-use-sub-superscripts locally in the
Sébastien Miquel writes:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>> Thanks for the clarification! Now, your patch makes much more sense. Can
>> you update the commit message explaining the above shortly and linking
>> to this thread?
>
> See attached.
Thanks!
Applied onto main via 9fb9a2bdf with amendments to
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Arthur Miller writes:
>
>> this example the mode map approach seems slightly more convenient. I don't
>> know,
>> in org-agenda-test, I haven't implemented all of org-agenda, restrictions,
>> prefixes and some other stuff, mostly because I don't really understand the
Arthur Miller writes:
> Anyway, I have been playing and testing a bit, and didn't want to prolong
> discussion untill I have something to show. So here is a small prototype. It
> is
> just a rough sketch of the idea.
Thanks!
I will not comment on Elisp part just yet. Let's first settle down
"Felix Freeman" writes:
> Today I stumbed upon the same bug.
>
> Sadly I have no idea how to fix it, but thought it would be nice to post
> about it here so the bug doesn't get lost in the sands of time.
I finally managed to get some working fix.
At least it kind of works on my system using
From: Tim Cross
A duplicate library-of-babel.org file was in the
worg/org-contrib/babel
directory. It was out-of-date, so I moved it to archive.
The 'real' library-of-babel.org file sits in the root /worg
directory.
---
{org-contrib/babel => archive}/library-of-babel.org | 0
1 file changed,
From: Tim Cross
- Add exmaple elispgantt test table and description
- Fix some old tblname and headers arguments
- Fix some missing quoting in exmaple blocks
- fix block indentation
- add missing name values
Still a bit of cleanup work required, but a start...
---
library-of-babel.org | 554
These patches just perform some basic cleanup of the library-of-
babel.org file. It also moves a duplicate library-of-babel.org file into
the archive directory. Note that I am working on a complete overhaul of
worg, which I will implement in a separate branch in my sourcehut clone
of the repo.
Bastien writes:
> If one day more Org contributors appear on a Worg page where they
> advertize their need for donations (and I encourage Org contributors
> to add such a page), I would have no problem with links to donations
> services that are not aligned with GNU standards.
I have been
Samuel Wales writes:
> sure.
>
> iiuc i think op wants 2 things:
>
> 1] graphical bullets. i.e. not the - + etc. that are in the org
> plain text as saved to disk.
> 2] each level of a list to have the same bullet style
>
>
> examples of 2]:
>
> a conforming list:
>
> - this is level 1.
"Fraga, Eric" writes:
> Dear Tim,
>
> On Friday, 17 Jun 2022 at 18:27, Tim Cross wrote:
>> "Fraga, Eric" writes:
>>> On Friday, 17 Jun 2022 at 13:34, Tim Cross wrote:
One of the more interesting code blocks is elispgantt, which can
generate a Gantt chart from data supplied in a
sure.
iiuc i think op wants 2 things:
1] graphical bullets. i.e. not the - + etc. that are in the org
plain text as saved to disk.
2] each level of a list to have the same bullet style
examples of 2]:
a conforming list:
- this is level 1. for this list, we always want level 1 to
use
Edouard Debry writes:
> As a matter of fact, you can, but I will check out the latex package you
> mentioned
>
> "Fraga, Eric" writes:
>
>> Check out the animate LaTeX package. I don't believe you can create
>> such the actual animation from tikz itself.
FYI, animate package can work, but it
As a matter of fact, you can, but I will check out the latex package you
mentioned
"Fraga, Eric" writes:
> Check out the animate LaTeX package. I don't believe you can create
> such the actual animation from tikz itself.
Thank you! That was exactly what I was looking for.
Sincerely,
Haakon
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> While arbitrary markup can indeed be introduced using our current link
> syntax, there is one important limitation of links:
>
> *** link description cannot contain other links ***
>
> If one seriously tries to extend Org syntax with custom markup elements,
> nested
Dear Tim,
On Friday, 17 Jun 2022 at 18:27, Tim Cross wrote:
> "Fraga, Eric" writes:
>> On Friday, 17 Jun 2022 at 13:34, Tim Cross wrote:
>>> One of the more interesting code blocks is elispgantt, which can
>>> generate a Gantt chart from data supplied in a table. It is based on
>>> code
Ok I understand, it's really nice (the rendering on your site too).
Thanks for your answer
Le ven. 17 juin 2022 à 16:05, Kaushal Modi a
écrit :
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 8:50 AM Cletip Cletip
> wrote:
>
> > Final question : why do you use description lists and not another ?
>
> I use
Ok clear thanks!
Le ven. 17 juin 2022 à 15:43, Fraga, Eric a écrit :
> On Friday, 17 Jun 2022 at 09:35, William Denton wrote:
> > When I have a list of things I want to briefly descibe!
>
> And where the leading bullet or number would simple add clutter.
> --
> : Eric S Fraga, with org
Simple and efficient, thanks for your answer!
Le ven. 17 juin 2022 à 15:36, William Denton a écrit :
> On 17 June 2022, Cletip Cletip wrote:
>
> > Final question : why do you use description lists and not another ?
