Re: [O] org-annotate/collaboration?

Hi Matt. > Does anyone use org-annotate actively? I'm wondering what your > workflow is, how you incorporate comments, etc. > I'm hoping to embark on a book project with a colleague. [...] Is the math "Homotopy Type Theory" book git solution too much for your colleague?

Re: [O] org-annotate/collaboration?

> Uwe Brauer writes: > I think I could easily convince people to use an online system, or one > that works in Markdown (which would be nice). The killer is the history > tracking: everyone's used to Track Changes, and it would take a real > revolution to dislodge

Re: [O] org-annotate/collaboration?

Uwe Brauer writes: >> Uwe Brauer writes: > >> I think collaborators who have even a tiny familiarity with >> technological tools make the whole process much, much easier. >> Unfortunately I'm working with technophobes, the sort of people who >

Re: [O] org-annotate/collaboration?

> Uwe Brauer writes: > I think collaborators who have even a tiny familiarity with > technological tools make the whole process much, much easier. > Unfortunately I'm working with technophobes, the sort of people who > call the browser "the internet", so I have

Re: [O] org-annotate/collaboration?

Uwe Brauer writes: "Eric" == Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> Matt Price writes: >>> Does anyone use org-annotate actively? I'm wondering what your >>> workflow is, how you incorporate comments, etc. > >> I wrote

Re: [O] org-annotate/collaboration?

>>> "Eric" == Eric Abrahamsen writes: > Matt Price writes: >> Does anyone use org-annotate actively? I'm wondering what your >> workflow is, how you incorporate comments, etc. > I wrote it, and I don't use it that much. I do use it for

Re: [O] org-annotate/collaboration?

Im using GNU/Linux, Ubutu and/or Arch. In bot cases I am using Ext4 filesystems, although i do use Fat filesystem(s)for compatibiliy with OS/X, that i infrequently use. On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 1:19 PM Cook, Malcolm wrote: > Alan, just wondering, what operating system and

Re: [O] org-annotate/collaboration?

Alan, just wondering, what operating system and file system are you using now?

Re: [O] org-annotate/collaboration?

Your thoughtful, incisive responses are appreciated. It's hard to imagine why that simple expedient---a directory listing with a comment field---has failed to catch hold. It was incredibly useful. Thanks Alan Davis On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Eric Abrahamsen

Re: [O] org-annotate/collaboration?

"Alan E. Davis" writes: > I am looking for something a little different than this: annotated ls > listings. I have been searching blindly for years for this. > > Back in the 90s was a Dos clone called 4dos, which featured directory > listings with annotations, such that

Re: [O] org-annotate/collaboration?

I am looking for something a little different than this: annotated ls listings. I have been searching blindly for years for this. Back in the 90s was a Dos clone called 4dos, which featured directory listings with annotations, such that typing whatever the command was (dir?), gave a listing with

Re: [O] org-annotate/collaboration?

Matt Price writes: > Does anyone use org-annotate actively? I'm wondering what your > workflow is, how you incorporate comments, etc. I wrote it, and I don't use it that much. I do use it for quick notes-to-self when writing, but footnotes do the job just as well. > I'm

[O] org-annotate/collaboration?

Does anyone use org-annotate actively? I'm wondering what your workflow is, how you incorporate comments, etc. I'm hoping to embark on a book project with a colleague. I would like to use org-mode if I can, but I need to get a sense of the collaboration workflow. When you work on projects