Re: [O] [OT] Current website not very attractive

2012-09-22 Thread Achim Gratz
Bastien writes: > I think Jason is not online this week-end, so we will have to > live with it. He has just fixed it and it works again with my old configuration. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Samples for the Waldorf Blofeld: http://Syn

Re: [O] [OT] Current website not very attractive

2012-09-22 Thread John Hendy
For firewalls (im behind one too) see if theres an https alternative. I guess you solved this, but some might not be able to futz with proxies (or shouldn't) at work :) On Sep 21, 2012 5:50 PM, "Nick Dokos" wrote: > Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote: > > > Bastien, > > > > I can't clone the orgweb r

Re: [O] [OT] Current website not very attractive

2012-09-22 Thread Bastien
Nick Dokos writes: > Just tell people to use http: instead of git: for now. All right, you just did so. Thanks, -- Bastien

Re: [O] [OT] Current website not very attractive

2012-09-22 Thread Nick Dokos
Bastien wrote: > Yes, there is a problem here: only users with push access can > clone for now (and pull and push.) > > I think Jason is not online this week-end, so we will have to > live with it. > > I've created clones of org-mode.git and orgweb.git on github: > > https://github.com/bzg/

Re: [O] [OT] Current website not very attractive

2012-09-21 Thread Bastien
Yes, there is a problem here: only users with push access can clone for now (and pull and push.) I think Jason is not online this week-end, so we will have to live with it. I've created clones of org-mode.git and orgweb.git on github: https://github.com/bzg/org-mode https://github.com/bzg/o

Re: [O] [OT] Current website not very attractive

2012-09-21 Thread Nick Dokos
Nick Dokos wrote: > Eric Schulte wrote: > > > Nick Dokos writes: > > > > > Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote: > > > > > >> Bastien, > > >> > > >> I can't clone the orgweb repo: > > >> > > >> git clone git://orgmode.org/orgweb.git > > >> Cloning into 'orgweb'... > > >> fatal: The remote end hun

Re: [O] [OT] Current website not very attractive

2012-09-21 Thread Nick Dokos
Eric Schulte wrote: > Nick Dokos writes: > > > Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote: > > > >> Bastien, > >> > >> I can't clone the orgweb repo: > >> > >> git clone git://orgmode.org/orgweb.git > >> Cloning into 'orgweb'... > >> fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly > >> > >> Is the server is

Re: [O] [OT] Current website not very attractive

2012-09-21 Thread Eric Schulte
Nick Dokos writes: > Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote: > >> Bastien, >> >> I can't clone the orgweb repo: >> >> git clone git://orgmode.org/orgweb.git >> Cloning into 'orgweb'... >> fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly >> >> Is the server is down? >> > > I can't get to it either, but I am

Re: [O] [OT] Current website not very attractive

2012-09-21 Thread Nick Dokos
Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote: > Bastien, > > I can't clone the orgweb repo: > > git clone git://orgmode.org/orgweb.git > Cloning into 'orgweb'... > fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly > > Is the server is down? > I can't get to it either, but I am behind a firewall and have had probl

Re: [O] [OT] Current website not very attractive

2012-09-21 Thread Marcelo de Moraes Serpa
Bastien, I can't clone the orgweb repo: git clone git://orgmode.org/orgweb.git Cloning into 'orgweb'... fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly Is the server is down? - Marcelo. On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:41 AM, Bastien wrote: > Hi Marcelo, > > glad you like the new website! It's importa

Re: [O] [OT] Current website not very attractive

2012-09-13 Thread Bastien
Hi Marcelo, glad you like the new website! It's important to keep Org open to non-developers, it is good if the website somehow advertizes this attitude. Marcelo de Moraes Serpa writes: > I can help with the Spanish and Portuguese versions, by the way. Great! ~$ git clone git://orgmode.org

Re: [O] [OT] Current website not very attractive

2012-09-13 Thread Marcelo de Moraes Serpa
I can help with the Spanish and Portuguese versions, by the way. On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa < celose...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think the new design is more appealing to not-very-technical-people like > graphic designers and other "knowledge-workers" that might not be

Re: [O] [OT] Current website not very attractive

2012-09-13 Thread Marcelo de Moraes Serpa
I think the new design is more appealing to not-very-technical-people like graphic designers and other "knowledge-workers" that might not be coding-savvy, by the way. On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa < celose...@gmail.com> wrote: > Bastien et al, > > Congrats on the new si

