Hi Daniel,
On Sep 1, 2009, at 3:15 PM, Daniel Martins wrote:
Carsten,
thanks for your reply :
1. Looks like you are using a 7 day agenda. Consider using a day
agenda
(setq org-agenda-ndays 1)
I did it
2. Looks like you are including all TODO entries into your agenda.
Consider
Daniel Martins daniel...@gmail.com writes:
My org-agenda is incredibly slow. Please help me understand what is
happening
My computer is not so slow. It is a dual core
Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz
with 2GB of RAM
My organizer.org has 21000 lines
I can split it in a couple of files
This version is 30 days old.
To do not create problems with my Ubuntu distribution it is a bit hard to
try newer versions but I can try if this is
I feel that there is something critical beyond an upgrade but I do not know
how to find the core of the problem
Other modes are not slow
Daniel
On 2009-08-31 22:03 +0100, Daniel Martins wrote:
I did all but it complains about a org-agenda-list: Symbol's function
definition is void: elp-wrapper
Daniel
Maybe put (autoload 'elp-wrapper elp) somewhere in your .emacs. This
will get your org mode to compile.
But you may want to figure out
I had simply added load-path of version 6.29 and tried to load it without
sucess
Following the hints in
http://orgmode.org/worg/org-hacks.php#compiling-org-without-make
I could installed the new version and the times diminished.
However they are still high.
I possibly have to rearrange
On Apr 25, 2009, at 6:25 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
Eric S Fraga ucec...@ucl.ac.uk writes:
Carsten Dominik writes:
Ummm, this doesn't work for me? C-c C-x r is undefined.
You need to be in an org-mode buffer for this..
Ah. Yes.
I just use M-x org-reload and C-u M-x org-reload since
On Apr 28, 2009, at 12:33 PM, Rainer Stengele wrote:
Carsten Dominik schrieb:
I have just pushed one more optimization which may improve things a
bit
for you, Rainer.
- Carsten
...
Hi Carsten,
results see here:
before your last optimsation:
org-run-agenda-series
Carsten Dominik schrieb:
I have just pushed one more optimization which may improve things a bit
for you, Rainer.
- Carsten
...
Hi Carsten,
results see here:
before your last optimsation:
org-run-agenda-series 1 1.797
1.797
Carsten Dominik writes:
Ummm, this doesn't work for me? C-c C-x r is undefined.
You need to be in an org-mode buffer for this..
Ah. Yes.
In any case, I am impressed: from 4.5 seconds to less than a second in
one day! Can you do the same for my 2+ day optimisation runs I
require in
Eric S Fraga ucec...@ucl.ac.uk writes:
Carsten Dominik writes:
Ummm, this doesn't work for me? C-c C-x r is undefined.
You need to be in an org-mode buffer for this..
Ah. Yes.
I just use M-x org-reload and C-u M-x org-reload since that works
everywhere.
C-c C-x r doesn't work in the
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
Are both of you running compiled Lisp code?
yes. I install org-mode from debian unstable which compiles all the
lisp codes.
Are you using day view or week view (which makes 7 day views)
day view (used to use week view but was trying to
Interesting.
How many entries did this search return?
Could you do me a favor, get the git version I just pushed and try
to repeat the same command under the same conditions (compiled or
uncompiled, org stuff pre-loaded because of a previous agenda
command).
I may have made it quite a
Carsten Dominik writes:
Interesting.
How many entries did this search return?
Today, only 8 scheduled tasks, no diary entries, and no information in
the clock table (it's my get things done day ;-). Yesterday was a
much busier day with a handful more scheduled todos, 5 meetings and 4+
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
Could you do me a favor, get the git version I just pushed and try
to repeat the same command under the same conditions (compiled or
uncompiled, org stuff pre-loaded because of a previous agenda
command).
Results (with org-mode version
On Apr 24, 2009, at 12:25 PM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
Does seem faster! Numbers indicate a 2x improvement?
Yes.
With some more improvements (available now) this should get down to
1.5 seconds.
Not perfect, but almost a factor of three from the original 4.35
seconds.
Please, everybody
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
On Apr 24, 2009, at 12:25 PM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
With some more improvements (available now) this should get down to
1.5 seconds.
Not perfect, but almost a factor of three from the original 4.35
seconds.
Please, everybody watch out for
Hi Carsten,
strange enough the latest git version does not improve time for my agenda at
all.
It still is as slow or fast - however you see it.
org-version is 6.26trans
,
| org-run-agenda-series 1
1.797 1.797
| org-agenda
On Apr 24, 2009, at 3:37 PM, Rainer Stengele wrote:
Hi Carsten,
strange enough the latest git version does not improve time for my
agenda at all.
It still is as slow or fast - however you see it.
I think you have tag inheritance turned off, or you have everything in
top-level entries.
I ave just pushed one more optimization which may improve things a bit
for you, Rainer.
- Carsten
On Apr 24, 2009, at 3:37 PM, Rainer Stengele wrote:
Hi Carsten,
strange enough the latest git version does not improve time for my
agenda at all.
It still is as slow or fast - however you
On 2009-04-24 12:35 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
With some more improvements (available now) this should get down to
1.5 seconds. Not perfect, but almost a factor of three from the
original 4.35 seconds.
I have to ditch org 6.21b now for the performance gained.
What's really annoying is that
On 2009-04-24 16:57 +0100, Nick Dokos wrote:
Any one got a fix?
Does replacing 'byte-compile-file' with 'batch-byte-compile'
make any difference?
Nick
Thanks, Nick. It turned out that was a typo when I manually copied this
from my old setup.
Cheers,
--
.: Leo :. [ sdl.web AT gmail.com ]
Leo sdl@gmail.com wrote:
What's really annoying is that I can on longer use the following to
compile .el files. I am using GNU Emacs 23.0.92.1
(i386-apple-darwin9.6.0, NS apple-appkit-949.43) of 2009-04-22 on
neutron.local.
,[ .bash_profile ]
| alias
Carsten Dominik writes:
On Apr 24, 2009, at 3:37 PM, Rainer Stengele wrote:
Hi Carsten,
strange enough the latest git version does not improve time for my
agenda at all.
It still is as slow or fast - however you see it.
I think you have tag inheritance turned off, or you have
On Apr 24, 2009, at 5:47 PM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
On Apr 24, 2009, at 3:37 PM, Rainer Stengele wrote:
Hi Carsten,
strange enough the latest git version does not improve time for my
agenda at all.
It still is as slow or fast - however you see it.
I think you have
Carsten Dominik writes:
Hmmm, `org-up-heading-all' still gets called, this should no longer
happen.
I wonder why, when.
There must have been an error in recompilation after pulling the
updates with git. Although I asked emacs to recompile the directory,
it must have done something strange.
On Apr 25, 2009, at 12:26 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
Hmmm, `org-up-heading-all' still gets called, this should no longer
happen.
I wonder why, when.
There must have been an error in recompilation after pulling the
updates with git. Although I asked emacs to recompile
26 matches
Mail list logo
