Hello,
Feng Shu tuma...@gmail.com writes:
Not all the org-mode users are expert of lisp and not all of the org-mode
users are well in English, so finding the variable `org-latex-classes can
customize latex class and adding a lisp block to it may be not a easy
things for many users.
I
Feng Shu tuma...@gmail.com writes:
#+LATEX_CLASS: article
#+LATEX_CLASS_NAME: ctexart
I'm not sure this is the right approach. . . I can certainly see the
value of generating classes on the fly, though. But somehow the
proposed syntax just seems to counter-intuitive. I'm not sure how to
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
Feng Shu tuma...@gmail.com writes:
#+LATEX_CLASS: article
#+LATEX_CLASS_NAME: ctexart
I'm not sure this is the right approach. . . I can certainly see the
value of generating classes on the fly, though. But somehow the
proposed syntax just seems to
Nick Dokos ndo...@gmail.com writes:
as e.g. the INCLUDE command. Of course (*) is somewhat different from
how stuff like this is usually handled, cf. e.g. LATEX_CLASS_OPTIONS.
...but this sounds a bit more promising: maybe LATEX_CLASS_OPTIONS can
be eliminated in favor of LATEX_CLASS with
Nick Dokos ndo...@gmail.com writes:
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
Feng Shu tuma...@gmail.com writes:
#+LATEX_CLASS: article
#+LATEX_CLASS_NAME: ctexart
I'm not sure this is the right approach. . . I can certainly see the
value of generating classes on the fly, though. But somehow the
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
Feng Shu tuma...@gmail.com writes:
#+LATEX_CLASS: article
#+LATEX_CLASS_NAME: ctexart
I'm not sure this is the right approach. . . I can certainly see the
value of generating classes on the fly, though. But somehow the
proposed syntax just seems to
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 05:55:56PM +0800, Feng Shu wrote:
CLASS and class-name are confusing, I think LATEX_CLASS should rename
to LATEX_CLASS_FORMAT or LATEX_CLASS_TEMPLATE, but this will break
compatibility.
IMO compatibility is a big and important issue, and not to be taken
lightly.
--
Hello,
Feng Shu tuma...@gmail.com writes:
#+LATEX_CLASS: article
%%output:
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
...
--
#+LATEX_CLASS: article
#+LATEX_CLASS_NAME: ctexart
%%output:
\documentclass[11pt]{ctexart}
Thanks for your patch.
Though,
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes:
Hello,
Feng Shu tuma...@gmail.com writes:
#+LATEX_CLASS: article
%%output:
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
...
--
#+LATEX_CLASS: article
#+LATEX_CLASS_NAME: ctexart
%%output:
#+LATEX_CLASS: article
%%output:
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
...
--
#+LATEX_CLASS: article
#+LATEX_CLASS_NAME: ctexart
%%output:
\documentclass[11pt]{ctexart}
--
From 338ce85c306ae400ba8c62bfaecaf8973346faa0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Feng
Feng Shu tuma...@gmail.com writes:
#+LATEX_CLASS: article
%%output:
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
...
--
#+LATEX_CLASS: article
#+LATEX_CLASS_NAME: ctexart
%%output:
\documentclass[11pt]{ctexart}
Hi:
If possible, please merge this patch to
11 matches
Mail list logo