On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 08:44:03 +1030
Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk wrote:
Not with BBDB, either version. I have 760 contacts in BBDB.
That's good to hear. Thank you.
You can have any number of simple fields labelled whatever you
want. I am not sure if you can define new structured ones
Gour,
I see that you have posted on the bbdb mailing list so I suggest
we move this discussion there where you will find plenty of people
able to help! We're well OT with respect to org related
discussion now...
cheers,
eric
--
: Eric S Fraga, GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D
: in Emacs
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 08:34:58 +1030
Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk wrote:
I use bbdb3; never got to grips with org-contacts and I have too
many contacts in any case.
No performance issues?
bbdb3 provides a subtle improvement to bbdb2: better more logical key
bindings and less surprising
Hi Gour,
Eric S Fraga writes:
Gour g...@atmarama.net writes:
Do you use bbdb3 and what are important things it brings over
bbdb2?
Org will interpret the anniversary (e.g. birthdays, wedding
anniversary, other dates) field in bbdb entries to bring in
information into the agenda
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:04:28 +
Myles English mylesengl...@gmail.com wrote:
I used to use gnus but changed to mu4e. My gnus broke during the
change to emacs24 and I couldn't find the help out there to fix it.
Mu4e has good documentation and a very helpful developer. It was
very easy to
I am a confirmed gnus user. No other email system comes close to
doing what gnus can do. Given the large volume of email I get,
splitting and scoring are essential to survival! Integration with
bbdb is also obviously key for me.
Slightly offtopic, but I'm a Mutt user that's eyeballed Gnus
Russell Adams rlad...@adamsinfoserv.com writes:
I am a confirmed gnus user. No other email system comes close to
doing what gnus can do. Given the large volume of email I get,
splitting and scoring are essential to survival! Integration with
bbdb is also obviously key for me.
Slightly
Gour g...@atmarama.net writes:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 08:34:58 +1030 Eric S Fraga
e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk wrote:
I use bbdb3; never got to grips with org-contacts and I have
too many contacts in any case.
No performance issues?
Not with BBDB, either version. I have 760 contacts in BBDB.
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 08:34:58 +1030
Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk wrote:
I use bbdb3; never got to grips with org-contacts and I have too
many contacts in any case.
No performance issues?
bbdb3 provides a subtle improvement to bbdb2: better more logical key
bindings and less surprising
Gour g...@atmarama.net writes:
Do you use bbdb3 and what are important things it brings over
bbdb2?
I use bbdb3; never got to grips with org-contacts and I have too
many contacts in any case. bbdb3 provides a subtle improvement to
bbdb2: better more logical key bindings and less
Gour g...@atmarama.net writes:
But I certainly like the org-mode format much much much better than
bbdb(3). Which I'm still using, unfortunately.
Do you use bbdb3 and what are important things it brings over bbdb2?
I do, and not much. Slightly better highlighting and redefined set of
key
On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 08:08:15 -0800
Wes Hardaker wjhns...@hardakers.net wrote:
I do, and not much. Slightly better highlighting and redefined set
of key bindings and thoughts (IE, you need to re-learn stuff too
though).
Thank you.
I have tried at times to switch away from gnus. Every time
Gour g...@atmarama.net writes:
Based on this description it seems that org-contacts is more suitable
for the task than BBDB(3) offering ability to have custom format, easy
editing of contacts etc., but I do wonder about scalability considering
the following post
On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 09:16:41 -0800
Wes Hardaker wjhns...@hardakers.net wrote:
FYI, I tried (again) to use org-contacts a while back and still see
the same speed problems. It's great for small contacts, but not for
large.
:-(
I think what would be needed would be to read the file and store
14 matches
Mail list logo