Re: [O] [OT] Current website not very attractive

2012-09-13 Thread Marcelo de Moraes Serpa
Bastien et al, Congrats on the new site! I really liked the minimalist concept, the colors and the typography! It's much cleaner and much more attractive :) - Marcelo. On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Bastien wrote: > brian powell writes: > > > --I just hope that whoever "wins the contest" cr

Re: [O] [OT] Current website not very attractive

2012-08-11 Thread Bastien
brian powell writes: > --I just hope that whoever "wins the contest" creates web pages that > are "501 compliant" and everyone can read on any computer using any > operating system and browser and those webpages are as printable as a > Texinfo document. Even better: as the website is based on .o

Re: [O] [OT] Current website not very attractive

2012-08-11 Thread Bastien
Nick Dokos writes: > Another goal should be ease of maintenance of the website: I'm sure > neither Bastien nor Jason have infinite time to tweak things. I confirm I don't have infinite time, but I do have ~infinite patience for this kind of stuff. -- Bastien

Re: [O] [OT] Current website not very attractive

2012-08-11 Thread Bastien
Hi Marcelo, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa writes: > @Nick: I'm not a designer, more of a hybrid coder with some design > foundations, but I'm definitely willing to help. I don't like the > current layout because of it's overuse of shadows and its > "web1"-style layout. Also, typography could use some

Re: [O] [OT] Current website not very attractive

2012-08-10 Thread brian powell
* The site looks great as it is. ** Its supposed to be simple and simple-looking: *** Go to: http://orgmode.org => Read the top line: "Org: Your Life in Plain Text" *** Go to: http://doc.norang.ca/org-mode.html => Read the top line: "Org Mode - Organize Your Life In Plain Text!" * Simplicity

Re: [O] [OT] Current website not very attractive

2012-08-10 Thread Nick Dokos
Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote: > Hey guys, > > Didn't mean to start any kind of flame. > You did not. I didn't mean to either but my comment could be taken as inflammatory, hence my apology. > @Nick: I'm not a designer, more of a hybrid coder with some design > foundations, but I'm definitely

Re: [O] [OT] Current website not very attractive

2012-08-10 Thread Marcelo de Moraes Serpa
Hey guys, Didn't mean to start any kind of flame. @Nick: I'm not a designer, more of a hybrid coder with some design foundations, but I'm definitely willing to help. I don't like the current layout because of it's overuse of shadows and its "web1"-style layout. Also, typography could use some imp

Re: [O] [OT] Current website not very attractive

2012-08-09 Thread Nick Dokos
Nick Dokos wrote: > Sankalp wrote: > > > --f46d044401de1e3ad604c6de28a7 > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > > > I'm inclined to agree with Marcelo. > > -- > > Sankalp > > > > *** > > If humans could mate with software, I'd h

Re: [O] [OT] Current website not very attractive

2012-08-09 Thread Jambunathan K
> how would you improve it? I will probably make Worg Wikipedia-like 1. Quick navigation to one side. 2. TOC on top and bounded. 3. A header bar, maybe. 4. A bigger font. One can start with pedia.css provided by Emacswiki. I have followed this trail - Org as a Wiki and a personal inf

Re: [O] [OT] Current website not very attractive

2012-08-09 Thread Nick Dokos
Sankalp wrote: > --f46d044401de1e3ad604c6de28a7 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > I'm inclined to agree with Marcelo. > -- > Sankalp > > *** > If humans could mate with software, I'd have org-mode's > babies. >

Re: [O] [OT] Current website not very attractive

2012-08-09 Thread Ista Zahn
I love the orgmode website. If you want to see amateurish and not attractive, take a look at http://www.r-project.org/ (I love R too, but the website could use an update) -Ista On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote: > Hey list, > > Don't want to be negative, but doesn't a

Re: [O] [OT] Current website not very attractive

2012-08-09 Thread Sankalp
I'm inclined to agree with Marcelo. -- Sankalp *** If humans could mate with software, I'd have org-mode's babies. --- Chris League on Twitter. http://orgmode.org/worg/org-quotes.html *

Re: [O] [OT] Current website not very attractive

2012-08-09 Thread Jude DaShiell
Good, that probably means it's one of the more accessible and usable web sites on the internet. On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote: > Hey list, > > Don't want to be negative, but doesn't anyone else also think the current > design is kind of amateurish and not very attractive? I