>
> When I have a list of things I want to briefly descibe! That's all. It's
On Friday, 17 Jun 2022 at 13:48, DEBRY.Edouard wrote:
> Unfortunately not.
>
> If I remember well, this setting is for math environments, whether you
> want to preview them as png or svg, it does not work for src blocks.
Well, my src blocks work although I use imagemagick and then have the
Hi,
Cletip Cletip writes:
> - they are made implicitly to make a "key :: value" couple, which can
> be convenient
Leaving aside typographical considerations, what LaTeX calls, for
example, "description" (because Org is totally typographic agnostic), I
find this property that you mention very
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 8:50 AM Cletip Cletip wrote:
> Final question : why do you use description lists and not another ?
I use description lists *heavily*.
1. For description lists of course.. where the "description" part is a
bit verbose and plain lists don't look at that elegant
For
Check out the animate LaTeX package. I don't believe you can create
such the actual animation from tikz itself.
--
: Eric S Fraga, with org release_9.5.4-535-ged6f8d in Emacs 29.0.50
Unfortunately not.
If I remember well, this setting is for math environments, whether you
want to preview them as png or svg, it does not work for src blocks.
"Fraga, Eric" writes:
>
On Friday, 17 Jun 2022 at 09:35, William Denton wrote:
> When I have a list of things I want to briefly descibe!
And where the leading bullet or number would simple add clutter.
--
: Eric S Fraga, with org release_9.5.4-535-ged6f8d in Emacs 29.0.50
It is not quite true that it's just a way of formatting, there is a
semantic element to it as well where someone parsing your document
programmatically can now know that what you have is a list of terms paired
with their descriptions. In fact, when exporting to html you get a
description list
On 17 June 2022, Cletip Cletip wrote:
Final question : why do you use description lists and not another ?
When I have a list of things I want to briefly descibe! That's all. It's just
a way of formatting a list of things where there's a term (a word, a name, a
title) that has some
Have you tried adding the line:
#+options: tex:dvipng
to the file? (you may need to type C-c C-c on that line to refresh the
settings.) Would this solve your problem?
--
: Eric S Fraga, with org release_9.5.4-535-ged6f8d in Emacs 29.0.50
Hello,
I would like to create an animated gif for a latex src block.
Here to fix ideas such a block :
<>
#+header: :file test4.gif
#+header: :exports results
#+header: :results output silent graphics file
Hello,
I had a couple of small issues when trying to export latex src block to
images.
Here is to fix ideas a src block :
<=>
#+HEADER: :file test1.png
#+HEADER: :exports results
#+HEADER: :results output
Hello to all,
The question is the same as the object, but it can be more detailed with
this question: what are the differences between description lists and other
lists?
After many researches, I can't understand the fundamental difference.
I can see two advantages to using this type of list:
-
Ihor Radchenko writes:
Thanks for the clarification! Now, your patch makes much more sense. Can
you update the commit message explaining the above shortly and linking
to this thread?
See attached.
Thanks,
--
Sébastien Miquel
From 72742cab341f66525e0acb0b92de65fb6d24c27f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
Samuel Wales writes:
> i wonder if org could do the semantics in the text, while
> fontification could do the appearance only.
>
> org allows you to change the bullet style [real text bullets rather
> than fontification] upon demotion.
>
> thus, you can have it consistent that demoting + from
Haakon HR writes:
> I have tried a few approaches but I'm a bit stuck. My first approach was
> to use the variable `org-agenda-cmp-user-defined' and implement a
> comparison function based on the already existing ones like
> `org-cmp-alpha' or `org-cmp-effort'. However, I'm not able to extract
>
Hi all,
I'm trying to hack together a custom agenda view where I want to sort
the entries by a custom property, let's call it :CUSTOM:. So the entries
in question would look like this:
* TODO Buy cheese
:PROPERTIES
:CUSTOM: 2
:END:
I have tried a few approaches but I'm a bit stuck. My
"Fraga, Eric" writes:
> On Friday, 17 Jun 2022 at 13:34, Tim Cross wrote:
>> One of the more interesting code blocks is elispgantt, which can
>> generate a Gantt chart from data supplied in a table. It is based on
>> code originally submitted by Eric Fraga and modified by Tom Dye. .
>
> If you
On Friday, 17 Jun 2022 at 13:34, Tim Cross wrote:
> One of the more interesting code blocks is elispgantt, which can
> generate a Gantt chart from data supplied in a table. It is based on
> code originally submitted by Eric Fraga and modified by Tom Dye. .
If you give me the link, I will try to
I am forwarding yet another email from the emacs-devel thread to here.
This thread includes both emacs-devel and Org ML.
I will still keep emacs-devel in the loop because people from there can
provide a useful insight about texinfo capabilities.
Richard Stallman wrote:
> I don't know for certain
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Vestibulum convallis, lorem blockname_[<>]{text} a tempus semper, dui
> dui euismod elit, vitae placerat urna tortor vitae lacus.
This thread is possible relevant to the ongoing emacs-devel discussion
where RMS requested support/integration of Org and texinfo.
Richard
40 matches
Mail list logo
